Skip to content
Bending the Curve Trial by Trial
?

HOME

Randomized Trial of In-Home Cervical Cancer Screening in Underscreened Women

N = 19,851NCT02005510

Population
Women aged 30 to 64 years with health plan enrolment for 3 years and 5 months or more, a primary care clinician, no Papanicolaou test within 3 years and 5 months and no hysterectomy.
Design
Randomised clinical trial in Kaiser Permanente Washington, a US integrated health care delivery system. Women were enrolled from February 25, 2014 to August 29, 2016, with follow-up through February 26, 2018. The control group received usual care (annual patient reminders and ad hoc outreach from primary care clinics); the intervention group received usual care plus a mailed HPV self-sampling kit. Two primary outcomes were CIN2+ detection within 6 months of screening and treatment within 6 months of CIN2+ detection; screening uptake within 6 months of randomization was a secondary outcome.
Primary endpoint
CIN2+ detection within 6 months of screening, Treatment within 6 months of CIN2+ detection
Arms
  • Usual care plus mailed HPV self-sampling kit (experimental, n = 9,960): Usual care plus a mailed HPV self-sampling kit
  • Usual care reminders (control, n = 9,891): Annual patient reminders and ad hoc outreach from primary care clinics
People
Winer RL, senior author Buist DSM
Δ Screening uptake within 6 months of randomization+8.9 points
Show the numbers
Results reported for HOME
EndpointAnalysisUsual care plus mailed HPV self-sampling kitUsual care remindersEffect
Screening uptake within 6 months of randomizationAll randomised women (the abstract states that all women randomized were included in the analysis)Secondary outcome: proportion of randomised women who completed screening within 6 months of randomization.finalWiner 201926.3%17.4%2618 participants in the intervention group and 1719 in the control group; relative risk 1.51 (95% CI 1.43-1.60). CIN2+ detection (12 vs 8 women; relative risk 1.49, 95% CI 0.61-3.64) and treatment (12 vs 7; relative risk 1.70, 95% CI 0.67-4.32) did not differ significantly.
Results reported for HOME
EndpointAnalysisUsual care plus mailed HPV self-sampling kitUsual care remindersEffect
Screening uptake within 6 months of randomizationAll randomised women (the abstract states that all women randomized were included in the analysis)Secondary outcome: proportion of randomised women who completed screening within 6 months of randomization.finalWiner 201926.3%17.4%2618 participants in the intervention group and 1719 in the control group; relative risk 1.51 (95% CI 1.43-1.60). CIN2+ detection (12 vs 8 women; relative risk 1.49, 95% CI 0.61-3.64) and treatment (12 vs 7; relative risk 1.70, 95% CI 0.67-4.32) did not differ significantly.
Primary publication: Winer RL, Lin J, Tiro JA, Miglioretti DL, Beatty T, Gao H, et al. Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1914729. PubMedDOI

Appears in

Sources

  1. Winer RL, Lin J, Tiro JA, Miglioretti DL, Beatty T, Gao H, et al. Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1914729.

    PubMedDOI