FLAURA
Osimertinib versus gefitinib or erlotinib in previously untreated EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC (FLAURA)
Phase 3N = 556NCT02296125
- Population
- Previously untreated EGFR mutation-positive (exon 19 deletion or L858R) advanced NSCLC
- Design
- Double-blind phase 3 trial, 1:1 randomisation; primary endpoint investigator-assessed progression-free survival; overall survival a secondary endpoint (final analysis published separately)
- Primary endpoint
- PFS
- Arms
- Osimertinib (experimental, n = 279): Osimertinib 80 mg once daily
- Gefitinib or erlotinib (control, n = 277): Gefitinib 250 mg or erlotinib 150 mg once daily, analysed as one comparator group
- People
- Soria JC, FLAURA Investigators
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Osimertinib | Gefitinib or erlotinib | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSAll randomised patients (n=556)Investigator-assessed | primarySoria 2018 | median 18.9 months | median 10.2 months | HR 0.46 (95% CI 0.37–0.57)P<0.001 |
| ORRAll randomised patients (n=556) | primarySoria 2018 | 80% | 76% | P=0.24Odds ratio 1.27 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.90). |
| DORAll randomised patients (n=556) | primarySoria 2018 | median 17.2 months (13.8–22.0) | median 8.5 months (7.3–9.8) | — |
| OSAll randomised patients (n=556) | interimSoria 2018 | 83% at 18 mo (78–87%) | 71% at 18 mo (65–76%) | HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.45–0.88)P=0.007Overall survival data were immature (25% maturity); the abstract labels the P value nonsignificant in the interim analysis. |
| OSAll randomised patients (n=556) | finalRamalingam 2020 | median 38.6 months (34.5–41.8) | median 31.8 months (26.6–36.0) | HR 0.8P=0.046Hazard ratio for death 0.80 with a 95.05% confidence interval of 0.64 to 1.00 (as published; not a 95% interval). |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Osimertinib | Gefitinib or erlotinib | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSAll randomised patients (n=556)Investigator-assessed | primarySoria 2018 | median 18.9 months | median 10.2 months | HR 0.46 (95% CI 0.37–0.57)P<0.001 |
| ORRAll randomised patients (n=556) | primarySoria 2018 | 80% | 76% | P=0.24Odds ratio 1.27 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.90). |
| DORAll randomised patients (n=556) | primarySoria 2018 | median 17.2 months (13.8–22.0) | median 8.5 months (7.3–9.8) | — |
| OSAll randomised patients (n=556) | interimSoria 2018 | 83% at 18 mo (78–87%) | 71% at 18 mo (65–76%) | HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.45–0.88)P=0.007Overall survival data were immature (25% maturity); the abstract labels the P value nonsignificant in the interim analysis. |
| OSAll randomised patients (n=556) | finalRamalingam 2020 | median 38.6 months (34.5–41.8) | median 31.8 months (26.6–36.0) | HR 0.8P=0.046Hazard ratio for death 0.80 with a 95.05% confidence interval of 0.64 to 1.00 (as published; not a 95% interval). |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| PFS | 0.46 | 0.37–0.57 |
| OS | 0.63 | 0.45–0.88 |
- Osimertinib (experimental)
- Gefitinib or erlotinib (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Osimertinib | Gefitinib or erlotinib |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 12 | 64.4% | 44.2% |
| 24 | 41.5% | 19.6% |
| 35 | 27.7% | 9.3% |
| 47 | 17.8% | 4.1% |
- Osimertinib (experimental)
- Gefitinib or erlotinib (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Osimertinib | Gefitinib or erlotinib |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 11 | 64.2% | 40.8% |
| 22 | 41.2% | 16.6% |
| 32 | 27.5% | 7.4% |
| 43 | 17.7% | 3.0% |
Appears in
Sources
Soria JC, Ohe Y, Vansteenkiste J, Reungwetwattana T, Chewaskulyong B, Lee KH, et al. Osimertinib in Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):113-125.
Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D, Cho BC, Gray JE, Ohe Y, et al. Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(1):41-50.