IMvoke010
Atezolizumab versus placebo after multimodal definitive treatment in high-risk locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
Phase 3N = 406NCT03452137
- Population
- High-risk locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck without progression after multimodal definitive treatment
- Design
- Global, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial at 128 sites in 23 countries. 406 patients with locally advanced SCCHN (stage IVa or IVb of the oral cavity, larynx, hypopharynx or HPV-negative oropharynx, or stage III HPV-positive oropharynx; AJCC eighth edition) without progression after multimodal definitive treatment were randomised 1:1 to atezolizumab 1200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for 1 year or until recurrence, progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary end point was investigator-assessed event-free survival.
- Primary endpoint
- EFS
- Arms
- Atezolizumab (experimental, n = 203): Atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 1 year
- Placebo (control, n = 203): Placebo every 3 weeks for up to 1 year
- People
- Haddad R, senior author Wong DJ
EFSHR 0.94 (95% CI 0.70–1.26)Δ median EFS+6.8 monthsΔ 24-month OS+2.8 points
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Atezolizumab | Placebo | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFSRandomised patients (N = 406) | primarymedian follow-up 46.5 monthsHaddad 2025 | median 59.5 months | median 52.7 months | HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.70–1.26)P=0.68The 95% CIs for the medians (46.8 to not estimable; 41.4 to not estimable) have an upper bound that cannot be entered as a number. |
| OSRandomised patients (N = 406) | primaryHaddad 2025 | 82% at 2 y | 79.2% at 2 y | Overall survival was an additional end point; the abstract states there was no difference. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Atezolizumab | Placebo | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFSRandomised patients (N = 406) | primarymedian follow-up 46.5 monthsHaddad 2025 | median 59.5 months | median 52.7 months | HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.70–1.26)P=0.68The 95% CIs for the medians (46.8 to not estimable; 41.4 to not estimable) have an upper bound that cannot be entered as a number. |
| OSRandomised patients (N = 406) | primaryHaddad 2025 | 82% at 2 y | 79.2% at 2 y | Overall survival was an additional end point; the abstract states there was no difference. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| EFS | 0.94 | 0.7–1.26 |
- Atezolizumab (experimental)
- Placebo (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Atezolizumab | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 37 | 65.0% | 61.5% |
| 74 | 42.2% | 37.8% |
| 112 | 27.1% | 22.9% |
| 149 | 17.6% | 14.1% |