RECOURSE
Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study of TAS-102 Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Chemotherapies
Phase 3N = 800NCT01607957
- Population
- Refractory metastatic colorectal cancer
- Design
- Double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial; 800 patients were randomised 2:1 to TAS-102 (trifluridine plus tipiracil) or placebo. The abstract does not describe best supportive care beyond the registry title.
- Primary endpoint
- OS
- Arms
- Placebo (control): Placebo
- TAS-102 (experimental): TAS-102 (trifluridine plus tipiracil)
- People
- Mayer RJ
OSHR 0.68 (95% CI 0.58–0.81)Δ median OS+1.8 months
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | TAS-102 | Placebo | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSAll randomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract)Overall survival (primary endpoint) | primaryMayer 2015 | median 7.1 months | median 5.3 months | HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.58–0.81)P<0.001 |
| Endpoint | Analysis | TAS-102 | Placebo | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSAll randomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract)Overall survival (primary endpoint) | primaryMayer 2015 | median 7.1 months | median 5.3 months | HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.58–0.81)P<0.001 |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| OS | 0.68 | 0.58–0.81 |
- TAS-102 (experimental)
- Placebo (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | TAS-102 | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4 | 67.7% | 59.3% |
| 9 | 41.5% | 30.8% |
| 13 | 28.1% | 18.3% |
| 18 | 17.3% | 9.5% |