KEYNOTE-010
Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Phase 2/3N = 1,034NCT01905657
- Population
- Previously treated NSCLC with PD-L1 on at least 1% of tumour cells
- Design
- Randomised (1:1:1), open-label phase 2/3 study at 202 centres in 24 countries. Pembrolizumab 2 mg per kilogram, pembrolizumab 10 mg per kilogram or docetaxel 75 mg per square metre, each every 3 weeks.
- Primary endpoint
- OS, PFS
- Arms
- Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (experimental, n = 345): Pembrolizumab 2 mg per kilogram every 3 weeks
- Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (experimental, n = 346): Pembrolizumab 10 mg per kilogram every 3 weeks
- Docetaxel (control, n = 343): Docetaxel 75 mg per square metre every 3 weeks
- People
- Herbst RS
OSHR 0.71 (95% CI 0.58–0.88)Δ median OS+1.9 monthsOSHR 0.61 (95% CI 0.49–0.75)Δ median OS+4.2 monthsPFSHR 0.88 (95% CI 0.74–1.05)Δ median PFS−0.1 months
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg / Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg | Docetaxel | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSTotal population (PD-L1 on at least 1% of tumour cells) | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 10.4 months | median 8.5 months | HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.58–0.88)P=0.0008Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg vs docetaxel. By 30 September 2015, 521 patients had died. Dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS in the total population and in patients with PD-L1 on at least 50% of tumour cells. |
| OSTotal population (PD-L1 on at least 1% of tumour cells) | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 12.7 months | median 8.5 months | HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.49–0.75)P<0.0001Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg vs docetaxel. |
| PFSTotal population (PD-L1 on at least 1% of tumour cells) | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 3.9 months | median 4 months | HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.74–1.05)P=0.07Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg vs docetaxel; not significant (threshold p<0.001). |
| PFSTotal population (PD-L1 on at least 1% of tumour cells) | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 4 months | median 4 months | HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.66–0.94)P=0.004Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg vs docetaxel; the abstract notes no significant difference for the 2 mg/kg comparison and gives p=0.004 for this one, against a stated significance threshold of p<0.001. |
| OSPD-L1 on at least 50% of tumour cells | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 14.9 months | median 8.2 months | HR 0.54 (95% CI 0.38–0.77)P=0.0002Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg vs docetaxel. |
| OSPD-L1 on at least 50% of tumour cells | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 17.3 months | median 8.2 months | HR 0.50 (95% CI 0.36–0.70)P<0.0001Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg vs docetaxel. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events: 13% (2 mg/kg), 16% (10 mg/kg) and 35% (docetaxel). |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg / Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg | Docetaxel | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSTotal population (PD-L1 on at least 1% of tumour cells) | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 10.4 months | median 8.5 months | HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.58–0.88)P=0.0008Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg vs docetaxel. By 30 September 2015, 521 patients had died. Dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS in the total population and in patients with PD-L1 on at least 50% of tumour cells. |
| OSTotal population (PD-L1 on at least 1% of tumour cells) | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 12.7 months | median 8.5 months | HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.49–0.75)P<0.0001Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg vs docetaxel. |
| PFSTotal population (PD-L1 on at least 1% of tumour cells) | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 3.9 months | median 4 months | HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.74–1.05)P=0.07Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg vs docetaxel; not significant (threshold p<0.001). |
| PFSTotal population (PD-L1 on at least 1% of tumour cells) | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 4 months | median 4 months | HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.66–0.94)P=0.004Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg vs docetaxel; the abstract notes no significant difference for the 2 mg/kg comparison and gives p=0.004 for this one, against a stated significance threshold of p<0.001. |
| OSPD-L1 on at least 50% of tumour cells | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 14.9 months | median 8.2 months | HR 0.54 (95% CI 0.38–0.77)P=0.0002Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg vs docetaxel. |
| OSPD-L1 on at least 50% of tumour cells | primaryHerbst 2016 | median 17.3 months | median 8.2 months | HR 0.50 (95% CI 0.36–0.70)P<0.0001Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg vs docetaxel. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events: 13% (2 mg/kg), 16% (10 mg/kg) and 35% (docetaxel). |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| OS | 0.71 | 0.58–0.88 |
| OS | 0.61 | 0.49–0.75 |
| PFS | 0.88 | 0.74–1.05 |
| PFS | 0.79 | 0.66–0.94 |
| OS | 0.54 | 0.38–0.77 |
| OS | 0.5 | 0.36–0.7 |
- Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (experimental)
- Docetaxel (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg | Docetaxel |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 7 | 62.7% | 56.5% |
| 13 | 42.0% | 34.6% |
| 20 | 26.4% | 19.6% |
| 26 | 17.7% | 12.0% |
- Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (experimental)
- Docetaxel (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg | Docetaxel |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 8 | 64.6% | 52.1% |
| 16 | 41.8% | 27.1% |
| 24 | 27.0% | 14.1% |
| 32 | 17.4% | 7.4% |