Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group
N = 683
- Population
- Previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer
- Design
- Multicentre randomised three-arm trial: weekly irinotecan 125 mg per square metre with bolus fluorouracil 500 mg per square metre and leucovorin 20 mg per square metre for four weeks every six weeks (IFL); bolus fluorouracil 425 mg per square metre and leucovorin 20 mg per square metre daily for five consecutive days every four weeks; or weekly irinotecan 125 mg per square metre alone for four weeks every six weeks. End points included progression-free survival and overall survival.
- Arms
- Fluorouracil and leucovorin (control, n = 226): Bolus fluorouracil 425 mg per square metre and leucovorin 20 mg per square metre daily for five consecutive days every four weeks
- Irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFL) (experimental, n = 231): Irinotecan 125 mg per square metre, bolus fluorouracil 500 mg per square metre and leucovorin 20 mg per square metre weekly for four weeks every six weeks
- Irinotecan alone (experimental, n = 226): Irinotecan 125 mg per square metre weekly for four weeks every six weeks
- People
- Saltz LB, Irinotecan Study Group
Δ median OS+2.2 monthsΔ median PFS+2.7 monthsΔ ORR+18 points
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFL) / Irinotecan alone | Fluorouracil and leucovorin | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS | primarySaltz 2000 | median 14.8 months | median 12.6 months | P=0.04Comparison of IFL with fluorouracil and leucovorin. Results for irinotecan alone were reported as similar to those for fluorouracil and leucovorin; no values are given in the abstract. |
| PFS | primarySaltz 2000 | median 7 months | median 4.3 months | P=0.004 |
| ORRConfirmed response rate | primarySaltz 2000 | 39% | 21% | P<0.001 |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFL) / Irinotecan alone | Fluorouracil and leucovorin | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS | primarySaltz 2000 | median 14.8 months | median 12.6 months | P=0.04Comparison of IFL with fluorouracil and leucovorin. Results for irinotecan alone were reported as similar to those for fluorouracil and leucovorin; no values are given in the abstract. |
| PFS | primarySaltz 2000 | median 7 months | median 4.3 months | P=0.004 |
| ORRConfirmed response rate | primarySaltz 2000 | 39% | 21% | P<0.001 |
- Fluorouracil and leucovorin (control)
- Irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFL) (experimental)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Fluorouracil and leucovorin | Irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFL) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 9 | 61.0% | 65.6% |
| 19 | 35.2% | 41.1% |
| 28 | 21.4% | 26.9% |
| 37 | 13.1% | 17.7% |
- Fluorouracil and leucovorin (control)
- Irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFL) (experimental)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Fluorouracil and leucovorin | Irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFL) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4 | 52.5% | 67.3% |
| 9 | 23.4% | 41.0% |
| 13 | 12.3% | 27.6% |
| 18 | 5.5% | 16.8% |