Skip to content
Bending the Curve Trial by Trial
?

LACE

Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium (LACE): total laparoscopic versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer

Phase 3N = 760NCT00096408

Population
Women with treatment-naive stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer
Design
Multinational, randomised equivalence trial in which 27 surgeons from 20 tertiary gynaecological cancer centres in Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong randomised 760 women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer between 7 October 2005 and 30 June 2010 to total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH, n = 407) or total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH, n = 353). The primary outcome was disease-free survival at 4.5 years after randomisation, with a prespecified equivalence margin of 7% or less. The trial had two stages: stage 1 compared quality of life up to 6 months after surgery (361 enrolled in the quality-of-life substudy, 332 analysed); stage 2 tested disease-free survival.
Primary endpoint
DFS
Arms
  • Total abdominal hysterectomy (control, n = 353): Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH)
  • Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (experimental, n = 407): Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH)
People
Janda M
Δ 54-month DFS+0.3 pointsΔ Recurrence of endometrial cancer+0.2 pointsΔ All-cause mortality+0.6 pointsΔ Postoperative adverse events of grade 3 or higher−11.6 points
Show the numbers
Results reported for LACE
EndpointAnalysisTotal laparoscopic hysterectomyTotal abdominal hysterectomyEffect
DFSRandomised women (760); analysis population not stated in the abstractInterval between surgery and the date of first recurrence, including disease progression, or the development of a new primary cancer, or death, assessed at 4.5 years after randomisationprimarymedian follow-up 4.5 yearsJanda 201781.6% at 54 mo81.3% at 54 moP=.007Rate difference 0.3% favouring TLH (95% CI -5.5% to 6.1%); the P value is for equivalence against the prespecified 7% margin, which was met. 679 (89%) of 760 completed the trial.
Recurrence of endometrial cancerRandomised women (760); analysis population not stated in the abstractprimaryJanda 20178.1%7.9%P=.9328/353 vs 33/407; risk difference 0.2% (95% CI -3.7% to 4.0%). Secondary outcome.
All-cause mortalityRandomised women (760); analysis population not stated in the abstractprimaryJanda 20177.4%6.8%P=.7624/353 vs 30/407 deaths; the abstract reports these as overall survival, with risk difference 0.6% (95% CI -3.0% to 4.2%). Secondary outcome.
Postoperative adverse events of grade 3 or higherStage 1 quality-of-life substudy, intention to treat (332 analysed: 190 TLH, 142 TAH)interimJanda 201011.6%23.2%P=0.00433/142 vs 22/190. Intraoperative adverse events were similar (TAH 5.6%, TLH 7.4%; P = 0.53).
Results reported for LACE
EndpointAnalysisTotal laparoscopic hysterectomyTotal abdominal hysterectomyEffect
DFSRandomised women (760); analysis population not stated in the abstractInterval between surgery and the date of first recurrence, including disease progression, or the development of a new primary cancer, or death, assessed at 4.5 years after randomisationprimarymedian follow-up 4.5 yearsJanda 201781.6% at 54 mo81.3% at 54 moP=.007Rate difference 0.3% favouring TLH (95% CI -5.5% to 6.1%); the P value is for equivalence against the prespecified 7% margin, which was met. 679 (89%) of 760 completed the trial.
Recurrence of endometrial cancerRandomised women (760); analysis population not stated in the abstractprimaryJanda 20178.1%7.9%P=.9328/353 vs 33/407; risk difference 0.2% (95% CI -3.7% to 4.0%). Secondary outcome.
All-cause mortalityRandomised women (760); analysis population not stated in the abstractprimaryJanda 20177.4%6.8%P=.7624/353 vs 30/407 deaths; the abstract reports these as overall survival, with risk difference 0.6% (95% CI -3.0% to 4.2%). Secondary outcome.
Postoperative adverse events of grade 3 or higherStage 1 quality-of-life substudy, intention to treat (332 analysed: 190 TLH, 142 TAH)interimJanda 201011.6%23.2%P=0.00433/142 vs 22/190. Intraoperative adverse events were similar (TAH 5.6%, TLH 7.4%; P = 0.53).
Primary publication: Janda M, Gebski V, Davies LC, Forder P, Brand A, Hogg R, et al. Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free Survival Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317(12):1224-1233. PubMedDOI

Appears in

Sources

  1. Janda M, Gebski V, Davies LC, Forder P, Brand A, Hogg R, et al. Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free Survival Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317(12):1224-1233.

    PubMedDOI

  2. Janda M, Gebski V, Brand A, Hogg R, Jobling TW, Land R, et al. Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(8):772-80.

    PubMedDOI