Phase III randomized trial of conventional-dose chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell rescue as first-line treatment for patients with poor-prognosis metastatic germ cell tumors
Phase 3N = 219
- Population
- Previously untreated patients with intermediate- or poor-risk metastatic germ cell tumours
- Design
- Randomised phase III trial: four cycles of BEP versus two cycles of BEP followed by two cycles of high-dose carboplatin-containing chemotherapy and then haematopoietic stem-cell rescue. Serum tumour marker (AFP, hCG) decline was a prospectively assessed secondary endpoint.
- Arms
- BEP alone (control, n = 111): Four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin
- BEP plus high-dose chemotherapy (experimental, n = 108): Two cycles of BEP followed by two cycles of high-dose chemotherapy containing carboplatin, then haematopoietic stem-cell rescue
- People
- Motzer RJ, senior author Bosl GJ
Δ Durable complete response rate+4 pointsΔ Durable complete response rate+27 points
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | BEP plus high-dose chemotherapy | BEP alone | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Durable complete response rateAll randomised patients (219)1-year durable complete response | primaryMotzer 2007 | 52% | 48% | P=0.53The abstract does not name the primary endpoint; the durable complete response rate is the endpoint it reports for the randomised comparison. |
| Durable complete response rate67 patients with unsatisfactory (slow) tumour marker decline1-year durable complete response | exploratoryMotzer 2007 | 61% | 34% | P=0.03Subgroup defined during treatment by marker decline; not a prespecified randomised comparison of all patients. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | BEP plus high-dose chemotherapy | BEP alone | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Durable complete response rateAll randomised patients (219)1-year durable complete response | primaryMotzer 2007 | 52% | 48% | P=0.53The abstract does not name the primary endpoint; the durable complete response rate is the endpoint it reports for the randomised comparison. |
| Durable complete response rate67 patients with unsatisfactory (slow) tumour marker decline1-year durable complete response | exploratoryMotzer 2007 | 61% | 34% | P=0.03Subgroup defined during treatment by marker decline; not a prespecified randomised comparison of all patients. |
Appears in
Sources
Motzer RJ, Nichols CJ, Margolin KA, Bacik J, Richardson PG, Vogelzang NJ, et al. Phase III randomized trial of conventional-dose chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell rescue as first-line treatment for patients with poor-prognosis metastatic germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(3):247-56.