SunRISe-1
TAR-200 for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results from the phase IIb SunRISe-1 study
Phase 2NCT04640623
- Population
- Adults with BCG-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer ineligible for or refusing radical cystectomy: carcinoma in situ with or without papillary disease (cohorts 1-3) or papillary disease only (cohort 4).
- Design
- Phase IIb parallel-cohort study at 142 sites in 14 countries (enrolment March 2021 to April 2024) in BCG-unresponsive high-risk NMIBC ineligible for or refusing radical cystectomy. Carcinoma in situ (with or without papillary disease): TAR-200 alone (cohort 2), TAR-200 plus cetrelimab (cohort 1) or cetrelimab alone (cohort 3). Papillary disease only: TAR-200 alone (cohort 4). TAR-200 dosed through month 24 and cetrelimab through month 18. Primary endpoints: centrally confirmed overall complete response rate (cohorts 1-3) and disease-free survival rate (cohort 4). Data cutoff 31 March 2025. Per the full text, the three CIS cohorts were originally designed to enrol 200 patients randomly assigned 2:1:1 to cohorts 1, 2 and 3; in June 2023 enrolment in cohorts 1 and 3 was closed, the TAR-200 alone cohort was expanded to about 80 patients and cohort 4 was added. The paper reports no statistical comparisons between cohorts.
- Primary endpoint
- Complete response in carcinoma in situ, DFS
- Arms
- Cohort 1: TAR-200 plus cetrelimab (experimental, n = 53): TAR-200 (through month 24) plus cetrelimab (through month 18)
- Cohort 2: TAR-200 alone (experimental, n = 85): TAR-200 through month 24
- Cohort 3: cetrelimab alone (experimental, n = 28): Cetrelimab through month 18
- Cohort 4: TAR-200 alone, papillary disease only (experimental, n = 52): TAR-200 through month 24
- People
- Daneshmand S
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Cohort 1: TAR-200 plus cetrelimab / Cohort 2: TAR-200 alone / Cohort 3: cetrelimab alone / Cohort 4: TAR-200 alone, papillary disease only | Control | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete response in carcinoma in situAll enrolled patients who received at least one dose, with BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ in cohorts 1-3 (cohort 2 N=85, cohort 1 N=53, cohort 3 N=28); the paper does not label this intention-to-treatCentrally confirmed overall complete response rate | primaryDaneshmand 2025 | 82.4% (72.6–89.8%) | — | Cohort 2: 70 of 85 patients (full text). The cohorts were not statistically compared with each other (full text); the paper's conclusion favours TAR-200 alone on risk-benefit. |
| DORCohort 2 responders | primaryDaneshmand 2025 | median 25.8 months | — | 95% confidence interval 8.3 months to not estimable (upper bound not stored as a number). Median follow-up in responders 20.2 months (range 5-48); 37 of 70 responders had a duration of response of 12 months or more (full text Table 2). |
| DFSCohort 4: treated patients with BCG-unresponsive high-risk papillary disease only | primaryDaneshmand 2025 | 85.3% at 6 mo (71.6–92.7%); 81.1% at 9 mo (66.7–89.7%); 70.2% at 12 mo (51.6–82.8%) | — | Median DFS not estimable after median follow-up 12.8 months (range 4-17) (full text). |
| Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse eventsTreated patients in each cohort | primaryDaneshmand 2025 | 12.9% | — | Serious treatment-related adverse events 5.9%, 5.8%, 15.1% and 3.6% in cohorts 2, 4, 1 and 3 respectively. No treatment-related deaths. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Cohort 1: TAR-200 plus cetrelimab / Cohort 2: TAR-200 alone / Cohort 3: cetrelimab alone / Cohort 4: TAR-200 alone, papillary disease only | Control | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete response in carcinoma in situAll enrolled patients who received at least one dose, with BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ in cohorts 1-3 (cohort 2 N=85, cohort 1 N=53, cohort 3 N=28); the paper does not label this intention-to-treatCentrally confirmed overall complete response rate | primaryDaneshmand 2025 | 82.4% (72.6–89.8%) | — | Cohort 2: 70 of 85 patients (full text). The cohorts were not statistically compared with each other (full text); the paper's conclusion favours TAR-200 alone on risk-benefit. |
| DORCohort 2 responders | primaryDaneshmand 2025 | median 25.8 months | — | 95% confidence interval 8.3 months to not estimable (upper bound not stored as a number). Median follow-up in responders 20.2 months (range 5-48); 37 of 70 responders had a duration of response of 12 months or more (full text Table 2). |
| DFSCohort 4: treated patients with BCG-unresponsive high-risk papillary disease only | primaryDaneshmand 2025 | 85.3% at 6 mo (71.6–92.7%); 81.1% at 9 mo (66.7–89.7%); 70.2% at 12 mo (51.6–82.8%) | — | Median DFS not estimable after median follow-up 12.8 months (range 4-17) (full text). |
| Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse eventsTreated patients in each cohort | primaryDaneshmand 2025 | 12.9% | — | Serious treatment-related adverse events 5.9%, 5.8%, 15.1% and 3.6% in cohorts 2, 4, 1 and 3 respectively. No treatment-related deaths. |
- Cohort 2: TAR-200 alone (experimental)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Cohort 2: TAR-200 alone |
|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% |
| 16 | 65.1% |
| 32 | 42.3% |
| 48 | 27.5% |
| 65 | 17.4% |
- Cohort 4: TAR-200 alone, papillary disease only (experimental)
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Cohort 4: TAR-200 alone, papillary disease only |
|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% |
| 3 | 92.3% |
| 6 | 85.3% |
| 10 | 78.0% |
| 13 | 70.2% |