Skip to content
Bending the Curve Trial by Trial
?

S0106

A phase 3 study of gemtuzumab ozogamicin during induction and postconsolidation therapy in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Phase 3N = 637NCT00085709

Population
Younger patients (ClinicalTrials.gov: under age 61) with previously untreated de novo AML (637 registered for induction; 174 randomised after consolidation).
Design
Randomised phase 3. Induction: daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day by continuous infusion on days 1 to 7 plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) 6 mg/m2 on day 4 (DA+GO), versus daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 with cytarabine alone (DA). Patients in complete remission received 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine; those still in remission were randomised to no additional therapy or 3 doses of GO 5 mg/m2 every 28 days. Registered August 2004 to August 2009.
Arms
  • Daunorubicin plus cytarabine (DA) (control): Daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 plus cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day by continuous infusion for 7 days
  • DA plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin (experimental): Daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 plus cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day for 7 days plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin 6 mg/m2 on day 4
People
Petersdorf SH, SWOG
Δ Complete remission rate−1 pointsΔ 60-month RFS+1 pointsΔ 60-month OS−4 pointsDFSHR 1.48
Show the numbers
Results reported for S0106
EndpointAnalysisDA plus gemtuzumab ozogamicinDaunorubicin plus cytarabine (DA)Effect
Complete remission ratePatients randomised at induction (637 registered)primaryPetersdorf 201369%70%P=.59
RFSPatients who achieved complete remissionprimaryPetersdorf 201343% at 5 y42% at 5 yP=.40
OSPatients randomised at induction (637 registered)primaryPetersdorf 201346% at 5 y50% at 5 yP=.85The abstract states the 5-year rates; it does not name the primary endpoint or give confidence intervals.
DFSPatients in remission after consolidation who were randomised to postconsolidation GO or no further therapy (174 patients)primaryPetersdorf 2013——HR 1.48P=.97Hazard ratio and P value exactly as printed in the abstract; the abstract does not give a confidence interval, the direction of the comparison or the test sidedness.
Results reported for S0106
EndpointAnalysisDA plus gemtuzumab ozogamicinDaunorubicin plus cytarabine (DA)Effect
Complete remission ratePatients randomised at induction (637 registered)primaryPetersdorf 201369%70%P=.59
RFSPatients who achieved complete remissionprimaryPetersdorf 201343% at 5 y42% at 5 yP=.40
OSPatients randomised at induction (637 registered)primaryPetersdorf 201346% at 5 y50% at 5 yP=.85The abstract states the 5-year rates; it does not name the primary endpoint or give confidence intervals.
DFSPatients in remission after consolidation who were randomised to postconsolidation GO or no further therapy (174 patients)primaryPetersdorf 2013——HR 1.48P=.97Hazard ratio and P value exactly as printed in the abstract; the abstract does not give a confidence interval, the direction of the comparison or the test sidedness.
Primary publication: Petersdorf SH, Kopecky KJ, Slovak M, Willman C, Nevill T, Brandwein J, et al. A phase 3 study of gemtuzumab ozogamicin during induction and postconsolidation therapy in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;121(24):4854-60. PubMedDOI

Appears in

Sources

  1. Petersdorf SH, Kopecky KJ, Slovak M, Willman C, Nevill T, Brandwein J, et al. A phase 3 study of gemtuzumab ozogamicin during induction and postconsolidation therapy in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;121(24):4854-60.

    PubMedDOI