Skip to content
Bending the Curve Trial by Trial
?

Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy vs. conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy

N = 316

Population
Patients with resectable T3-4 rectal carcinoma without sphincter infiltration
Design
Randomised trial in 19 institutions (1999 to 2002) in patients with resectable T3-4 rectal carcinoma without sphincter infiltration and a lesion accessible to digital rectal examination. Short-course arm: 25 Gy in five fractions of 5 Gy, then total mesorectal excision within 7 days. Chemoradiation arm: 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions of 1.8 Gy with two courses of bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin, then total mesorectal excision after 4 to 6 weeks. 316 patients were enrolled according to the 2004 report; the 2006 long-term report states 312 randomised patients with a median follow-up of living patients of 48 months. Surgeons chose the type of operation according to the tumour status at surgery.
Arms
  • Short-course radiotherapy (control): 25 Gy in five fractions of 5 Gy, then total mesorectal excision within 7 days
  • Conventionally fractionated chemoradiation (experimental): 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions of 1.8 Gy with two courses of bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin, then total mesorectal excision after 4 to 6 weeks
People
Bujko K
Δ Sphincter preservation rate−3 pointsΔ 48-month OS−1 pointsΔ DFS−2.8 pointsΔ Local recurrence+5.2 pointsΔ Early radiation toxicity+15 points
Show the numbers
Results reported for Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy vs. conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy
EndpointAnalysisConventionally fractionated chemoradiationShort-course radiotherapyEffect
Sphincter preservation rateEnrolled patients (316 in the 2004 abstract); analysis population not stated in the abstractProportion of patients with a sphincter-preserving operation; the 2004 report states this as its aimprimaryBujko 200458%61%P=0.57The tumour was on average 1.9 cm smaller in patients treated with chemoradiation (P<0.001). Five patients in the chemoradiation group had an abdominoperineal resection despite a clinical complete response.
OSRandomised patients (312 in the 2006 abstract); analysis population not stated in the abstractActuarial 4-year overall survivallong term-updatemedian follow-up 48 monthsBujko 200666.2% at 4 y67.2% at 4 yP=0.960
DFSRandomised patients (312 in the 2006 abstract); analysis population not stated in the abstractDisease-free survival; the abstract does not state a time point for this ratelong term-updatemedian follow-up 48 monthsBujko 200655.6%58.4%P=0.820
Local recurrenceRandomised patients (312 in the 2006 abstract); analysis population not stated in the abstractCrude incidence of local recurrencelong term-updatemedian follow-up 48 monthsBujko 200614.2%9%P=0.170
Early radiation toxicityRandomised patients (312 in the 2006 abstract); analysis population not stated in the abstractlong term-updateBujko 200618.2%3.2%P<0.001Severe late toxicity was 10.1% with short-course radiotherapy and 7.1% with chemoradiation (P=0.360).
Results reported for Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy vs. conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy
EndpointAnalysisConventionally fractionated chemoradiationShort-course radiotherapyEffect
Sphincter preservation rateEnrolled patients (316 in the 2004 abstract); analysis population not stated in the abstractProportion of patients with a sphincter-preserving operation; the 2004 report states this as its aimprimaryBujko 200458%61%P=0.57The tumour was on average 1.9 cm smaller in patients treated with chemoradiation (P<0.001). Five patients in the chemoradiation group had an abdominoperineal resection despite a clinical complete response.
OSRandomised patients (312 in the 2006 abstract); analysis population not stated in the abstractActuarial 4-year overall survivallong term-updatemedian follow-up 48 monthsBujko 200666.2% at 4 y67.2% at 4 yP=0.960
DFSRandomised patients (312 in the 2006 abstract); analysis population not stated in the abstractDisease-free survival; the abstract does not state a time point for this ratelong term-updatemedian follow-up 48 monthsBujko 200655.6%58.4%P=0.820
Local recurrenceRandomised patients (312 in the 2006 abstract); analysis population not stated in the abstractCrude incidence of local recurrencelong term-updatemedian follow-up 48 monthsBujko 200614.2%9%P=0.170
Early radiation toxicityRandomised patients (312 in the 2006 abstract); analysis population not stated in the abstractlong term-updateBujko 200618.2%3.2%P<0.001Severe late toxicity was 10.1% with short-course radiotherapy and 7.1% with chemoradiation (P=0.360).
Primary publication: Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Michalski W, Bebenek M, Pudełko M, et al. Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy vs. conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2004;72(1):15-24. PubMedDOI

Appears in

Sources

  1. Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Michalski W, Bebenek M, Pudełko M, et al. Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy vs. conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2004;72(1):15-24.

    PubMedDOI

  2. Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Michalski W, Bebenek M, Kryj M. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short-course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93(10):1215-23.

    PubMedDOI