Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer
N = 813
- Population
- Previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer
- Design
- Randomised trial in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients received irinotecan, bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFL) plus bevacizumab 5 mg per kilogram every two weeks, or IFL plus placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival.
- Primary endpoint
- OS
- Arms
- IFL plus placebo (control, n = 411): Irinotecan, bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin (IFL) plus placebo
- IFL plus bevacizumab (experimental, n = 402): IFL plus bevacizumab 5 mg per kilogram every two weeks
- People
- Hurwitz H
OSHR 0.66Δ median OS+4.7 monthsPFSHR 0.54Δ median PFS+4.4 monthsΔ ORR+10 pointsDORHR 0.62
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | IFL plus bevacizumab | IFL plus placebo | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSAll randomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract) | primaryHurwitz 2004 | median 20.3 months | median 15.6 months | HR 0.66P<0.001The abstract gives no confidence interval for the hazard ratio for death. |
| PFSAll randomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract) | primaryHurwitz 2004 | median 10.6 months | median 6.2 months | HR 0.54P<0.001Hazard ratio for disease progression; no confidence interval in the abstract. |
| ORRAll randomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract) | primaryHurwitz 2004 | 44.8% | 34.8% | P=0.004 |
| DORAll randomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract) | primaryHurwitz 2004 | median 10.4 months | median 7.1 months | HR 0.62P=0.001Hazard ratio for progression of responding patients; no confidence interval in the abstract. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | IFL plus bevacizumab | IFL plus placebo | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSAll randomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract) | primaryHurwitz 2004 | median 20.3 months | median 15.6 months | HR 0.66P<0.001The abstract gives no confidence interval for the hazard ratio for death. |
| PFSAll randomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract) | primaryHurwitz 2004 | median 10.6 months | median 6.2 months | HR 0.54P<0.001Hazard ratio for disease progression; no confidence interval in the abstract. |
| ORRAll randomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract) | primaryHurwitz 2004 | 44.8% | 34.8% | P=0.004 |
| DORAll randomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract) | primaryHurwitz 2004 | median 10.4 months | median 7.1 months | HR 0.62P=0.001Hazard ratio for progression of responding patients; no confidence interval in the abstract. |
- IFL plus placebo (control)
- IFL plus bevacizumab (experimental)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | IFL plus placebo | IFL plus bevacizumab |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 13 | 56.1% | 64.2% |
| 25 | 32.9% | 42.6% |
| 38 | 18.5% | 27.3% |
| 51 | 10.4% | 17.5% |
- IFL plus placebo (control)
- IFL plus bevacizumab (experimental)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | IFL plus placebo | IFL plus bevacizumab |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 7 | 45.7% | 63.3% |
| 13 | 23.4% | 42.7% |
| 20 | 10.7% | 27.0% |
| 27 | 4.9% | 17.1% |