Skip to content
Bending the Curve Trial by Trial
?

NLST

National Lung Screening Trial: a randomized trial comparing low-dose helical CT with chest X-ray for lung cancer

Phase 3N = 53,454NCT00047385

Population
People aged 55 to 74 years at randomisation with a history of cigarette smoking of at least 30 pack-years who, if former smokers, had quit within the previous 15 years. People with a previous lung cancer diagnosis, a chest CT within 18 months, haemoptysis, or unexplained weight loss of more than 6.8 kg (15 lb) in the preceding year were excluded.
Design
Randomised multicentre trial at 33 US medical centres (10 Lung Screening Study and 23 ACRIN centres). Participants were assigned to three annual screens (baseline, year 1, year 2) with either low-dose CT or single-view posteroanterior chest radiography. Enrolment ran from August 2002 to April 2004; events were counted through 31 December 2009. The primary analysis compared lung-cancer mortality between the two groups by the intention-to-screen principle.
Primary endpoint
Lung cancer mortality
Arms
  • Low-dose CT (experimental, n = 26,722): Three annual screens with low-dose CT
  • Chest radiography (control, n = 26,732): Three annual screens with single-view posteroanterior chest radiography
People
National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, National Lung Screening Trial Research Team
Δ Positive screening test rate+17.3 pointsΔ False-positive share of positive screening results+1.9 points
Show the numbers
Results reported for NLST
EndpointAnalysisLow-dose CTChest radiographyEffect
Positive screening test rateAll screening tests over the three roundsProportion of screening tests classified as positive across all three rounds (counted per test, not per person).primaryNational 201124.2%6.9%Per round (full text, Results): 27.3% vs 9.2% at baseline, 27.9% vs 6.2% at year 1, 16.8% vs 5.0% at year 2. The primary mortality outcome is reported as rates per 100,000 person-years with a relative reduction, not as per-arm percentages; see the milestone figures.
False-positive share of positive screening resultsAll positive screening results over the three roundsProportion of positive screening results that were false positives (the abnormality was not lung cancer), across all three rounds. The paper's main text does not restate its operational definition.primaryNational 201196.4%94.5%—
Results reported for NLST
EndpointAnalysisLow-dose CTChest radiographyEffect
Positive screening test rateAll screening tests over the three roundsProportion of screening tests classified as positive across all three rounds (counted per test, not per person).primaryNational 201124.2%6.9%Per round (full text, Results): 27.3% vs 9.2% at baseline, 27.9% vs 6.2% at year 1, 16.8% vs 5.0% at year 2. The primary mortality outcome is reported as rates per 100,000 person-years with a relative reduction, not as per-arm percentages; see the milestone figures.
False-positive share of positive screening resultsAll positive screening results over the three roundsProportion of positive screening results that were false positives (the abnormality was not lung cancer), across all three rounds. The paper's main text does not restate its operational definition.primaryNational 201196.4%94.5%—
Primary publication: National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395-409. PubMedDOI

Appears in

Sources

  1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395-409.

    PubMedDOI