SEQUOIA
Zanubrutinib versus bendamustine and rituximab in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma
Phase 3N = 590NCT03336333
- Population
- Untreated CLL or SLL requiring treatment, age 65 or older or age 18 or older with comorbidities, ECOG performance status 0-2
- Design
- Open-label, multicentre phase 3 study at 153 hospitals in 14 countries and regions; 590 patients enrolled. Patients without del(17)(p13.1) were randomly assigned to zanubrutinib (group A) or bendamustine-rituximab (group B); patients with del(17)(p13.1) were enrolled in group C and received zanubrutinib (not randomised). Primary endpoint PFS per independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population of groups A and B.
- Primary endpoint
- PFS
- Arms
- Zanubrutinib (group A) (experimental, n = 241): Zanubrutinib 160 mg orally twice per day in 28-day cycles
- Bendamustine-rituximab (group B) (control, n = 238): Bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 for six cycles plus rituximab 375 mg/m2 then 500 mg/m2
- Zanubrutinib, del(17p) (group C, not randomised) (experimental, n = 111): Zanubrutinib 160 mg orally twice per day in 28-day cycles
- People
- Tam CS
PFSHR 0.42 (95% CI 0.28–0.63)
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Zanubrutinib (group A) / Zanubrutinib, del(17p) (group C, not randomised) | Bendamustine-rituximab (group B) | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSITT (groups A and B, patients without del(17p)) | primarymedian follow-up 26.2 monthsTam 2022 | — | — | HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.28–0.63)P<0.0001Median PFS per independent review committee not reached in either group (group B 95% CI 28.1 months to not estimable). Two-sided P. Group C (del(17p), n=111) is not part of this comparison. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Zanubrutinib (group A) / Zanubrutinib, del(17p) (group C, not randomised) | Bendamustine-rituximab (group B) | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSITT (groups A and B, patients without del(17p)) | primarymedian follow-up 26.2 monthsTam 2022 | — | — | HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.28–0.63)P<0.0001Median PFS per independent review committee not reached in either group (group B 95% CI 28.1 months to not estimable). Two-sided P. Group C (del(17p), n=111) is not part of this comparison. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| PFS | 0.42 | 0.28–0.63 |