S0205
Gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205)
Phase 3N = 745NCT00075686
- Population
- Unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
- Design
- Randomised phase 3 trial of gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus cetuximab in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Primary end point overall survival.
- Primary endpoint
- OS
- Arms
- Gemcitabine plus cetuximab (experimental): Gemcitabine plus cetuximab
- Gemcitabine (control): Gemcitabine alone
- People
- Philip PA
OSHR 1.06 (95% CI 0.91–1.23)Δ median OS+0.4 months
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Gemcitabine plus cetuximab | Gemcitabine | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSEligible patients accrued (745) | primaryPhilip 2010 | median 6.3 months | median 5.9 months | HR 1.06 (95% CI 0.91–1.23)P=.23, one-sided |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Gemcitabine plus cetuximab | Gemcitabine | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSEligible patients accrued (745) | primaryPhilip 2010 | median 6.3 months | median 5.9 months | HR 1.06 (95% CI 0.91–1.23)P=.23, one-sided |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| OS | 1.06 | 0.91–1.23 |
- Gemcitabine plus cetuximab (experimental)
- Gemcitabine (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Gemcitabine plus cetuximab | Gemcitabine |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4 | 64.4% | 62.5% |
| 8 | 41.5% | 39.1% |
| 12 | 26.7% | 24.4% |
| 16 | 17.2% | 15.3% |
Appears in
Sources
Philip PA, Benedetti J, Corless CL, Wong R, O'Reilly EM, Flynn PJ, et al. Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(22):3605-10.