Skip to content
Bending the Curve Trial by Trial
?

NRG-GY018

Pembrolizumab versus placebo added to paclitaxel and carboplatin in stage III-IV or recurrent endometrial cancer (NRG-GY018, KEYNOTE-868)

Phase 3N = 816NCT03914612

Population
Newly diagnosed stage III or IVA endometrial cancer with measurable disease, or stage IVB or recurrent disease, of any histology except carcinosarcoma; previous adjuvant chemotherapy allowed if the chemotherapy-free interval was at least 12 months
Design
Double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, randomised 1:1 within two independent cohorts defined by central immunohistochemistry (dMMR and pMMR). Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin (AUC 5) with pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, then pembrolizumab 400 mg or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 14 cycles. Stratified by MMR status, ECOG performance status and previous adjuvant chemotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov lists 813 participants; the NEJM paper reports 816 enrolled (225 in the dMMR cohort, 591 in the pMMR cohort) and the Nature Medicine paper 810.
Primary endpoint
PFS
Arms
  • Pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel-carboplatin (experimental): Pembrolizumab 200 mg plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin (AUC 5) every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, then pembrolizumab 400 mg every 6 weeks for up to 14 cycles
  • Placebo plus paclitaxel-carboplatin (control): Placebo plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin (AUC 5) every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, then placebo every 6 weeks for up to 14 cycles
People
Eskander RN, NRG Oncology
PFSHR 0.30 (95% CI 0.19–0.48)Δ 12-month PFS+36 pointsPFSHR 0.54 (95% CI 0.41–0.71)Δ median PFS+4.4 monthsPFSHR 0.34 (95% CI 0.22–0.53)PFSHR 0.57 (95% CI 0.44–0.74)
Show the numbers
Results reported for NRG-GY018
EndpointAnalysisPembrolizumab plus paclitaxel-carboplatinPlacebo plus paclitaxel-carboplatinEffect
PFSdMMR cohort (centrally determined; analysis cohort of the NEJM report)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1primarymedian follow-up 12 monthsEskander 202374% at 12 mo38% at 12 moHR 0.30 (95% CI 0.19–0.48)P<0.001Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from progression or death at 12 months.
PFSpMMR cohort (centrally determined; analysis cohort of the NEJM report)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1primarymedian follow-up 7.9 monthsEskander 2023median 13.1 monthsmedian 8.7 monthsHR 0.54 (95% CI 0.41–0.71)P<0.001
PFSdMMR population, intention-to-treat as stated in the Nature Medicine report (n = 222: 110 pembrolizumab, 112 placebo)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1interimmedian follow-up 14.4 monthsEskander 2025—median 8.3 months (6.5–12.3)HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.22–0.53)P<0.0001Median PFS was not reached in the pembrolizumab arm. The Nature Medicine report gives different numbers from the NEJM report (HR 0.30) for the same interim data cut-off; the paper states an intention-to-treat analysis with 29 events (26.4%) in the pembrolizumab group and 60 (53.6%) in the placebo group.
PFSpMMR population, intention-to-treat as stated in the Nature Medicine report (n = 588: 294 pembrolizumab, 294 placebo)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1interimmedian follow-up 10 monthsEskander 2025median 13.1 months (10.6–19.5)median 8.7 months (8.4–11.0)HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.44–0.74)P<0.0001The Nature Medicine report gives a different hazard ratio from the NEJM report (0.54) for the same interim data cut-off; events were 95 (32.3%) with pembrolizumab and 138 (46.9%) with placebo.
OSdMMR population (n = 222)interimEskander 2025——HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.25–1.19)P=0.0617 (1-sided, nominal)Immature: information fraction 18.0% (10 deaths with pembrolizumab, 17 with placebo).
OSpMMR population (n = 588)interimEskander 2025——HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.53–1.17)P=0.1157 (1-sided, nominal)Immature: information fraction 27.2% (45 deaths with pembrolizumab, 54 with placebo).
OSdMMR population (ad hoc analysis)exploratorymedian follow-up 22.5 monthsEskander 2025——HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.31–1.04)P=0.0323 (1-sided, nominal)Ad hoc analysis, information fraction 29.3% (17 deaths with pembrolizumab, 27 with placebo).
OSpMMR population (ad hoc analysis)exploratorymedian follow-up 20.8 monthsEskander 2025——HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.59–1.08)P=0.0683 (1-sided, nominal)Ad hoc analysis, information fraction 46.4% (77 deaths with pembrolizumab, 92 with placebo).
PFSdMMR population (n = 222)Progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central reviewexploratoryEskander 2025—median 14.1 monthsHR 0.45 (95% CI 0.27–0.73)P=0.0005 (1-sided, nominal)Exploratory endpoint. Median PFS was not reached with pembrolizumab; the placebo-arm median has a 95% CI of 8.5 months to not reached, which is not encoded here.
PFSpMMR population (n = 588)Progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central reviewexploratoryEskander 2025median 19.5 months (13.1–28.0)median 11 months (9.0–11.5)HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.49–0.85)P=0.0008 (1-sided, nominal)Exploratory endpoint.
Results reported for NRG-GY018
EndpointAnalysisPembrolizumab plus paclitaxel-carboplatinPlacebo plus paclitaxel-carboplatinEffect
PFSdMMR cohort (centrally determined; analysis cohort of the NEJM report)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1primarymedian follow-up 12 monthsEskander 202374% at 12 mo38% at 12 moHR 0.30 (95% CI 0.19–0.48)P<0.001Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from progression or death at 12 months.
PFSpMMR cohort (centrally determined; analysis cohort of the NEJM report)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1primarymedian follow-up 7.9 monthsEskander 2023median 13.1 monthsmedian 8.7 monthsHR 0.54 (95% CI 0.41–0.71)P<0.001
PFSdMMR population, intention-to-treat as stated in the Nature Medicine report (n = 222: 110 pembrolizumab, 112 placebo)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1interimmedian follow-up 14.4 monthsEskander 2025—median 8.3 months (6.5–12.3)HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.22–0.53)P<0.0001Median PFS was not reached in the pembrolizumab arm. The Nature Medicine report gives different numbers from the NEJM report (HR 0.30) for the same interim data cut-off; the paper states an intention-to-treat analysis with 29 events (26.4%) in the pembrolizumab group and 60 (53.6%) in the placebo group.
PFSpMMR population, intention-to-treat as stated in the Nature Medicine report (n = 588: 294 pembrolizumab, 294 placebo)Investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to RECIST 1.1interimmedian follow-up 10 monthsEskander 2025median 13.1 months (10.6–19.5)median 8.7 months (8.4–11.0)HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.44–0.74)P<0.0001The Nature Medicine report gives a different hazard ratio from the NEJM report (0.54) for the same interim data cut-off; events were 95 (32.3%) with pembrolizumab and 138 (46.9%) with placebo.
OSdMMR population (n = 222)interimEskander 2025——HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.25–1.19)P=0.0617 (1-sided, nominal)Immature: information fraction 18.0% (10 deaths with pembrolizumab, 17 with placebo).
OSpMMR population (n = 588)interimEskander 2025——HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.53–1.17)P=0.1157 (1-sided, nominal)Immature: information fraction 27.2% (45 deaths with pembrolizumab, 54 with placebo).
OSdMMR population (ad hoc analysis)exploratorymedian follow-up 22.5 monthsEskander 2025——HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.31–1.04)P=0.0323 (1-sided, nominal)Ad hoc analysis, information fraction 29.3% (17 deaths with pembrolizumab, 27 with placebo).
OSpMMR population (ad hoc analysis)exploratorymedian follow-up 20.8 monthsEskander 2025——HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.59–1.08)P=0.0683 (1-sided, nominal)Ad hoc analysis, information fraction 46.4% (77 deaths with pembrolizumab, 92 with placebo).
PFSdMMR population (n = 222)Progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central reviewexploratoryEskander 2025—median 14.1 monthsHR 0.45 (95% CI 0.27–0.73)P=0.0005 (1-sided, nominal)Exploratory endpoint. Median PFS was not reached with pembrolizumab; the placebo-arm median has a 95% CI of 8.5 months to not reached, which is not encoded here.
PFSpMMR population (n = 588)Progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central reviewexploratoryEskander 2025median 19.5 months (13.1–28.0)median 11 months (9.0–11.5)HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.49–0.85)P=0.0008 (1-sided, nominal)Exploratory endpoint.
Hazard ratio (95% CI) by endpoint. Values below 1 favour the experimental arm.
PFSPFSPFSPFSOSOSOSOSPFSPFS0.512◀ experimentalcontrol ▶
Data table
EndpointHR95% CI
PFS0.30.19–0.48
PFS0.540.41–0.71
PFS0.340.22–0.53
PFS0.570.44–0.74
OS0.550.25–1.19
OS0.790.53–1.17
OS0.570.31–1.04
OS0.80.59–1.08
PFS0.450.27–0.73
PFS0.640.49–0.85
Illustrative — modelled from reported values, not trial data. PFS, primary.
0%25%50%75%100%051015202530Months (modelled)
  • Pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel-carboplatin (experimental)
  • Placebo plus paclitaxel-carboplatin (control)

Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.

Data table (modelled values)
MonthsPembrolizumab plus paclitaxel-carboplatinPlacebo plus paclitaxel-carboplatin
0100.0%100.0%
865.5%52.9%
1642.9%27.9%
2526.6%13.6%
3317.4%7.2%
Illustrative — modelled from reported values, not trial data. PFS, interim.
0%25%50%75%100%05101520Months (modelled)
  • Placebo plus paclitaxel-carboplatin (control)

Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.

Data table (modelled values)
MonthsPlacebo plus paclitaxel-carboplatin
0100.0%
565.9%
1043.4%
1626.3%
2117.3%
Primary publication: Eskander RN, Sill MW, Beffa L, Moore RG, Hope JM, Musa FB, et al. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(23):2159-2170. PubMedDOI

Appears in

Sources

  1. Eskander RN, Sill MW, Beffa L, Moore RG, Hope JM, Musa FB, et al. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(23):2159-2170.

    PubMedDOI

  2. Eskander RN, Sill MW, Beffa L, Moore RG, Hope JM, Musa FB, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: overall survival and exploratory analyses of the NRG GY018 phase 3 randomized trial. Nat Med. 2025;31(5):1539-1546.

    PubMedDOI