Skip to content
Bending the Curve Trial by Trial
?

NordICC

NordICC: The Northern-European Initiative on Colorectal Cancer

N = 84,585NCT00883792

Population
Presumptively healthy people aged 55 to 64 years; follow-up data were available for 84,585 participants in Poland, Norway and Sweden.
Design
Pragmatic randomised trial; presumptively healthy men and women aged 55 to 64 drawn from population registries in Poland, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands between 2009 and 2014 were randomly assigned 1:2 to an invitation to a single screening colonoscopy or to no invitation or screening (usual care). Primary end points were the risks of colorectal cancer and related death; the secondary end point was death from any cause. The primary report analyses follow-up data from Poland, Norway and Sweden.
Primary endpoint
Colorectal cancer incidence, Colorectal cancer mortality
Arms
  • Invited to colonoscopy (experimental, n = 28,220): Invitation to a single screening colonoscopy
  • Usual care (control, n = 56,365): No invitation and no screening
People
Bretthauer M
Δ Colorectal cancer incidence−0.22 pointsΔ Colorectal cancer mortality−0.03 pointsΔ All-cause mortality−0.01 points
Show the numbers
Results reported for NordICC
EndpointAnalysisInvited to colonoscopyUsual careEffect
Colorectal cancer incidenceIntention-to-screen analysis (Poland, Norway, Sweden)Risk of colorectal cancer at 10 yearsprimarymedian follow-up 10 yearsBretthauer 20220.98%1.2%Intention-to-screen risk ratio 0.82 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.93), an 18% risk reduction; 259 cases in the invited group and 622 in the usual-care group; number needed to invite to prevent one case of colorectal cancer 455 (95% CI 270 to 1429). Risk ratio, not a hazard ratio.
Colorectal cancer mortalityIntention-to-screen analysis (Poland, Norway, Sweden)Risk of death from colorectal cancer at 10 yearsprimarymedian follow-up 10 yearsBretthauer 20220.28%0.31%Intention-to-screen risk ratio 0.90 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.16); the interval includes 1, so the difference was not statistically significant. Risk ratio, not a hazard ratio.
All-cause mortalityIntention-to-screen analysis (Poland, Norway, Sweden)Risk of death from any cause at 10 yearsprimarymedian follow-up 10 yearsBretthauer 202211.03%11.04%Risk ratio 0.99 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.04). Secondary end point. Risk ratio, not a hazard ratio.
Colorectal cancer mortalityPer-protocol effect among people who were screened, estimated by instrumental-variable analysis (participation 42%)Risk of death from colorectal cancer at 10 years, per-protocol effect estimated by instrumental-variable analysisexploratoryShi 2025—0.29% (0.24–0.33%)In screened individuals the estimated 10-year risk was 0.20% (95% CI 0.09 to 0.73) to 0.22% (95% CI 0.08 to 0.37) depending on assumptions, giving risk ratios of 0.71 (95% CI 0.31 to 2.89) to 0.79 (95% CI 0.24 to 1.42). Every interval includes 1. The authors state their earlier per-protocol estimates may be affected by residual confounding, and that the validity of these estimates rests on a different set of assumptions.
Colorectal cancer incidencePer-protocol effect among people who were screened, estimated by instrumental-variable analysis (participation 42%)Risk of colorectal cancer at 10 years, per-protocol effect estimated by instrumental-variable analysisexploratoryShi 2025—1.13% (1.04–1.23%)In screened individuals the estimated 10-year risk was 0.66% to 0.74% (95% CI 0.57 to 0.95 for the upper estimate) depending on assumptions, giving risk ratios of 0.59 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.98) to 0.65 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.87). The authors summarise this as a 35 to 41% reduction in incidence at 10 years.
Results reported for NordICC
EndpointAnalysisInvited to colonoscopyUsual careEffect
Colorectal cancer incidenceIntention-to-screen analysis (Poland, Norway, Sweden)Risk of colorectal cancer at 10 yearsprimarymedian follow-up 10 yearsBretthauer 20220.98%1.2%Intention-to-screen risk ratio 0.82 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.93), an 18% risk reduction; 259 cases in the invited group and 622 in the usual-care group; number needed to invite to prevent one case of colorectal cancer 455 (95% CI 270 to 1429). Risk ratio, not a hazard ratio.
Colorectal cancer mortalityIntention-to-screen analysis (Poland, Norway, Sweden)Risk of death from colorectal cancer at 10 yearsprimarymedian follow-up 10 yearsBretthauer 20220.28%0.31%Intention-to-screen risk ratio 0.90 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.16); the interval includes 1, so the difference was not statistically significant. Risk ratio, not a hazard ratio.
All-cause mortalityIntention-to-screen analysis (Poland, Norway, Sweden)Risk of death from any cause at 10 yearsprimarymedian follow-up 10 yearsBretthauer 202211.03%11.04%Risk ratio 0.99 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.04). Secondary end point. Risk ratio, not a hazard ratio.
Colorectal cancer mortalityPer-protocol effect among people who were screened, estimated by instrumental-variable analysis (participation 42%)Risk of death from colorectal cancer at 10 years, per-protocol effect estimated by instrumental-variable analysisexploratoryShi 2025—0.29% (0.24–0.33%)In screened individuals the estimated 10-year risk was 0.20% (95% CI 0.09 to 0.73) to 0.22% (95% CI 0.08 to 0.37) depending on assumptions, giving risk ratios of 0.71 (95% CI 0.31 to 2.89) to 0.79 (95% CI 0.24 to 1.42). Every interval includes 1. The authors state their earlier per-protocol estimates may be affected by residual confounding, and that the validity of these estimates rests on a different set of assumptions.
Colorectal cancer incidencePer-protocol effect among people who were screened, estimated by instrumental-variable analysis (participation 42%)Risk of colorectal cancer at 10 years, per-protocol effect estimated by instrumental-variable analysisexploratoryShi 2025—1.13% (1.04–1.23%)In screened individuals the estimated 10-year risk was 0.66% to 0.74% (95% CI 0.57 to 0.95 for the upper estimate) depending on assumptions, giving risk ratios of 0.59 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.98) to 0.65 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.87). The authors summarise this as a 35 to 41% reduction in incidence at 10 years.
Primary publication: Bretthauer M, Løberg M, Wieszczy P, Kalager M, Emilsson L, Garborg K, et al. Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(17):1547-1556. PubMedDOI

Appears in

Sources

  1. Bretthauer M, Løberg M, Wieszczy P, Kalager M, Emilsson L, Garborg K, et al. Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(17):1547-1556.

    PubMedDOI

  2. Shi J, Løberg M, Kalager M, Wieszczy P, Pilonis ND, Adami HO, et al. Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death: instrumental variable estimation of per-protocol effects. Eur J Epidemiol. 2025;40(4):419-425.

    PubMedDOI