MAIA
Daratumumab plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Untreated Myeloma (MAIA)
Phase 3N = 737NCT02252172
- Population
- Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation.
- Design
- Phase 3 trial: 737 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation were randomly assigned to daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone, continued until progression or unacceptable side effects. The primary end point was progression-free survival. The primary report (NEJM 2019) and the long-term outcomes paper (Leukemia 2025, median follow-up 64.5 months) are separate analyses.
- Primary endpoint
- PFS
- Arms
- Daratumumab + Rd (experimental, n = 368): Daratumumab with lenalidomide and dexamethasone
- Rd (control, n = 369): Lenalidomide and dexamethasone
- People
- Facon T
PFSHR 0.56 (95% CI 0.43–0.73)Δ 30-month PFS+15 pointsΔ ≥CR rate+22.7 pointsΔ MRD+16.9 pointsPFSHR 0.55 (95% CI 0.45–0.67)Δ median PFS+27.5 months
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Daratumumab + Rd | Rd | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSRandomised patients (737) | primarymedian follow-up 28 monthsFacon 2019 | 70.6% at 30 mo (65.0–75.4%) | 55.6% at 30 mo (49.5–61.3%) | HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.43–0.73)P<0.001Disease progression or death occurred in 97 of 368 patients (26.4%) with daratumumab and 143 of 369 (38.8%) with control. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia 50.0% versus 35.3%; pneumonia 13.7% versus 7.9%. |
| ≥CR rateRandomised patients (737) | primaryFacon 2019 | 47.6% | 24.9% | P<0.001 |
| MRDRandomised patients (737) | primaryFacon 2019 | 24.2% | 7.3% | P<0.001 |
| PFSRandomised patients (737) | long term-updatemedian follow-up 64.5 monthsFacon 2025 | median 61.9 months | median 34.4 months | HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.45–0.67)P<0.0001 |
| OSRandomised patients (737) | long term-updatemedian follow-up 64.5 monthsFacon 2025 | 66.6% at 5 y | median 65.5 months; 53.6% at 5 y | HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.53–0.83)P=0.0003Median overall survival was not reached in the daratumumab group. |
| ≥CR rateRandomised patients (737) | long term-updatemedian follow-up 64.5 monthsFacon 2025 | 51.1% | 30.1% | P<0.0001 |
| MRDRandomised patients (737) | long term-updatemedian follow-up 64.5 monthsFacon 2025 | 32.1% | 11.1% | P<0.0001Sustained MRD negativity (at least 18 months) was 16.8% versus 3.3%. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Daratumumab + Rd | Rd | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSRandomised patients (737) | primarymedian follow-up 28 monthsFacon 2019 | 70.6% at 30 mo (65.0–75.4%) | 55.6% at 30 mo (49.5–61.3%) | HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.43–0.73)P<0.001Disease progression or death occurred in 97 of 368 patients (26.4%) with daratumumab and 143 of 369 (38.8%) with control. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia 50.0% versus 35.3%; pneumonia 13.7% versus 7.9%. |
| ≥CR rateRandomised patients (737) | primaryFacon 2019 | 47.6% | 24.9% | P<0.001 |
| MRDRandomised patients (737) | primaryFacon 2019 | 24.2% | 7.3% | P<0.001 |
| PFSRandomised patients (737) | long term-updatemedian follow-up 64.5 monthsFacon 2025 | median 61.9 months | median 34.4 months | HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.45–0.67)P<0.0001 |
| OSRandomised patients (737) | long term-updatemedian follow-up 64.5 monthsFacon 2025 | 66.6% at 5 y | median 65.5 months; 53.6% at 5 y | HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.53–0.83)P=0.0003Median overall survival was not reached in the daratumumab group. |
| ≥CR rateRandomised patients (737) | long term-updatemedian follow-up 64.5 monthsFacon 2025 | 51.1% | 30.1% | P<0.0001 |
| MRDRandomised patients (737) | long term-updatemedian follow-up 64.5 monthsFacon 2025 | 32.1% | 11.1% | P<0.0001Sustained MRD negativity (at least 18 months) was 16.8% versus 3.3%. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| PFS | 0.56 | 0.43–0.73 |
| PFS | 0.55 | 0.45–0.67 |
| OS | 0.66 | 0.53–0.83 |
- Daratumumab + Rd (experimental)
- Rd (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Daratumumab + Rd | Rd |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 39 | 64.6% | 45.6% |
| 77 | 42.2% | 21.2% |
| 116 | 27.3% | 9.7% |
| 155 | 17.6% | 4.4% |
- Rd (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Rd |
|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% |
| 41 | 64.8% |
| 82 | 42.0% |
| 123 | 27.2% |
| 164 | 17.6% |
Appears in
Sources
Facon T, Kumar S, Plesner T, Orlowski RZ, Moreau P, Bahlis N, et al. Daratumumab plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Untreated Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(22):2104-2115.
Facon T, Moreau P, Weisel K, Goldschmidt H, Usmani SZ, Chari A, et al. Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomes. Leukemia. 2025;39(4):942-950.