Is there a benefit of oxaliplatin in combination with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer? An updated meta-analysis
Phase meta-analysisN = 5,782
- Population
- Patients with stage II or III rectal cancer in seven randomised trials
- Design
- Published meta-analysis of published data (PubMed and Cochrane Library screened in May 2021 for trials published to March 2021, plus ESMO, ESTRO, ASCO, ASTRO and ESSO conference abstracts) of randomised trials adding oxaliplatin to preoperative chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: seven trials (ACCORD-12, CAO/ARO/AIO-04, FOWARC, JIAO, NSABP R-04, PETACC-6 and STAR-01, as listed in the open-access full text) with 5782 stage II or III patients, 2727 given oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and 3055 given fluorouracil alone. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival.
- Primary endpoint
- DFS
- Arms
- Fluoropyrimidine alone (control, n = 3,055): Fluorouracil-based or capecitabine-based regimens without oxaliplatin (pooled across the included trials)
- Oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine (experimental, n = 2,727): Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based or capecitabine-based regimens (pooled across the included trials)
- People
- Des Guetz G
DFSHR 0.90 (95% CI 0.81–0.99)OSHR 0.94 (95% CI 0.83–1.06)Δ pCR+3.2 pointsΔ Local recurrence−1.1 points
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine | Fluoropyrimidine alone | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFSSeven randomised trials, 5782 patientsDisease-free survival, pooled hazard ratio of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil versus fluorouracil alone | exploratoryDes 2021 | — | — | HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.81–0.99)P=0.03 |
| OSSeven randomised trials, 5782 patientsOverall survival, pooled hazard ratio of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil versus fluorouracil alone | exploratoryDes 2021 | — | — | HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.83–1.06)P=0.53 |
| pCRSeven randomised trials reporting pCR (5386 patients)Pathological complete response, pooled rates | exploratoryDes 2021 | 17.9% | 14.7% | P=0.002Risk ratio 1.21 (95% CI 1.07-1.37) in the full text; the abstract labels it an odds ratio of 1.21 (1.07-1.37). |
| Local recurrenceFour randomised trials reporting local recurrence (3635 patients)Local recurrence, pooled rates | exploratoryDes 2021 | 7% | 8.1% | P=0.19Risk ratio 0.86 (95% CI 0.68-1.08), not statistically significant. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine | Fluoropyrimidine alone | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFSSeven randomised trials, 5782 patientsDisease-free survival, pooled hazard ratio of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil versus fluorouracil alone | exploratoryDes 2021 | — | — | HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.81–0.99)P=0.03 |
| OSSeven randomised trials, 5782 patientsOverall survival, pooled hazard ratio of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil versus fluorouracil alone | exploratoryDes 2021 | — | — | HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.83–1.06)P=0.53 |
| pCRSeven randomised trials reporting pCR (5386 patients)Pathological complete response, pooled rates | exploratoryDes 2021 | 17.9% | 14.7% | P=0.002Risk ratio 1.21 (95% CI 1.07-1.37) in the full text; the abstract labels it an odds ratio of 1.21 (1.07-1.37). |
| Local recurrenceFour randomised trials reporting local recurrence (3635 patients)Local recurrence, pooled rates | exploratoryDes 2021 | 7% | 8.1% | P=0.19Risk ratio 0.86 (95% CI 0.68-1.08), not statistically significant. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| DFS | 0.9 | 0.81–0.99 |
| OS | 0.94 | 0.83–1.06 |