Ovary and fallopian tube (female reproductive system; epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer)
Ovarian cancer
How surgery, platinum chemotherapy, bevacizumab, PARP inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates shaped care of epithelial ovarian cancer.
5-year relative survival · United States, SEER 8 registries
34.22%→54.04%
1975 (observed value; first year in the table) to 2018 (observed value; last observed year in the table and the highest observed value). Read these with the caveats under “Then and now”.Source
27 milestones, by decade
- Two large randomised trials of ovarian cancer screening in the general population found no significant reduction in deaths from the disease. In PLCO (78,216 women aged 55 to 74 in the United States, offered annual CA-125 for 6 years and transvaginal ultrasound for 4 years) the mortality rate ratio against usual care was 1.18 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.71). In UKCTOCS (202,562 women analysed in the United Kingdom; median follow-up 16.3 years) the authors reported no significant reduction in ovarian and tubal cancer deaths with multimodal screening (p = 0.58) or ultrasound screening (p = 0.36) compared with no screening. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation of 13 February 2018 is grade D (against screening) for asymptomatic women not known to have a high-risk hereditary cancer syndrome. The two trials used different screening strategies and populations, and their results are not pooled here.
- In 2022 the FDA approved label supplements that removed the later-line treatment indications for three PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: olaparib (26 August), rucaparib (10 June) and niraparib (14 September). The olaparib and rucaparib letters describe a voluntary withdrawal and the niraparib letter says removal; the letters give no reason. A Federal Register notice of 26 March 2024 (89 FR 20982) that records the withdrawal of approval of the three indications gives the FDA's stated concern: for rucaparib (ARIEL4) and olaparib (SOLO3), final overall survival results indicated that patients taking the drug potentially had shorter overall survival than patients not taking it, and for niraparib the FDA cited the results of those two trials as suggesting a class-wide effect. None of the three appears on the FDA list of withdrawn cancer accelerated approvals (content current as of 5 October 2026). Two later labelling actions narrowed maintenance indications: olaparib in recurrent disease to BRCA-mutated cancer (supplement 29, September 2023, in a letter that refers to new safety information about a potential serious risk of increased death in patients without BRCA mutations who received PARP inhibitor maintenance for recurrent ovarian cancer) and first-line niraparib to HRD-positive disease (supplements 3 and 4 of the tablet application, June 2025).
- In the SEER 21 registries (2016-2022), 54% of ovarian cancers were diagnosed at distant stage, with five-year relative survival of 31.5%, against 22% diagnosed at localized stage, with 91.9%. In the separate SEER 8 series, observed five-year relative survival rose from 34.22% (1975) to 54.04% (2018), and the US age-adjusted death rate fell from 10.01 per 100,000 in 1976 (the highest observed value in the table) to 5.30 in 2024. The SEER 8 and SEER 21 series use different registry sets and are not chained, and the page attributes none of these changes to a cause.
Evidence current to October 2026 · Checked against primary sources to the extent possible
A guided tour of 12 milestones. You can pause or step through it yourself.
Filter milestonesshowing all 27
- Prevention / screening
- Localised to perioperative
- Locally advanced
- Metastatic
- Maintenance / relapsed
Time scale is compressed before 1800 and expanded after 1945; breaks are marked on the axis. Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom, or use the buttons.
Molecular origins
Targeted therapy
- 2001 · Understanding · UnderstandingFallopian tube precursors reframe the origin of serous carcinomaFrom 2001, pathologists examining fallopian tubes removed from women at high inherited risk found abnormal, dysplastic changes in the tubes. A 2007 study of 55 pelvic serous cancers found tubal involvement in many cases labelled ovarian. A 2010 paper proposed that serous tumours arise from fallopian tube epithelium.Piek 2001: dysplasia in the tubes of 6 of 12 women with a hereditary predisposition (7 BRCA1-positive), none in 13 controls. Kindelberger 2007: of 55 evaluable pelvic serous carcinomas, 41 (75%) involved the endosalpinx; tubal intraepithelial carcinoma was found in 5 of 5 tubal, 4 of 6 peritoneal and 20 of 30 ovarian cases, and 93% of these lesions involved the fimbriae. Kurman and Shih 2010 proposed a model in which serous tumours arise from implanted fallopian tube epithelium.
- 2002 · Understanding · SurgeryCytoreduction and residual disease: maximal surgery linked to survivalStudies from 1975 onward linked the amount of tumour left after surgery to survival in advanced ovarian cancer. A 2002 analysis of 81 groups of patients found that groups in which more women had maximal surgery lived longer on average. These are observational findings, so fitter patients or less aggressive tumours may explain part of the link.Meta-analysis of 81 cohorts (6,885 patients) with stage III or IV disease treated with platinum-based chemotherapy: each 10% increase in maximal cytoreduction was associated with a 5.5% increase in median survival time (P<.001). Cohorts with 25% or less maximal cytoreduction had a mean weighted median survival of 22.7 months, cohorts with more than 75% had 33.9 months. Platinum dose-intensity was not significantly related to survival. Cohort-level, observational.
- 2002 · Understanding · Detection & preventionRisk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and opportunistic salpingectomyStudies of women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene changes found that removing the fallopian tubes and ovaries was associated with fewer ovarian and breast cancers and, in a large cohort, fewer deaths. Later population studies of women who had their tubes removed during other operations found lower rates of ovarian cancer. All of these are observational studies.Observational studies. Kauff 2002 (170 BRCA carriers aged 35 or older, mean follow-up 24.2 months): hazard ratio for breast or BRCA-related gynecologic cancer 0.25 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.74) with salpingo-oophorectomy. Domchek 2010 (2482 carriers): ovarian cancer HR 0.14 (0.04 to 0.59) with and 0.28 (0.12 to 0.69) without prior breast cancer; all-cause mortality HR 0.40 (0.26 to 0.61). Falconer 2015: salpingectomy HR 0.65 (0.52 to 0.81) for ovarian cancer.
- 2003 · Treatment · ChemotherapyCarboplatin versus cisplatin with paclitaxel: GOG-158, AGO-OVAR-3Two randomised trials compared carboplatin with cisplatin, each given with paclitaxel, as first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Neither reported a statistically significant survival difference between the regimens. The authors described the carboplatin combination as less toxic and easier to give (GOG-158) or as an important alternative (AGO-OVAR-3).GOG-158 (792 eligible, no residual mass >1.0 cm, non-inferiority): median PFS 19.4 vs 20.7 months and OS 48.7 vs 57.4 months for cisplatin-paclitaxel vs carboplatin-paclitaxel; RR of progression 0.88 (95% CI 0.75-1.03), of death 0.84 (0.70-1.02). AGO-OVAR-3 (798, stage IIB-IV): progression-free at 2 years 40.0% vs 37.5%; median PFS 19.1 vs 17.2 months; median OS 44.1 vs 43.3 months.
- 2006 · Treatment · ChemotherapyIntraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimal stage III: GOG-172In 415 eligible women with stage III ovarian cancer and small residual tumours, adding chemotherapy into the abdominal cavity was linked to median survival of about 66 months instead of about 50. Side effects were more common, and only 42 percent finished six cycles of the abdominal regimen.GOG-172: 429 randomised stage III patients with no residual mass >1.0 cm; IV paclitaxel plus IV cisplatin vs IV paclitaxel plus IP cisplatin and IP paclitaxel. Median PFS 18.3 vs 23.8 months (P=0.05); median OS 49.7 vs 65.6 months (P=0.03, log-rank). 42% of the IP group completed six cycles; grade 3-4 toxicities were more common with IP (P<=0.001). Earlier GOG-104: OS HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.61-0.96).
- 2010 · Treatment · SurgeryNeoadjuvant chemotherapy vs primary surgery: EORTC 55971, CHORUSTwo large randomised trials, reported in 2010 and 2015, compared starting with surgery against giving chemotherapy first and operating afterwards. Survival with chemotherapy first was not shown to be worse, and complications after surgery were less frequent. Both trials enrolled women with advanced disease.EORTC 55971 (670 randomised, stage IIIC or IV): hazard ratio for death with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking versus primary debulking 0.98 (90% CI 0.84 to 1.13; P=0.01 for non-inferiority). CHORUS (552 randomised): median overall survival 22.6 months with primary surgery versus 24.1 months with primary chemotherapy; hazard ratio 0.87 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.05), non-inferiority limit 1.18.
Immunotherapy
- 2011 · Treatment · TargetedBevacizumab added to first-line chemotherapy: GOG-218 and ICON7Two large randomised trials added bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. Both reported longer progression-free survival; in GOG-218 the median gain was about four months when bevacizumab continued after chemotherapy. Neither showed longer overall survival in the full study population, and bevacizumab was associated with more high blood pressure.GOG-218 (N=1873, placebo-controlled): median PFS 10.3 (control), 11.2 (bevacizumab initiation) and 14.1 months (throughout); HR 0.717 (95% CI 0.625-0.824) for throughout. Final OS HR 0.96 (0.85-1.09). ICON7 (N=1528, open label): PFS HR 0.81 (0.70-0.94); OS restricted mean 44.6 (chemotherapy) vs 45.5 months (bevacizumab; p=0.85); a poor-prognosis subgroup analysis was exploratory.
- 2011 · Detection · Detection & preventionOvarian cancer screening: PLCO and UKCTOCS find no mortality reductionTwo large randomised trials tested yearly screening with a CA-125 blood test, a vaginal ultrasound or both in women without symptoms. The US trial (2011) and the UK trial (long-term report, 2021) did not find a significant fall in deaths from ovarian cancer. The US trial recorded serious complications after false-positive results.PLCO (78,216 women aged 55 to 74): ovarian cancer mortality rate ratio 1.18 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.71), 118 vs 100 deaths; 163 of 1080 women who had surgery after a false-positive result (15%) had at least one serious complication. UKCTOCS (202,638 women aged 50 to 74): deaths from ovarian or tubal cancer 296 (multimodal screening), 291 (ultrasound) and 619 (no screening) at a median 16.3 years; no significant reduction (P=0.58 and P=0.36).
- 2011 · Understanding · UnderstandingInherited mutations are common in ovarian cancer: test all patientsFrom 2011, gene-sequencing studies found that a substantial share of women with ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer carry an inherited harmful gene change, often with no family history of the disease. The 2011 study found about one in four among 360 women. A 2020 ASCO guideline advises genetic testing for every woman with epithelial ovarian cancer.Walsh 2011 (360 women, consecutive, not selected for age or family history): germline loss-of-function mutations in 24%, BRCA1 or BRCA2 in 18%; over 30% of carriers had no family history of breast or ovarian carcinoma. Alsop 2012 (1,001 non-mucinous cases): germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 in 14.1%, 44% of carriers without family history. Norquist 2016 (1915 women): 18% pathogenic germline mutations, 15% in BRCA1 or BRCA2. ASCO 2020 recommends germline testing for all women with epithelial ovarian cancer.
- 2012 · Treatment · TargetedBevacizumab in recurrent disease: OCEANS, AURELIA, GOG-213Bevacizumab was added to chemotherapy in three randomised trials of recurrent ovarian cancer. It lengthened progression-free survival in platinum-sensitive disease (OCEANS) and platinum-resistant disease (AURELIA). In GOG-213, the survival difference in platinum-sensitive disease was not statistically significant in the main analysis.With vs without bevacizumab. OCEANS (N=484, platinum-sensitive, gemcitabine-carboplatin): median PFS 12.4 vs 8.4 months (HR 0.484; 95% CI 0.388-0.605). AURELIA (N=361, platinum-resistant): median PFS 6.7 vs 3.4 months (HR 0.48; 0.38-0.60); median OS 16.6 vs 13.3 months (HR 0.85; 0.66-1.08). GOG-213 (N=674, platinum-sensitive): median OS 42.2 vs 37.3 months (HR 0.829; 0.683-1.005; p=0.056).
- 2012 · Treatment · TargetedOlaparib maintenance in platinum-sensitive relapse: Study 19 and SOLO2Olaparib blocks PARP, an enzyme that helps cancer cells repair DNA. Taken after chemotherapy had controlled a returned ovarian cancer, it delayed progression: by about four months in Study 19, and by about fourteen months in SOLO2, which enrolled people with a BRCA mutation. The survival gains were not statistically significant.Study 19 (phase 2, N=265, serous, BRCA status not a selection criterion): median PFS 8.4 vs 4.8 months, HR 0.35 (95% CI 0.25-0.49); updated OS (77% maturity) HR 0.73 (0.55-0.96), nominal p=0.025, below the required threshold. SOLO2 (phase 3, BRCA1/2-mutated, N=295): investigator-assessed median PFS 19.1 vs 5.5 months, HR 0.30 (0.22-0.41); final OS 51.7 vs 38.8 months, HR 0.74 (0.54-1.00), p=0.054.
- 2016 · Reversal · ChemotherapyWeekly paclitaxel: JGOG 3016 gain not seen in GOG-262 or ICON8A Japanese trial (JGOG 3016) found longer survival with weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin than with the standard three-weekly schedule. Two later trials, GOG-262 in the United States and ICON8 in a mainly European population, did not show a significant gain in progression-free survival for weekly schedules.JGOG 3016 (631 analysed): dose-dense vs conventional, median PFS 28.0 vs 17.2 months (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.88); long-term median OS 100.5 vs 62.2 months (HR 0.79; 0.63-0.99). GOG-262 (N=692): ITT median PFS 14.7 vs 14.0 months (HR 0.89; 0.74-1.06). ICON8 (N=1566): median PFS 17.7 (3-weekly), 20.8 and 21.0 months (two weekly regimens); p=0.35 and 0.51 vs 3-weekly.
- 2016 · Treatment · TargetedNiraparib and rucaparib maintenance, relapsed disease: NOVA, ARIEL3Two placebo-controlled trials gave a PARP inhibitor as maintenance after platinum chemotherapy for returned ovarian cancer. Niraparib (NOVA) and rucaparib (ARIEL3) both delayed progression, including in groups without a germline BRCA mutation, although the gain was smaller there. In 2022 the US recurrent-maintenance labels for both were narrowed to BRCA-mutated disease.NOVA (N=553): median PFS 21.0 vs 5.5 months in the germline BRCA cohort (HR 0.27), 9.3 vs 3.9 months in the non-gBRCA cohort (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34-0.61). ARIEL3 (N=564, investigator-assessed): BRCA-mutant 16.6 vs 5.4 months (HR 0.23); ITT 10.8 vs 5.4 months (HR 0.36, 0.30-0.45). Overall survival results are not recorded here.
- 2018 · Treatment · TargetedSOLO-1: first-line olaparib maintenance for BRCA-mutated diseaseAfter surgery and chemotherapy for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, people whose tumours carried a BRCA mutation took olaparib or placebo as maintenance. Three years on, about three in five on olaparib had no progression, against about one in four on placebo. Seven-year follow-up suggested longer survival, which did not meet the prespecified significance threshold.SOLO-1 (N=391, 2:1, BRCA1/2-mutated, stage III-IV, after platinum response): freedom from progression and death at 3 years 60% vs 27%, HR 0.30 (95% CI 0.23-0.41). Post-hoc 5-year update: median PFS 56.0 vs 13.8 months, HR 0.33 (0.25-0.43). Prespecified 7-year OS: HR 0.55 (0.40-0.76), p=0.0004 (p<0.0001 required); 67.0% vs 46.5% alive.
- 2018 · Treatment · SurgeryHIPEC added to interval cytoreductive surgery: OVHIPEC-1Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) means bathing the abdomen in heated chemotherapy during surgery. A 2018 randomised trial of 245 women added it to interval surgery and reported longer time without recurrence and longer survival. A later Korean trial found no overall benefit, and a trial in relapsed disease again reported longer survival.OVHIPEC-1 (245 patients, stage III, interval surgery after three cycles of carboplatin-paclitaxel): median recurrence-free survival 14.2 vs 10.7 months (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.87); median OS 45.7 vs 33.9 months (HR 0.67, 0.48 to 0.94). KOV-HIPEC-01 (184): no significant overall PFS or OS difference; interval-surgery subgroup OS HR 0.53 (0.29 to 0.96). CHIPOR (415, first relapse): median OS 54.3 vs 45.8 months (HR 0.73, 0.56 to 0.96).
- 2019 · Reversal · ChemotherapyGOG-252: IP regimens plus bevacizumab, no significant PFS gainIn 1,560 women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, all given bevacizumab, intraperitoneal carboplatin or cisplatin regimens did not significantly lengthen progression-free survival compared with intravenous carboplatin. Median progression-free survival was about 25 months with intravenous treatment and 26 to 27 months with the two intraperitoneal regimens.GOG-252 (N=1560, 84.8 months follow-up; bevacizumab in all arms): median PFS 24.9 (IV carboplatin), 27.4 (IP carboplatin), 26.2 months (IP cisplatin); HR vs IV 0.925 (95% CI 0.802-1.07) and 0.977 (0.847-1.13), not significant. Stage II/III, residual 1 cm or less (n=1380): 26.9, 28.7, 27.8. Median OS, same order: 75.5, 78.9, 72.9. FACT-O Trial Outcome Index worse with IP cisplatin during chemotherapy.
- 2019 · Treatment · TargetedPAOLA-1: olaparib plus bevacizumab maintenance, HRD-positive diseasePAOLA-1 added olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance after first-line chemotherapy. Progression-free survival was longer overall, with the largest gain, about twenty months in the median, in HRD-positive tumours. Overall survival was not clearly longer in everyone, but an exploratory analysis in the HRD-positive group favoured olaparib.PAOLA-1 (N=806; all received bevacizumab): median PFS 22.1 vs 16.6 months, HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.49-0.72); HRD-positive 37.2 vs 17.7 months, HR 0.33 (0.25-0.45). Final OS: ITT 56.5 vs 51.6 months, HR 0.92 (0.76-1.12); exploratory HRD-positive HR 0.62 (0.45-0.85), 5-year OS 65.5% vs 48.4%.
- 2019 · Treatment · TargetedPRIMA: first-line niraparib maintenance beyond BRCAPRIMA tested niraparib or placebo as maintenance after first-line chemotherapy in people at high risk of recurrence, whatever their tumour's HRD status. Progression-free survival was longer with niraparib, with the largest gain in HRD-positive tumours. Final survival results, after about six years of follow-up, showed no difference between the groups.PRIMA (N=733, 2:1): median PFS 21.9 vs 10.4 months in HRD tumours (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.59) and 13.8 vs 8.2 months overall (HR 0.62, 0.50-0.76). Final OS after a median follow-up of 73.9 months: HR 1.01 (0.84-1.23) overall and 0.95 (0.70-1.29) in HRd; 37.8% of placebo and 11.7% of niraparib patients later received a PARP inhibitor.
- 2019 · De-escalation · SurgeryLION: lymphadenectomy not linked to longer survivalIn 2019 a randomised trial of 647 women with advanced ovarian cancer, whose visible tumour had been completely removed and whose lymph nodes looked normal, compared removing the pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes with leaving them in place. Survival was not longer with node removal, and serious complications were more frequent.LION: 647 randomised intraoperatively (FIGO IIB to IV, macroscopically complete resection, normal nodes before and during surgery). Median overall survival 69.2 months without lymphadenectomy versus 65.5 months with it (hazard ratio for death with lymphadenectomy 1.06, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.34; P=0.65); median progression-free survival 25.5 months in both groups (hazard ratio 1.11, 0.92 to 1.34). Repeat laparotomy 12.4% vs 6.5%; mortality within 60 days 3.1% vs 0.9% (with vs without lymphadenectomy).
- 2019 · Treatment · SurgerySecondary cytoreduction at first relapse: GOG-213, SOC-1, DESKTOP IIIThree randomised trials asked whether operating at the first relapse, before platinum chemotherapy, helps women whose cancer returned at least six months after platinum treatment. DESKTOP III and SOC-1, which chose patients by scoring systems, reported longer survival or longer progression-free survival; GOG-213, which used investigators' judgement, found no survival gain.Platinum-sensitive first relapse, surgery plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. DESKTOP III (407 patients): median OS 53.7 vs 46.0 months, HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.96). SOC-1 (357): median PFS 17.4 vs 11.9 months, HR 0.58 (0.45 to 0.74); interim OS HR 0.82 (0.57 to 1.19). GOG-213 (485): median OS 50.6 vs 64.7 months, HR 1.29 (0.97 to 1.72).
Precision & engineered
- 2021 · Reversal · ImmunotherapyFirst-line PD-L1 blockade: IMagyn050 and JAVELIN Ovarian 100Two large randomised trials added a PD-L1 antibody, atezolizumab or avelumab, to first-line treatment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. Neither showed a significant gain in progression-free survival in all participants, and the authors of both reports concluded that the results did not support these drugs in this setting.IMagyn050 (N=1301; carboplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab plus atezolizumab or placebo): median PFS 19.5 vs 18.4 months, ITT HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.79-1.07); PD-L1-positive 20.8 vs 18.5 months, HR 0.80 (0.65-0.99), not significant at the prespecified level. JAVELIN Ovarian 100 (N=998; stopped for futility at interim analysis): PFS HR 1.43 (1.05-1.95) for avelumab maintenance and 1.14 (0.83-1.56) for avelumab combination vs chemotherapy alone.
- 2022 · Treatment · TargetedLow-grade serous disease: MEK inhibition (GOG 281, RAMP 201)Low-grade serous ovarian cancer grows slowly and often responds poorly to chemotherapy. In GOG 281, the MEK inhibitor trametinib delayed progression by about six months compared with standard treatment. In RAMP 201, about three in ten responded to avutometinib with defactinib. The FDA granted accelerated approval for KRAS-mutated disease in 2025.GOG 281 (phase 2/3, N=260, recurrent LGSOC): trametinib vs standard of care, median PFS 13.0 vs 7.2 months, HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.36-0.64); ORR 26% vs 6%. RAMP 201 (phase 2, 115 treated): avutometinib plus defactinib ORR 31%, 44% in KRAS-mutant and 17% in KRAS wild-type; median DOR 31.1 months. MILO (binimetinib) did not improve PFS: HR 1.21 (0.79-1.86).
- 2022 · Treatment · Antibody–drug conjugateMirvetuximab soravtansine for folate receptor-high diseaseMirvetuximab soravtansine is an antibody joined to a chemotherapy drug that targets folate receptor alpha on some ovarian cancer cells. In a single-arm study, about one in three people with platinum-resistant disease responded. In a randomised trial, those given it lived about four months longer than those given chemotherapy, and their disease progressed later.SORAYA (single-arm phase 2, FRα-high, N=106): confirmed ORR 32.4% (95% CI 23.6-42.2), median DOR 6.9 months. MIRASOL (phase 3, FRα-high, N=453, vs investigator's-choice chemotherapy): median PFS 5.62 vs 3.98 months (p<0.001); ORR 42.3% vs 15.9%; median OS 16.46 vs 12.75 months, HR 0.67 (0.50-0.89), p=0.005.
- 2022 · Reversal · TargetedPARP inhibitor later-line ovarian indications withdrawn (2022)In 2022 three PARP inhibitors lost their later-line ovarian cancer treatment indications in the US: rucaparib in June and olaparib in August by voluntary withdrawal, niraparib in September by removal. In December, recurrent maintenance with niraparib and rucaparib was limited to BRCA-mutated disease (germline for niraparib). The FDA letters give no reasons.FDA letters: rucaparib (two or more prior lines) withdrawn 10 June 2022; olaparib (three or more) 26 August; niraparib (three or more, HRD-positive) removed 14 September; recurrent maintenance restricted to BRCA-mutated disease for niraparib (8 December) and rucaparib (21 December). ARIEL4 (N=349), reported separately: PFS HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.52-0.86); final OS 19.4 vs 25.4 months, rucaparib vs chemotherapy, HR 1.3 (1.0-1.7), 69% crossover.
- 2025 · Treatment · TargetedRelacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel, platinum-resistant: ROSELLARelacorilant is a pill that blocks the glucocorticoid receptor; the trial authors say it increases a tumour's sensitivity to chemotherapy. In ROSELLA, adding it to nab-paclitaxel for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer delayed progression by about one month and extended median survival by about four months. All participants had already received bevacizumab.ROSELLA (N=381, platinum-resistant, all with prior bevacizumab): relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel vs nab-paclitaxel alone. Median PFS by blinded central review 6.54 vs 5.52 months, HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.54-0.91), p=0.0076. Final OS 16.0 vs 11.9 months, HR 0.65 (0.51-0.83), p=0.0004; 18-month OS 46% vs 27%.
- 2026 · Treatment · ImmunotherapyKEYNOTE-B96: pembrolizumab plus weekly paclitaxel, PD-L1 CPS 1+KEYNOTE-B96 added the immune checkpoint antibody pembrolizumab to weekly paclitaxel for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Disease progressed later and survival was longer. Results were reported for everyone and for tumours with a PD-L1 combined positive score of 1 or more; the US approval covers only the latter.KEYNOTE-B96 (N=643, double-blind): pembrolizumab plus weekly paclitaxel vs placebo plus paclitaxel. PFS, CPS 1 or higher: 8.3 vs 7.2 months, HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.58-0.89); overall: 8.3 vs 6.4 months, HR 0.70 (0.58-0.84). OS, CPS 1 or higher (interim): 18.2 vs 14.0 months, HR 0.76 (0.61-0.94); overall (final): 17.7 vs 14.0 months, HR 0.82 (0.69-0.97).
Then and now
5-year relative survival · United States, SEER 8 registries
34.22%
1975 (observed value; first year in the table)
All races, females; SEER Cancer Stat Facts category 'ovarian cancer' (ovary), all stages together. The page gives no histology breakdown and does not say whether fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancers are included. SEER 8 five-year relative survival series (1975-2018). The page states no age range for this series.
Modeled-trend value for 1975: 33.40%. Relative survival excludes deaths from other causes. 'Observed' is the table's label for the yearly value, as opposed to the Joinpoint modeled-trend value in the adjacent column. The column is headed 'Year' and the chart note says only 'SEER 8 5-Year Relative Survival Percent from 1975-2018'; the page does not say the year is the year of diagnosis. SEER 8 covers a limited set of registries, and year-to-year values move (observed range 34.22% in 1975 to 54.04% in 2018, with 36.83% in 1976 and 52.83% in 2014). The page does not describe changes in stage mix, imaging, histologic classification, surgery or treatment over time and attributes the change to none of them. Read beside the mortality values below. Compare only with other values from this same SEER 8 series, not with the SEER 21 values.
5-year relative survival · United States, SEER 8 registries
54.04%
2018 (observed value; last observed year in the table and the highest observed value)
Same series and population as the 1975 value.
Modeled-trend value for 2018: 53.52%. Observed values for 2019-2023 are shown as '-' (not yet available) on the page. Relative survival excludes deaths from other causes. 'Observed' is the table's label for the yearly value, as opposed to the Joinpoint modeled-trend value in the adjacent column. The column is headed 'Year' and the chart note says only 'SEER 8 5-Year Relative Survival Percent from 1975-2018'; the page does not say the year is the year of diagnosis. SEER 8 covers a limited set of registries, and year-to-year values move (observed range 34.22% in 1975 to 54.04% in 2018, with 36.83% in 1976 and 52.83% in 2014). The page does not describe changes in stage mix, imaging, histologic classification, surgery or treatment over time and attributes the change to none of them. Read beside the mortality values below. Compare only with other values from this same SEER 8 series, not with the SEER 21 values.
5-year relative survival · United States, SEER 21 (excluding IL)
52%
2016-2022
All races, females; SEER Cancer Stat Facts category 'ovarian cancer' (ovary), all stages together. The page gives no histology breakdown and does not state an age range.
Relative survival excludes deaths from other causes. SEER 21 (excluding IL) is a different, larger registry set than SEER 8, so this value is not a continuation of the 1975-2018 series and the two are not subtracted. The page does not describe changes in stage mix, imaging or treatment and does not compare this value with earlier periods.
5-year relative survival · United States, SEER 21 (excluding IL)
91.9%
2016-2022; localized (confined to the primary site) stage at diagnosis (22% of cases)
70.1%
2016-2022; regional (spread to regional lymph nodes) stage at diagnosis (18% of cases)
31.5%
2016-2022; distant (metastasized) stage at diagnosis (54% of cases)
All races, females; SEER Combined Summary Stage at diagnosis. Share of cases by stage on the page: localized 22% (text: 21.7%), regional 18%, distant 54%, unstaged 6% (five-year relative survival 38.5% for unstaged, not entered here).
Stage at diagnosis is a major determinant of survival, and the page states that 54% of cases are distant stage. SEER 21 (excluding IL) is a different registry set from the SEER 8 trend series; do not chain them. Relative survival excludes deaths from other causes. Stage-specific values do not account for histology, age or treatment, which the page does not break out.
Age-standardised mortality · United States (U.S. Mortality data shown on the SEER page; not a SEER registry series)
9.82per 100,000
1975 (observed value; first year in the table)
All races, females; ovarian cancer deaths; age-adjusted rate per 100,000 women.
Modeled-trend value for 1975: 9.90 (the highest modeled value). Age-adjusted. The page states that death rates fell on average 2.9% per year over 2015-2024 and attributes the change to no cause; it does not describe changes over time in coding of deaths, treatment, screening or risk factors. The 1975-2024 values come from the 'Death Rate - U.S.' column of the page's data table, which is a different series from the SEER 8 survival column and the SEER 21 values. Read beside the survival values above.
Age-standardised mortality · United States (U.S. Mortality data shown on the SEER page; not a SEER registry series)
10.01per 100,000
1976 (observed value; highest observed value in the table)
All races, females; ovarian cancer deaths; age-adjusted rate per 100,000 women.
Modeled-trend value for 1976: 9.78. The page does not state a peak year. Age-adjusted. The page states that death rates fell on average 2.9% per year over 2015-2024 and attributes the change to no cause; it does not describe changes over time in coding of deaths, treatment, screening or risk factors. The 1975-2024 values come from the 'Death Rate - U.S.' column of the page's data table, which is a different series from the SEER 8 survival column and the SEER 21 values. Read beside the survival values above.
Age-standardised mortality · United States (U.S. Mortality data shown on the SEER page; not a SEER registry series)
5.3per 100,000
2024 (observed value; last year in the table)
All races, females; ovarian cancer deaths; age-adjusted rate per 100,000 women.
Modeled-trend value for 2024: 5.35. Age-adjusted. The page states that death rates fell on average 2.9% per year over 2015-2024 and attributes the change to no cause; it does not describe changes over time in coding of deaths, treatment, screening or risk factors. The 1975-2024 values come from the 'Death Rate - U.S.' column of the page's data table, which is a different series from the SEER 8 survival column and the SEER 21 values. Read beside the survival values above.
Age-standardised mortality · United States (U.S. Mortality data shown on the SEER page; not a SEER registry series)
5.7per 100,000
2020-2024 (five-year aggregate stated in the page text)
All races, females; ovarian cancer deaths; age-adjusted rate per 100,000 women.
Five-year aggregate rate given in the text of the page (death rate 5.7 per 100,000 women per year, 2020-2024); it is a different measure from the single-year observed value for 2024 and the two are not interchangeable. Age-adjusted. The page states that death rates fell on average 2.9% per year over 2015-2024 and attributes the change to no cause; it does not describe changes over time in coding of deaths, treatment, screening or risk factors. The 1975-2024 values come from the 'Death Rate - U.S.' column of the page's data table, which is a different series from the SEER 8 survival column and the SEER 21 values. Read beside the survival values above.
Survival figures are affected by earlier detection (lead time) and overdiagnosis, and by changes in who is diagnosed. For screened cancers, read them alongside mortality.
Evidence chains
A lane follows one defined population and setting, where each new trial tests against what was then standard. Compare only within a lane, and read every comparison as illustrative.
First-line chemotherapy: regimens and schedules
Adults with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer given platinum-based first-line chemotherapy in randomised comparisons of drugs or schedules (GOG-111, OV-10, ICON3, GOG-158, AGO-OVAR-3, JGOG 3016, GOG-262, ICON8) · Locally advanced · endpoint: PFS
Results are not comparable across trials.
The trials changed different things: GOG-111 and OV-10 replaced cyclophosphamide with paclitaxel in a cisplatin combination; ICON3 compared paclitaxel with carboplatin against carboplatin alone or an older three-drug regimen chosen by the patient and clinician before randomisation; GOG-158 and AGO-OVAR-3 compared carboplatin with cisplatin, each with paclitaxel; JGOG 3016, GOG-262 and ICON8 compared weekly with three-weekly paclitaxel. Eligibility differs (GOG-111 required residual masses over 1 cm; GOG-158 required no residual mass over 1 cm; JGOG 3016 enrolled stage II-IV disease in Japan), and in GOG-262 bevacizumab use was the patient's choice. ICON3's progression-free survival was a secondary outcome, AGO-OVAR-3's plotted median is a secondary endpoint (its primary endpoint was the proportion progression-free at 2 years), ICON8's medians are given with interquartile ranges and its primary comparison used restricted mean survival time, and GOG-158 reported a relative risk of progression rather than a hazard ratio. ICON8's weekly-carboplatin group is not drawn. Points carry the year of their milestone (1996, 2003, 2016), not each trial's publication year. Eras, partner drugs and follow-up differ; compare only each trial's own two arms. The chart is not a pooled or network estimate.
Each pair shows one trial: its control arm and its experimental arm. Yesterday's experimental arm is often today's control. Populations, definitions and follow-up differ.
- experimental arm
- control arm
- different endpoint from the lane's
- step line through experimental values
Data table
| Trial | Year | Endpoint | Control (months) | Experimental (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOG-111 | 1996 | PFS | 13 months | 18 months |
| OV-10 | 1996 | PFS | 11.5 months | 15.5 months |
| ICON3 | 1996 | PFS | 16.1 months | 17.3 months |
| GOG-158 | 2003 | PFS | 19.4 months | 20.7 months |
| AGO-OVAR-3 | 2003 | PFS | 19.1 months | 17.2 months |
| JGOG 3016 | 2016 | PFS | 17.2 months | 28 months |
| GOG-0262 | 2016 | PFS | 14 months | 14.7 months |
| ICON8 | 2016 | PFS | 17.7 months | 20.8 months |
First-line intraperitoneal versus intravenous chemotherapy
Adults with newly diagnosed optimally debulked ovarian cancer: GOG-172 enrolled stage III disease with no residual mass over 1 cm; GOG-252 enrolled advanced disease designed for residual disease of 1 cm or less · Locally advanced · endpoint: PFS
Results are not comparable across trials.
The two trials differ in era, chemotherapy and control. GOG-172 compared intravenous paclitaxel plus intravenous cisplatin with intravenous paclitaxel plus intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel. GOG-252 gave bevacizumab in all arms, used weekly paclitaxel, and compared intravenous carboplatin with two intraperitoneal regimens; its intraperitoneal cisplatin arm is the one drawn, and the intraperitoneal carboplatin arm is described in the milestone. GOG-252 did not show a significant progression-free survival gain from either intraperitoneal regimen. Compare only each trial's own two arms.
Each pair shows one trial: its control arm and its experimental arm. Yesterday's experimental arm is often today's control. Populations, definitions and follow-up differ.
- experimental arm
- control arm
- different endpoint from the lane's
- step line through experimental values
First-line chemotherapy with an added agent (bevacizumab or atezolizumab)
Adults with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer given first-line carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without an added agent (GOG-218: bevacizumab; IMagyn050: atezolizumab) · Locally advanced · endpoint: PFS
Results are not comparable across trials.
The added agents and controls differ. GOG-218 was placebo-controlled; the arm drawn is bevacizumab given throughout versus chemotherapy plus placebo. In IMagyn050 both arms received bevacizumab, so the comparison is atezolizumab versus placebo on top of chemotherapy and bevacizumab. IMagyn050's plotted value is investigator-assessed in the intention-to-treat population, whose result was not significant. ICON7 (restricted mean PFS, no arm medians) and JAVELIN Ovarian 100 (no control-arm median recorded) are not drawn; their results are in the milestones. Eras differ; compare only each trial's own two arms.
Each pair shows one trial: its control arm and its experimental arm. Yesterday's experimental arm is often today's control. Populations, definitions and follow-up differ.
- experimental arm
- control arm
- different endpoint from the lane's
- step line through experimental values
First-line PARP inhibitor maintenance, biomarker-defined populations
Adults with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, in biomarker-defined groups: SOLO-1 BRCA1/2-mutated disease; PRIMA tumours with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD); PAOLA-1 HRD-positive tumours, all treated with bevacizumab · Maintenance · endpoint: PFS
Results are not comparable across trials.
The three populations are not the same group. SOLO-1 enrolled only BRCA1/2-mutated disease and its plotted medians come from a post hoc, investigator-assessed 5-year update (its primary analysis reported 3-year freedom from progression, not medians). PRIMA's plotted value is the primary HRD analysis (blinded central review) from a trial of people at high risk of recurrence whatever their HRD status. PAOLA-1 gave bevacizumab to everyone, and its HRD-positive result, which includes BRCA-mutated tumours, is described as a prespecified exploratory analysis. HRD is defined by each trial's own test. The all-comers results of PRIMA and PAOLA-1 are in the milestones, not drawn. Follow-up and the proportion with residual disease differ; compare only each trial's own two arms.
Each pair shows one trial: its control arm and its experimental arm. Yesterday's experimental arm is often today's control. Populations, definitions and follow-up differ.
- experimental arm
- control arm
- different endpoint from the lane's
- step line through experimental values
Data table
| Trial | Year | Endpoint | Control (months) | Experimental (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOLO-1 | 2018 | PFS | 13.8 months | 56 months |
| PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 | 2019 | PFS | 10.4 months | 21.9 months |
| PAOLA-1 | 2019 | PFS | 17.7 months | 37.2 months |
Platinum-sensitive relapse: PARP inhibitor maintenance in BRCA-mutated disease
Adults with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer responding to platinum-based chemotherapy, BRCA-mutated groups only: SOLO2 (BRCA1/2 mutation), NOVA (germline BRCA cohort) and ARIEL3 (BRCA-mutant carcinoma) · Maintenance · endpoint: PFS
Results are not comparable across trials.
Only the BRCA-mutated groups are drawn so that the three comparisons match. Definitions differ: NOVA's plotted cohort required a germline BRCA mutation, whereas SOLO2 and ARIEL3 define BRCA-mutated disease by their own criteria. Olaparib was given as tablets in SOLO2; SOLO2 and ARIEL3 medians are investigator-assessed. Study 19 (phase 2, not selected for BRCA status, capsule formulation) has no BRCA-specific progression-free survival median recorded and is not drawn. NOVA's and ARIEL3's other groups (the non-germline-BRCA cohort, which only lacks a germline mutation, and the HRD and all-comers populations) are in the milestone, not drawn. The SOLO2 point carries the milestone year of 2012 although SOLO2 reported in 2017. The 2022 label changes are in a separate milestone. Compare only each trial's own two arms.
Each pair shows one trial: its control arm and its experimental arm. Yesterday's experimental arm is often today's control. Populations, definitions and follow-up differ.
- experimental arm
- control arm
- different endpoint from the lane's
- step line through experimental values
Data table
| Trial | Year | Endpoint | Control (months) | Experimental (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21 | 2012 | PFS | 5.5 months | 19.1 months |
| NOVA/ENGOT-OV16 | 2016 | PFS | 5.5 months | 21 months |
| ARIEL3 | 2016 | PFS | 5.4 months | 16.6 months |
Platinum-resistant disease: randomised phase 3 trials
Adults with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer in randomised phase 3 trials: AURELIA (no more than two prior regimens), MIRASOL (folate receptor alpha-high, one to three prior lines), ROSELLA (one to three prior lines, all with prior bevacizumab), KEYNOTE-B96 (one to two prior regimens, PD-L1 CPS 1 or more drawn) · Relapsed / refractory · endpoint: PFS
Results are not comparable across trials.
Controls, biomarker selection, prior bevacizumab and PFS assessment differ: AURELIA (open label, RECIST) compared chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab; MIRASOL (open label, investigator-assessed) compared mirvetuximab with investigator's-choice chemotherapy in folate receptor alpha-high disease; ROSELLA compared nab-paclitaxel with and without relacorilant by blinded central review; KEYNOTE-B96 added pembrolizumab to weekly paclitaxel and is drawn for the PD-L1 CPS 1 or more population at its first interim analysis. The KEYNOTE-B96 overall-population result is in the milestone. SORAYA is single-arm and OCEANS and GOG-213 (platinum-sensitive disease) are not drawn. Eras differ; compare only each trial's own two arms.
Each pair shows one trial: its control arm and its experimental arm. Yesterday's experimental arm is often today's control. Populations, definitions and follow-up differ.
- experimental arm
- control arm
- different endpoint from the lane's
- step line through experimental values
Data table
| Trial | Year | Endpoint | Control (months) | Experimental (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AURELIA | 2012 | PFS | 3.4 months | 6.7 months |
| MIRASOL | 2022 | PFS | 3.98 months | 5.62 months |
| ROSELLA/GOG-3073/ENGOT-ov72 | 2025 | PFS | 5.52 months | 6.54 months |
| ENGOT-ov65/KEYNOTE-B96 | 2026 | PFS | 7.2 months | 8.3 months |
Recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma: MEK inhibitor versus standard treatment
Adults with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube or peritoneum in randomised trials of a MEK inhibitor against a standard-treatment control (GOG 281: trametinib; MILO: binimetinib) · Relapsed / refractory · endpoint: PFS
Results are not comparable across trials.
GOG 281 (phase 2/3, trametinib versus one of five standard-of-care options, no limit on prior regimens) and MILO (phase 3, binimetinib versus physician's-choice chemotherapy after one to three prior chemotherapy lines) differ in drug, control and prior therapy. MILO's plotted value is its interim analysis, which crossed the prespecified futility boundary, and its point carries the milestone year of 2022 although the interim analysis dates from 2016. RAMP 201 is a single-arm phase 2 study and is not drawn. Compare only each trial's own two arms.
Each pair shows one trial: its control arm and its experimental arm. Yesterday's experimental arm is often today's control. Populations, definitions and follow-up differ.
- experimental arm
- control arm
- different endpoint from the lane's
- step line through experimental values
Data table
| Trial | Year | Endpoint | Control (months) | Experimental (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MILO/ENGOT-ov11 | 2022 | PFS | 10.6 months | 9.1 months |
| GOG 281/LOGS | 2022 | PFS | 7.2 months | 13 months |
Standard of care, then and now
How the usual sequence of treatment changed for one setting. Choose a point in time; each step links to the milestone behind it.
Newly diagnosed advanced disease: maintenance after first-line chemotherapy
Adults with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer responding to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy · Maintenance
- Targeted1Bevacizumab with chemotherapyBevacizumab added to first-line chemotherapy: GOG-218 and ICON7 (2011)
- Targeted2Olaparib (BRCA-mutated)SOLO-1: first-line olaparib maintenance for BRCA-mutated disease (2018)
- Targeted3NiraparibPRIMA: first-line niraparib maintenance beyond BRCA (2019)
- Targeted4Olaparib plus bevacizumab (HRD-positive)PAOLA-1: olaparib plus bevacizumab maintenance, HRD-positive disease (2019)
Text version
- 2011: Bevacizumab with chemotherapy
- 2018: Bevacizumab with chemotherapy → Olaparib (BRCA-mutated)
- 2020: Bevacizumab with chemotherapy → Olaparib (BRCA-mutated) → Niraparib → Olaparib plus bevacizumab (HRD-positive)
Platinum-resistant disease: systemic treatment
Adults with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer · Relapsed / refractory
- Targeted1Chemotherapy plus bevacizumabBevacizumab in recurrent disease: OCEANS, AURELIA, GOG-213 (2012)
- Antibody–drug conjugate2Mirvetuximab (folate receptor alpha+)Mirvetuximab soravtansine for folate receptor-high disease (2022)
- Targeted3Relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxelRelacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel, platinum-resistant: ROSELLA (2025)
- Immunotherapy4Pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel (PD-L1 CPS 1+)KEYNOTE-B96: pembrolizumab plus weekly paclitaxel, PD-L1 CPS 1+ (2026)
Text version
- 2014: Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab
- 2022: Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab → Mirvetuximab (folate receptor alpha+)
- 2026: Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab → Mirvetuximab (folate receptor alpha+) → Relacorilant plus nab-paclitaxel → Pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel (PD-L1 CPS 1+)
Reversals and dead ends
Approaches that were abandoned or withdrawn, and trials whose results were later questioned, are part of the story.
2016
Weekly paclitaxel: JGOG 3016 gain not seen in GOG-262 or ICON8
A Japanese trial (JGOG 3016) found longer survival with weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin than with the standard three-weekly schedule. Two later trials, GOG-262 in the United States and ICON8 in a mainly European population, did not show a significant gain in progression-free survival for weekly schedules.
JGOG 3016 (631 analysed): dose-dense vs conventional, median PFS 28.0 vs 17.2 months (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.88); long-term median OS 100.5 vs 62.2 months (HR 0.79; 0.63-0.99). GOG-262 (N=692): ITT median PFS 14.7 vs 14.0 months (HR 0.89; 0.74-1.06). ICON8 (N=1566): median PFS 17.7 (3-weekly), 20.8 and 21.0 months (two weekly regimens); p=0.35 and 0.51 vs 3-weekly.
2019
GOG-252: IP regimens plus bevacizumab, no significant PFS gain
In 1,560 women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, all given bevacizumab, intraperitoneal carboplatin or cisplatin regimens did not significantly lengthen progression-free survival compared with intravenous carboplatin. Median progression-free survival was about 25 months with intravenous treatment and 26 to 27 months with the two intraperitoneal regimens.
GOG-252 (N=1560, 84.8 months follow-up; bevacizumab in all arms): median PFS 24.9 (IV carboplatin), 27.4 (IP carboplatin), 26.2 months (IP cisplatin); HR vs IV 0.925 (95% CI 0.802-1.07) and 0.977 (0.847-1.13), not significant. Stage II/III, residual 1 cm or less (n=1380): 26.9, 28.7, 27.8. Median OS, same order: 75.5, 78.9, 72.9. FACT-O Trial Outcome Index worse with IP cisplatin during chemotherapy.
2021
First-line PD-L1 blockade: IMagyn050 and JAVELIN Ovarian 100
Two large randomised trials added a PD-L1 antibody, atezolizumab or avelumab, to first-line treatment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. Neither showed a significant gain in progression-free survival in all participants, and the authors of both reports concluded that the results did not support these drugs in this setting.
IMagyn050 (N=1301; carboplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab plus atezolizumab or placebo): median PFS 19.5 vs 18.4 months, ITT HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.79-1.07); PD-L1-positive 20.8 vs 18.5 months, HR 0.80 (0.65-0.99), not significant at the prespecified level. JAVELIN Ovarian 100 (N=998; stopped for futility at interim analysis): PFS HR 1.43 (1.05-1.95) for avelumab maintenance and 1.14 (0.83-1.56) for avelumab combination vs chemotherapy alone.
2022
PARP inhibitor later-line ovarian indications withdrawn (2022)
In 2022 three PARP inhibitors lost their later-line ovarian cancer treatment indications in the US: rucaparib in June and olaparib in August by voluntary withdrawal, niraparib in September by removal. In December, recurrent maintenance with niraparib and rucaparib was limited to BRCA-mutated disease (germline for niraparib). The FDA letters give no reasons.
FDA letters: rucaparib (two or more prior lines) withdrawn 10 June 2022; olaparib (three or more) 26 August; niraparib (three or more, HRD-positive) removed 14 September; recurrent maintenance restricted to BRCA-mutated disease for niraparib (8 December) and rucaparib (21 December). ARIEL4 (N=349), reported separately: PFS HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.52-0.86); final OS 19.4 vs 25.4 months, rucaparib vs chemotherapy, HR 1.3 (1.0-1.7), 69% crossover.
Today and tomorrow
Standard of care today
- Screening
- The US Preventive Services Task Force final recommendation statement of 13 February 2018 (recommendation page and JAMA abstract read) recommends against screening for ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women who are not known to have a high-risk hereditary cancer syndrome (grade D). The page says transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA-125 testing are commonly used to evaluate women with signs or symptoms and have been evaluated in screening studies. The randomised trial evidence (PLCO, UKCTOCS) is summarised in the hooks. No FDA or EMA action on ovarian cancer screening is described here.
- US Preventive Services Task Force 2018US Preventive Services Task Force, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Davidson KW, et al 2018Buys SS, Partridge E, Black A, Johnson CC, Lamerato L, Isaacs C, et al 2011Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Singh N, Ryan A, Karpinskyj C, et al 2021
- Prevention
- An ACOG Clinical Practice Update (Obstetrics and Gynecology 2026; abstract read, full text not read) states that it provides updated information supporting complete bilateral salpingectomy at the time of obstetric and gynecologic surgery, and wider availability of salpingectomy during non-gynecologic abdominopelvic surgery, for primary prevention of epithelial ovarian cancer. The cohort evidence for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and salpingectomy is in the milestone timeline. No FDA or EMA action specific to prevention is described here.
- Guideline: American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists Committee on Clinical Consensus—Gynecology 2026Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, Scheuer L, Hensley M, Hudis CA, et al 2002Falconer H, Yin L, Grönberg H, Altman D 2015
- Any setting
- Genetic testing. The ASCO guideline on germline and somatic testing (J Clin Oncol 2020; abstract read, full text not read) states that all women with epithelial ovarian cancer should have germline testing for BRCA1/2 and other ovarian cancer susceptibility genes, with somatic BRCA1/2 testing for those without a germline variant, and testing at the time of diagnosis. The 2025 ASCO neoadjuvant chemotherapy guideline update (abstract read) states that all patients should be offered germline genetic and somatic testing at diagnosis. FDA companion diagnostic approvals were not opened.
- Konstantinopoulos PA, Norquist B, Lacchetti C, Armstrong D, Grisham RN, Goodfellow PJ, et al 2020Gaillard S, Lacchetti C, Armstrong DK, Cliby WA, Edelson MI, Garcia AA, et al 2025
- Neoadjuvant
- Sequencing of surgery and chemotherapy in stage III-IV disease. The 2025 ASCO neoadjuvant chemotherapy guideline update, endorsed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (abstract read, full text not read), recommends primary cytoreductive surgery for patients fit for surgery with a high likelihood of complete cytoreduction, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a platinum-taxane doublet when complete cytoreduction is unlikely or perioperative risk is high. It states that interval cytoreductive surgery should follow no more than four cycles in patients with response or stable disease, that hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be offered during interval surgery in stage III disease with good performance status and adequate renal function, and that chemotherapy then continues to six cycles with optional bevacizumab. No FDA or EMA action on a surgical strategy is described here.
- Gaillard S, Lacchetti C, Armstrong DK, Cliby WA, Edelson MI, Garcia AA, et al 2025
- Locally advanced
- First-line systemic therapy for stage III-IV disease. FDA approved bevacizumab with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by single-agent bevacizumab, for stage III or IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer following initial surgical resection on 13 June 2018 (supplement approval letter read; it has no accelerated-approval wording, so a regular approval is an inference). The indication is in the Avastin label record read through openFDA (version 39, effective 6 January 2025). The 2025 ASCO guideline abstract names a platinum-taxane doublet and optional bevacizumab after interval surgery.
- FDA 2018FDA 2025Gaillard S, Lacchetti C, Armstrong DK, Cliby WA, Edelson MI, Garcia AA, et al 2025
- Maintenance
First-line maintenance after response to platinum-based chemotherapy. FDA documents read:
- olaparib for germline or somatic BRCA-mutated disease (19 December 2018) and olaparib with bevacizumab for HRD-positive disease (8 May 2020), both in the Lynparza label record read through openFDA (version 38, effective 10 July 2025)
- niraparib, approved on 29 April 2020 for patients in complete or partial response with no biomarker restriction in the letter, was narrowed to HRD-positive disease by supplement approval letters signed 18 June 2025 (supplements 3 and 4 of the tablet application
- the letter says it provides for an update 'to narrow the indication') and the Zejula label record read through openFDA (version 10, effective 28 July 2026) carries that wording. No FDA first-line rucaparib ovarian indication appears in the letters read or in the Drugs@FDA supplement list for the rucaparib application (2022 onward). The ESMO Express Update of February 2026 (full text read) recommends PARP inhibitor maintenance, with or without bevacizumab, for BRCA1/2-mutated or BRCA1/2 wild-type HRD-positive tumours with response to first-line platinum-paclitaxel [I, A], listing olaparib for 2 years (BRCA1/2-mutated tumours only), olaparib for 2 years with bevacizumab for 15 months, rucaparib for 2 years and niraparib for 3 years among the options, and states that bevacizumab for 15 months, rucaparib or niraparib can be recommended for HRD-negative tumours
- the status of rucaparib for this use outside the United States was not checked. The ASCO PARP inhibitor rapid recommendation update of 2022 (J Clin Oncol, PMID 36150092) is cited by identifier only
- FDA 2018FDA 2020FDA 2020FDA 2025FDA 2025FDA 2026Guideline: González-Martín A, Ledermann JA 2026Guideline: Tew WP, Lacchetti C, Kohn EC 2022
- Relapsed / refractory
Platinum-sensitive recurrence. FDA approved bevacizumab with carboplatin and paclitaxel, or with carboplatin and gemcitabine, followed by single-agent bevacizumab, on 6 December 2016 (letter read; the indication is in the Avastin label record). PARP inhibitor maintenance after response to platinum is now worded for BRCA-mutated disease only:
- olaparib (germline or somatic
- supplement 29 letter signed 12 September 2023), niraparib (germline BRCA-mutated
- 8 December 2022 letter) and rucaparib (germline and/or somatic BRCA mutation
- 21 December 2022 letter)
- the current Rubraca label was not retrieved. The later-line single-agent treatment indications were removed in 2022 (see the hooks). The ASCO living guideline on recurrence (version 2026.1.0
- abstract read, full text not read) states that clinicians should offer a platinum-based combination (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with carboplatin, paclitaxel with carboplatin, or gemcitabine with carboplatin), that bevacizumab may be added with bevacizumab maintenance, that there is insufficient evidence to recommend secondary cytoreduction or HIPEC, and that secondary cytoreduction may be discussed where complete gross resection is highly achievable in platinum-sensitive recurrence. A footnote to the ESMO Express Update's recurrent-disease algorithm lists niraparib and rucaparib 'regardless of BRCA1/2-mut status' beside olaparib for BRCA1/2-mutated disease (the figure itself was not viewed), which differs from the FDA wording
- FDA 2016FDA 2025FDA 2023FDA 2022FDA 2022FDA 2025FDA 2026Guideline: Lesnock JL, Temin S, Bouberhan S, Adams SF, Barber EL, Burkett WC, et al 2026Guideline: González-Martín A, Ledermann JA 2026
- Relapsed / refractory
Platinum-resistant disease. FDA documents read:
- mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx for folate receptor alpha-positive disease after one to three prior regimens (accelerated approval, 14 November 2022, 'based on tumor response rate and durability of response'
- the 22 March 2024 supplement approval submitted the MIRASOL study report to satisfy the postmarketing requirement, and the letter states that it fulfils commitments under 21 CFR 601.41 without using the word converted
- FDA's list of cancer accelerated approvals with verified clinical benefit gives 14 November 2022 and 22 March 2024 for this indication)
- pembrolizumab with paclitaxel, with or without bevacizumab, for tumours with PD-L1 CPS 1 or more by an FDA-authorized test after one or two prior regimens (10 February 2026)
- relacorilant with nab-paclitaxel after one to three prior regimens, at least one including bevacizumab (25 March 2026
- no accelerated-approval wording)
- and bevacizumab with paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan after no more than two prior regimens (14 November 2014
- a replacement letter corrects wording omitted from the original). The EMA Elahere page states a marketing authorisation issued on 14 November 2024. The ASCO living guideline (abstract read) strongly recommends mirvetuximab soravtansine for high-grade platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory disease with validated folate receptor alpha expression, and lists pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, weekly or three-weekly paclitaxel, bevacizumab with chemotherapy, and relacorilant with nab-paclitaxel as other options
- the ESMO Express Update (full text read) recommends mirvetuximab soravtansine for high-grade serous disease with a platinum-free interval under 6 months, high folate receptor alpha expression (at least 75% of viable tumour cells with 2+ or 3+ staining) and one to three prior systemic lines [I, A]. No guideline text read here addresses pembrolizumab in this setting
- FDA 2022FDA 2024US Food and Drug Administration 2026FDA 2026FDA 2026FDA 2014EMA 2026Guideline: Lesnock JL, Temin S, Bouberhan S, Adams SF, Barber EL, Burkett WC, et al 2026Guideline: González-Martín A, Ledermann JA 2026
- Relapsed / refractory
- Recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer. FDA granted accelerated approval to the avutometinib and defactinib co-pack for adults with KRAS-mutated recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer who have received prior systemic therapy on 8 May 2025 (letter read; it names RAMP 301 as the confirmatory trial and does not name RAMP 201). The 2026 Mekinist (trametinib) label read has no low-grade serous ovarian cancer indication; the only ovarian mention is a row in its BRAF V600E solid-tumour response table. The ASCO living guideline's stated scope is high-grade serous and endometrioid disease, so its abstract does not address this setting.
- FDA 2025FDA 2026Guideline: Lesnock JL, Temin S, Bouberhan S, Adams SF, Barber EL, Burkett WC, et al 2026
Trials to watch
OVHIPEC-2 NCT03772028
In stage III epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or extra-ovarian cancer in people who are candidates for primary cytoreductive surgery, does adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin to primary surgery change overall survival? Registry record: randomised phase 3 with two arms (primary surgery with HIPEC; primary surgery without HIPEC); status active, not recruiting; enrolment 538 (estimated); the single primary outcome listed is overall survival; start 1 January 2020 (actual); estimated primary completion April 2028; no results posted. The design is described in a protocol paper (Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020, PMID 32205449); no efficacy results were found in a PubMed search on 21 October 2026.
GLORIOSA NCT05445778
In high-grade serous platinum-sensitive recurrent disease with high folate receptor alpha expression that has not progressed after second-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, does maintenance mirvetuximab soravtansine with bevacizumab differ in progression-free survival from bevacizumab alone? Registry record: randomised, open-label phase 3; status active, not recruiting; enrolment 520 (actual); the primary outcome listed is progression-free survival; start 15 March 2023 (actual); estimated primary completion April 2027; no results posted. A protocol paper exists (Future Oncol 2024, PMID 39082675); no efficacy results were found in a PubMed search on 21 October 2026.
RAINFOL-02 NCT06619236
In platinum-resistant high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer after one to four prior lines (prior bevacizumab required where available and suitable), does rinatabart sesutecan (Rina-S) differ in progression-free survival from investigator's-choice chemotherapy? Registry record: randomised, open-label phase 3; participants may be enrolled regardless of folate receptor alpha expression; status active, not recruiting; enrolment 584 (actual); the primary outcome listed is progression-free survival; start 7 February 2025 (actual); primary completion listed as 18 August 2026 (actual); no results posted (registry record last updated 28 September 2026). No publication was found in PubMed on 21 October 2026, and a web search on that date found no announcement of phase 3 results; congress and company reports were not otherwise searched.
RAMP 301 NCT06072781
In recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer that has progressed after at least one prior systemic therapy with documented KRAS status, does avutometinib plus defactinib differ in progression-free survival from investigator's choice (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, letrozole or anastrozole)? Registry record: randomised, open-label phase 3 with crossover; the primary outcome listed is progression-free survival by blinded independent central review; status recruiting; enrolment 270 (estimated); start 18 March 2024 (actual); estimated primary completion October 2028; no results posted. It is the confirmatory trial named in the FDA accelerated approval letter of 8 May 2025. A protocol paper exists (Int J Gynecol Cancer 2025, PMID 39375168); no efficacy results were found in a PubMed search on 21 October 2026.
NRG-GY036 NCT06580314
In newly diagnosed stage III or IV BRCA1/2-mutated or HRD-positive ovarian cancer responding to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, is one year of maintenance olaparib, with or without bevacizumab, non-inferior to two years for progression-free survival (the registry's primary objective is stated as a non-inferiority comparison)? Registry record: randomised phase 3 from NRG Oncology (organisation study ID NRG-GY036), two arms of olaparib for up to 2 years (arm I) or 1 year (arm II) with optional bevacizumab for up to 1 year; the primary outcome listed is progression-free survival at least 360 days after randomisation (PFS360); status recruiting; enrolment 880 (estimated); start 12 March 2025 (actual); estimated primary completion 31 December 2034; no results posted. No publication was found in a PubMed search on 21 October 2026.
DESTINY-Ovarian01 NCT06819007
In HER2-expressing (IHC 3+, 2+ or 1+) advanced high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer, does first-line maintenance with trastuzumab deruxtecan plus bevacizumab differ in progression-free survival from bevacizumab alone? Registry record: randomised, open-label phase 3 (ENGOT-ov89 / GOG-3112 and other group identifiers; sponsor study ID DS8201-772); the primary outcome listed is progression-free survival by blinded independent central review in the HER2 IHC 3+/2+ population; status recruiting; enrolment 582 (estimated); start 19 March 2025 (actual); estimated primary completion November 2028; no results posted. No publication was found in a PubMed search on 21 October 2026.
References
Show all 133 references
Loading references… Open the list as a page
Every figure was checked against its primary source to the extent possible. Items that could not be fully confirmed are marked “needs review”. Educational history, not medical advice.
Links open the primary source. A flag marked ⚑ needs review means a value or claim has not yet been independently confirmed.
2006TreatmentChemotherapy
majorLocally advanced
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimal stage III: GOG-172
In 415 eligible women with stage III ovarian cancer and small residual tumours, adding chemotherapy into the abdominal cavity was linked to median survival of about 66 months instead of about 50. Side effects were more common, and only 42 percent finished six cycles of the abdominal regimen.
GOG-172: 429 randomised stage III patients with no residual mass >1.0 cm; IV paclitaxel plus IV cisplatin vs IV paclitaxel plus IP cisplatin and IP paclitaxel. Median PFS 18.3 vs 23.8 months (P=0.05); median OS 49.7 vs 65.6 months (P=0.03, log-rank). 42% of the IP group completed six cycles; grade 3-4 toxicities were more common with IP (P<=0.001). Earlier GOG-104: OS HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.61-0.96).
Standard before
The GOG-172 report describes a platinum-taxane combination as standard chemotherapy for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. Two earlier phase 3 trials had tested intraperitoneal cisplatin: SWOG/GOG-104 (median survival 49 vs 41 months, intraperitoneal vs intravenous cisplatin with intravenous cyclophosphamide; HR 0.76) and GOG-114, whose carboplatin-then-paclitaxel plus intraperitoneal cisplatin regimen had median PFS 28 vs 22 months but was not recommended for routine use by its authors because of greater toxicity.
What changed
The GOG-172 authors concluded that intravenous paclitaxel plus intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel improves survival in patients with optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer. A later trial of intraperitoneal regimens given with bevacizumab, GOG-252, is a separate entry; the two are not compared here.
Why it mattered
GOG-172 reported longer median progression-free and overall survival with an intraperitoneal-containing regimen in small-volume stage III disease, together with more toxicity and worse quality of life during treatment.
Caveats
- The arms differ in route and also in drug exposure: cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intraperitoneally vs 75 mg/m2 intravenously, plus an additional intraperitoneal paclitaxel dose on day 8. The comparison therefore bundles route with dose and schedule differences.
- Only 42% of the intraperitoneal group completed six cycles; grade 3 and 4 pain, fatigue and haematological, gastrointestinal, metabolic and neurological toxic effects were more common with intraperitoneal therapy (P<=0.001).
- Quality of life was significantly worse in the intraperitoneal group before cycle 4 and three to six weeks after treatment, but not one year after treatment.
- The progression-free survival difference had P=0.05 by the log-rank test; the abstract states 415 of 429 randomised patients were eligible. The population is stage III disease with no residual mass greater than 1.0 cm.
- GOG-104 (654 randomised, 546 eligible) and GOG-114 (523 entered, 462 assessable) are cited as published and are not pooled with GOG-172; their controls, regimens and residual-disease limits differ.