Skip to content
Bending the Curve Trial by Trial
?

HYPO-RT-PC

Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial

Phase 3N = 1,200

Population
Men up to 75 years of age with intermediate-to-high-risk prostate cancer (89% intermediate risk, 11% high risk) and WHO performance status 0 to 2
Design
Open-label randomised non-inferiority phase 3 trial in 12 centres in Sweden and Denmark, July 2005 to November 2015: 1200 men up to 75 years of age with intermediate-to-high-risk prostate cancer were assigned to ultra-hypofractionation (42.7 Gy in seven fractions, 3 days per week for 2.5 weeks; 598) or conventional fractionation (78.0 Gy in 39 fractions, 5 days per week for 8 weeks; 602). No androgen deprivation therapy was allowed. Primary endpoint: time to biochemical or clinical failure, analysed in the per-protocol population (1180 patients); prespecified non-inferiority margin 4% at 5 years (critical hazard ratio 1.338). Registered as ISRCTN45905321.
Primary endpoint
BCF-free survival
Arms
  • 78 Gy in 39 fractions (control, n = 602): 78.0 Gy in 39 fractions, 5 days per week for 8 weeks
  • 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions (experimental, n = 598): 42.7 Gy in seven fractions, 3 days per week for 2.5 weeks
People
Widmark A, senior author Nilsson P
BCF-free survivalHR 1.002 (95% CI 0.758–1.325)Δ 60-month BCF-free survival0 pointsΔ RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicity+5 pointsΔ 12-month RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicity+4 pointsΔ 60-month RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicity0 pointsΔ 60-month RTOG grade 2 or worse gastrointestinal toxicity−3 points
Show the numbers
Results reported for HYPO-RT-PC
EndpointAnalysis42.7 Gy in 7 fractions78 Gy in 39 fractionsEffect
BCF-free survivalPer-protocol population (1180 of 1200 patients)Estimated failure-free survival at 5 years (primary endpoint: time to biochemical or clinical failure)primarymedian follow-up 5 yearsWidmark 201984% at 5 y (80–87%)84% at 5 y (80–87%)HR 1.002 (95% CI 0.758–1.325)P=0.99Adjusted hazard ratio; log-rank P value.
RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicityPatients assessed at end of radiotherapy (569 and 578)Acute physician-reported RTOG grade 2 or worse urinary toxicity at end of radiotherapyprimaryWidmark 201928%23%P=0.057158 of 569 vs 132 of 578; the abstract calls this weak evidence of an increase with ultra-hypofractionation. Patient-reported acute urinary and bowel symptoms were significantly higher with ultra-hypofractionation.
RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicityPatients assessed at 1 year (528 and 529)Physician-reported RTOG grade 2 or worse urinary toxicity at 1-year follow-upprimaryWidmark 20196% at 12 mo2% at 12 moP=0.003732 of 528 vs 13 of 529.
RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicityPatients assessed at 5 years (243 and 249)Physician-reported RTOG grade 2 or worse urinary toxicity at 5 yearsprimaryWidmark 20195% at 5 y5% at 5 yP=1.0011 of 243 vs 12 of 249.
RTOG grade 2 or worse gastrointestinal toxicityPatients assessed at 5 years (244 and 249)Physician-reported RTOG grade 2 or worse bowel toxicity at 5 yearsprimaryWidmark 20191% at 5 y4% at 5 yP=0.143 of 244 vs 9 of 249.
Results reported for HYPO-RT-PC
EndpointAnalysis42.7 Gy in 7 fractions78 Gy in 39 fractionsEffect
BCF-free survivalPer-protocol population (1180 of 1200 patients)Estimated failure-free survival at 5 years (primary endpoint: time to biochemical or clinical failure)primarymedian follow-up 5 yearsWidmark 201984% at 5 y (80–87%)84% at 5 y (80–87%)HR 1.002 (95% CI 0.758–1.325)P=0.99Adjusted hazard ratio; log-rank P value.
RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicityPatients assessed at end of radiotherapy (569 and 578)Acute physician-reported RTOG grade 2 or worse urinary toxicity at end of radiotherapyprimaryWidmark 201928%23%P=0.057158 of 569 vs 132 of 578; the abstract calls this weak evidence of an increase with ultra-hypofractionation. Patient-reported acute urinary and bowel symptoms were significantly higher with ultra-hypofractionation.
RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicityPatients assessed at 1 year (528 and 529)Physician-reported RTOG grade 2 or worse urinary toxicity at 1-year follow-upprimaryWidmark 20196% at 12 mo2% at 12 moP=0.003732 of 528 vs 13 of 529.
RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicityPatients assessed at 5 years (243 and 249)Physician-reported RTOG grade 2 or worse urinary toxicity at 5 yearsprimaryWidmark 20195% at 5 y5% at 5 yP=1.0011 of 243 vs 12 of 249.
RTOG grade 2 or worse gastrointestinal toxicityPatients assessed at 5 years (244 and 249)Physician-reported RTOG grade 2 or worse bowel toxicity at 5 yearsprimaryWidmark 20191% at 5 y4% at 5 yP=0.143 of 244 vs 9 of 249.
Hazard ratio (95% CI) by endpoint. Values below 1 favour the experimental arm.
BCF-free survival0.512◀ experimentalcontrol ▶
Data table
EndpointHR95% CI
BCF-free survival1.0020.758–1.325
Primary publication: Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, Thellenberg-Karlsson C, Hoyer M, Lagerlund M, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10196):385-395. PubMedDOI

Appears in

Sources

  1. Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, Thellenberg-Karlsson C, Hoyer M, Lagerlund M, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10196):385-395.

    PubMedDOI