IMpower133
First-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide versus placebo plus carboplatin and etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer
Phase 3NCT02763579
- Population
- Patients with previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer
- Design
- Double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial; randomisation 1:1 to carboplatin and etoposide with atezolizumab or placebo for four 21-day cycles (induction), then atezolizumab or placebo maintenance until unacceptable toxic effects, RECIST 1.1 progression or no additional clinical benefit. Two primary endpoints: investigator-assessed PFS and OS in the ITT population. The registry lists 503 enrolled; the paper's abstract reports 201 and 202 randomised.
- Primary endpoint
- PFS, OS
- Arms
- Atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide (experimental, n = 201): Carboplatin and etoposide with atezolizumab for four 21-day cycles, then atezolizumab maintenance
- Placebo plus carboplatin-etoposide (control, n = 202): Carboplatin and etoposide with placebo for four 21-day cycles, then placebo maintenance
- People
- Horn L, IMpower133 Study Group
OSHR 0.70 (95% CI 0.54–0.91)Δ median OS+2 monthsPFSHR 0.77 (95% CI 0.62–0.96)Δ median PFS+0.9 months
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide | Placebo plus carboplatin-etoposide | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS | primarymedian follow-up 13.9 monthsHorn 2018 | median 12.3 months | median 10.3 months | HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.54–0.91)P=0.007Hazard ratio for death. The abstract does not label this analysis as interim or final. |
| PFSInvestigator-assessed | primarymedian follow-up 13.9 monthsHorn 2018 | median 5.2 months | median 4.3 months | HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.62–0.96)P=0.02Hazard ratio for disease progression or death; progression assessed by the investigators per the abstract. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide | Placebo plus carboplatin-etoposide | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS | primarymedian follow-up 13.9 monthsHorn 2018 | median 12.3 months | median 10.3 months | HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.54–0.91)P=0.007Hazard ratio for death. The abstract does not label this analysis as interim or final. |
| PFSInvestigator-assessed | primarymedian follow-up 13.9 monthsHorn 2018 | median 5.2 months | median 4.3 months | HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.62–0.96)P=0.02Hazard ratio for disease progression or death; progression assessed by the investigators per the abstract. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| OS | 0.7 | 0.54–0.91 |
| PFS | 0.77 | 0.62–0.96 |
- Atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide (experimental)
- Placebo plus carboplatin-etoposide (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide | Placebo plus carboplatin-etoposide |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 8 | 63.7% | 58.4% |
| 15 | 42.9% | 36.4% |
| 23 | 27.4% | 21.3% |
| 31 | 17.4% | 12.4% |
- Atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide (experimental)
- Placebo plus carboplatin-etoposide (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide | Placebo plus carboplatin-etoposide |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3 | 67.0% | 61.7% |
| 7 | 39.3% | 32.4% |
| 10 | 26.4% | 19.9% |
| 13 | 17.7% | 12.3% |