LEAP-010
Pembrolizumab with or without lenvatinib as first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Phase 3N = 511NCT04199104
- Population
- PD-L1 CPS 1 or more recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, first line
- Design
- Randomised (1:1), placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study in participants aged 18 years or older with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) 1 or more recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma deemed incurable by local therapy. Lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks, or placebo plus pembrolizumab, for up to 35 cycles. Primary endpoints were objective response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival; ORR and PFS were reported from the first interim analysis (data cut-off 6 July 2022) and OS from the second (data cut-off 30 May 2023).
- Primary endpoint
- ORR, PFS, OS
- Arms
- Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (experimental, n = 256): Lenvatinib 20 mg daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (up to 35 cycles)
- Placebo plus pembrolizumab (control, n = 255): Placebo daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (up to 35 cycles)
- People
- Licitra L, LEAP-010 investigators
PFSHR 0.64 (95% CI 0.50–0.81)Δ median PFS+3.4 monthsΔ ORR+20.7 pointsOSHR 1.15 (95% CI 0.91–1.45)Δ median OS−2.9 months
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab | Placebo plus pembrolizumab | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSParticipants with PD-L1 CPS 1 or more (the abstract does not state the analysis population) | interimLicitra 2026 | median 6.2 months | median 2.8 months | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.50–0.81)P=0.0001040First interim analysis; median time from random assignment to data cut-off 11.5 months. |
| ORRParticipants with PD-L1 CPS 1 or more (the abstract does not state the analysis population) | interimLicitra 2026 | 46.1% | 25.4% | P=0.0000251First interim analysis. Difference in ORR 20.2 percentage points (95% CI 10.5 to 29.6). |
| OSParticipants with PD-L1 CPS 1 or more (the abstract does not state the analysis population) | interimLicitra 2026 | median 15 months | median 17.9 months | HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.91–1.45)P=0.882Second interim analysis; median time from random assignment to data cut-off 21.3 months. The abstract concludes lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab improved ORR and PFS but not OS. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab | Placebo plus pembrolizumab | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSParticipants with PD-L1 CPS 1 or more (the abstract does not state the analysis population) | interimLicitra 2026 | median 6.2 months | median 2.8 months | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.50–0.81)P=0.0001040First interim analysis; median time from random assignment to data cut-off 11.5 months. |
| ORRParticipants with PD-L1 CPS 1 or more (the abstract does not state the analysis population) | interimLicitra 2026 | 46.1% | 25.4% | P=0.0000251First interim analysis. Difference in ORR 20.2 percentage points (95% CI 10.5 to 29.6). |
| OSParticipants with PD-L1 CPS 1 or more (the abstract does not state the analysis population) | interimLicitra 2026 | median 15 months | median 17.9 months | HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.91–1.45)P=0.882Second interim analysis; median time from random assignment to data cut-off 21.3 months. The abstract concludes lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab improved ORR and PFS but not OS. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| PFS | 0.64 | 0.5–0.81 |
| OS | 1.15 | 0.91–1.45 |
- Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (experimental)
- Placebo plus pembrolizumab (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab | Placebo plus pembrolizumab |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4 | 63.9% | 37.1% |
| 8 | 40.9% | 13.8% |
| 12 | 26.1% | 5.1% |
| 16 | 16.7% | 1.9% |
- Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (experimental)
- Placebo plus pembrolizumab (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab | Placebo plus pembrolizumab |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 11 | 60.2% | 65.3% |
| 22 | 36.2% | 42.7% |
| 34 | 20.8% | 26.8% |
| 45 | 12.5% | 17.5% |