RUBY
Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel versus placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (RUBY, ENGOT-EN6-NSGO/GOG-3031), Part 1
Phase 3N = 494NCT03981796
- Population
- Adults with primary advanced (stage III or IV) or first recurrent endometrial cancer; 118 of 494 randomised had dMMR/MSI-H tumours
- Design
- Global, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, Part 1; randomised 1:1. Dostarlimab 500 mg or placebo with carboplatin and paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, then dostarlimab 1000 mg or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 3 years. The FDA notice states that randomisation was stratified by MMR/MSI status, prior external pelvic radiotherapy and disease status. ClinicalTrials.gov lists 785 participants for Parts 1 and 2 together; the papers report 494 randomised in Part 1.
- Primary endpoint
- PFS, OS
- Arms
- Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (experimental, n = 245): Dostarlimab 500 mg plus carboplatin (AUC 5 mg per mL per min) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, then dostarlimab 1000 mg every 6 weeks for up to 3 years
- Placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (control, n = 249): Placebo plus carboplatin (AUC 5 mg per mL per min) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, then placebo every 6 weeks for up to 3 years
- People
- Mirza MR, ENGOT-EN6-NSGO/GOG-3031
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel | Placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSdMMR/MSI-H population (118 of 494 randomised)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1 | primaryMirza 2023 | 61.4% at 2 y (46.3–73.4%) | 15.7% at 2 y (7.2–27.0%) | HR 0.28 (95% CI 0.16–0.50)P<0.001Estimated progression-free survival at 24 months, first interim analysis. Hazard ratio for progression or death. |
| PFSAll randomised patients (N = 494)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1 | primaryMirza 2023 | 36.1% at 2 y (29.3–42.9%) | 18.1% at 2 y (13.0–23.9%) | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.51–0.80)P<0.001Estimated progression-free survival at 24 months, first interim analysis. |
| OSAll randomised patients (N = 494) | interimMirza 2023 | 71.3% at 2 y (64.5–77.1%) | 56% at 2 y (48.9–62.5%) | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.46–0.87)First interim analysis; the abstract states no P value for overall survival. The second interim analysis is a separate result. |
| OSAll randomised patients (N = 494) | interimPowell 2024 | — | — | HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.54–0.89)P=0.0020Second interim analysis at 51% maturity: 245 randomised to dostarlimab and 249 to placebo. The authors report that the trial met the overall survival dual primary endpoint at this analysis. |
| OSdMMR/MSI-H population (118 of 494 randomised) | interimPowell 2024 | — | — | HR 0.32 (95% CI 0.17–0.63)P=0.0002 (nominal)Second interim analysis; subgroup result with a nominal P value. |
| OSpMMR/MSS population (subgroup of the 494 randomised) | interimPowell 2024 | — | — | HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.60–1.04)P=0.0493 (nominal)Second interim analysis; the authors describe a trend in favour of dostarlimab in this subgroup. |
| OSAll randomised patients (N = 494) | interimSource 2024 | median 44.6 months | median 28.2 months (22.1–35.6) | HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.54–0.89)P=0.002 (1-sided)The FDA notice gives the 95% CI of the dostarlimab-arm median as 32.6 months to not reached; the upper bound is not encoded here. The notice does not name the data cut-off; its hazard ratio matches the second interim analysis. |
| PFSAll randomised patients (N = 494)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1 | interimSource 2024 | median 11.8 months (9.6–17.1) | median 7.9 months (7.6–9.5) | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.51–0.80)P<0.0001 (1-sided)The notice does not name the data cut-off. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel | Placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSdMMR/MSI-H population (118 of 494 randomised)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1 | primaryMirza 2023 | 61.4% at 2 y (46.3–73.4%) | 15.7% at 2 y (7.2–27.0%) | HR 0.28 (95% CI 0.16–0.50)P<0.001Estimated progression-free survival at 24 months, first interim analysis. Hazard ratio for progression or death. |
| PFSAll randomised patients (N = 494)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1 | primaryMirza 2023 | 36.1% at 2 y (29.3–42.9%) | 18.1% at 2 y (13.0–23.9%) | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.51–0.80)P<0.001Estimated progression-free survival at 24 months, first interim analysis. |
| OSAll randomised patients (N = 494) | interimMirza 2023 | 71.3% at 2 y (64.5–77.1%) | 56% at 2 y (48.9–62.5%) | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.46–0.87)First interim analysis; the abstract states no P value for overall survival. The second interim analysis is a separate result. |
| OSAll randomised patients (N = 494) | interimPowell 2024 | — | — | HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.54–0.89)P=0.0020Second interim analysis at 51% maturity: 245 randomised to dostarlimab and 249 to placebo. The authors report that the trial met the overall survival dual primary endpoint at this analysis. |
| OSdMMR/MSI-H population (118 of 494 randomised) | interimPowell 2024 | — | — | HR 0.32 (95% CI 0.17–0.63)P=0.0002 (nominal)Second interim analysis; subgroup result with a nominal P value. |
| OSpMMR/MSS population (subgroup of the 494 randomised) | interimPowell 2024 | — | — | HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.60–1.04)P=0.0493 (nominal)Second interim analysis; the authors describe a trend in favour of dostarlimab in this subgroup. |
| OSAll randomised patients (N = 494) | interimSource 2024 | median 44.6 months | median 28.2 months (22.1–35.6) | HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.54–0.89)P=0.002 (1-sided)The FDA notice gives the 95% CI of the dostarlimab-arm median as 32.6 months to not reached; the upper bound is not encoded here. The notice does not name the data cut-off; its hazard ratio matches the second interim analysis. |
| PFSAll randomised patients (N = 494)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1 | interimSource 2024 | median 11.8 months (9.6–17.1) | median 7.9 months (7.6–9.5) | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.51–0.80)P<0.0001 (1-sided)The notice does not name the data cut-off. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| PFS | 0.28 | 0.16–0.5 |
| PFS | 0.64 | 0.51–0.8 |
| OS | 0.64 | 0.46–0.87 |
| OS | 0.69 | 0.54–0.89 |
| OS | 0.32 | 0.17–0.63 |
| OS | 0.79 | 0.6–1.04 |
| OS | 0.69 | 0.54–0.89 |
| PFS | 0.64 | 0.51–0.8 |
- Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (experimental)
- Placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel | Placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 28 | 64.7% | 50.2% |
| 56 | 41.9% | 25.2% |
| 84 | 27.1% | 12.7% |
| 112 | 17.5% | 6.4% |
- Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (experimental)
- Placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel | Placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 7 | 66.3% | 54.1% |
| 15 | 41.4% | 26.8% |
| 22 | 27.5% | 14.5% |
| 30 | 17.2% | 7.2% |
Appears in
Sources
Mirza MR, Chase DM, Slomovitz BM, dePont Christensen R, Novák Z, Black D, et al. Dostarlimab for Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(23):2145-2158.
Powell MA, Bjørge L, Willmott L, Novák Z, Black D, Gilbert L, et al. Overall survival in patients with endometrial cancer treated with dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel in the randomized ENGOT-EN6/GOG-3031/RUBY trial. Ann Oncol. 2024;35(8):728-738.
FDA. FDA expands endometrial cancer indication for dostarlimab-gxly with chemotherapy. FDA notice dated 1 August 2024 (BLA 761174/S-009).