IMagyn050
Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, and Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Stage III or IV Ovarian Cancer: Placebo-Controlled Randomized Phase III Trial (IMagyn050/GOG 3015/ENGOT-OV39)
Phase 3N = 1,301NCT03038100
- Population
- Patients with newly diagnosed untreated FIGO stage III or IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer
- Design
- Multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised phase III trial. 1301 patients with newly diagnosed untreated FIGO stage III or IV ovarian cancer, after primary cytoreductive surgery with macroscopic residual disease or planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval surgery, were stratified by FIGO stage, ECOG performance status, tumour immune cell PD-L1 staining and treatment strategy and randomly assigned 1:1 to atezolizumab 1,200 mg or placebo (day 1, cycles 1-22) with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (cycles 1-6) plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (cycles 2-22; perioperative bevacizumab omitted in neoadjuvant patients). Co-primary end points investigator-assessed PFS and OS in the ITT and PD-L1-positive populations. PD-L1-positive: PD-L1-expressing tumour immune cells of 1% or more of tumour area (VENTANA SP142), 784 of 1301 patients (60%) per the full text (PMC8189598). Arm sizes from the full text: 651 atezolizumab, 650 placebo.
- Primary endpoint
- PFS, OS
- Arms
- Placebo plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab (control, n = 650): Placebo plus paclitaxel, carboplatin and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg
- Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab (experimental, n = 651): Atezolizumab 1,200 mg plus paclitaxel, carboplatin and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg
- People
- Moore KN, GOG 3015/ENGOT-OV39
PFSHR 0.92 (95% CI 0.79–1.07)Δ median PFS+1.1 monthsPFSHR 0.80 (95% CI 0.65–0.99)Δ median PFS+2.3 months
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab | Placebo plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | primaryMoore 2021 | median 19.5 months | median 18.4 months | HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.79–1.07)P=0.28Investigator-assessed PFS. |
| PFSPD-L1-positive population | primaryMoore 2021 | median 20.8 months | median 18.5 months | HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.65–0.99)P=0.038Investigator-assessed PFS in a co-primary population. The abstract states that the interim, immature overall survival results showed no significant benefit from atezolizumab (no figures given). |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab | Placebo plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | primaryMoore 2021 | median 19.5 months | median 18.4 months | HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.79–1.07)P=0.28Investigator-assessed PFS. |
| PFSPD-L1-positive population | primaryMoore 2021 | median 20.8 months | median 18.5 months | HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.65–0.99)P=0.038Investigator-assessed PFS in a co-primary population. The abstract states that the interim, immature overall survival results showed no significant benefit from atezolizumab (no figures given). |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| PFS | 0.92 | 0.79–1.07 |
| PFS | 0.8 | 0.65–0.99 |
- Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab (experimental)
- Placebo plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab | Placebo plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 12 | 65.3% | 63.6% |
| 24 | 42.6% | 40.5% |
| 37 | 26.8% | 24.8% |
| 49 | 17.5% | 15.8% |
- Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab (experimental)
- Placebo plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab | Placebo plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 13 | 64.8% | 61.4% |
| 26 | 42.0% | 37.8% |
| 39 | 27.3% | 23.2% |
| 52 | 17.7% | 14.3% |