FIRST
Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma
Phase 3N = 1,623NCT00689936
- Population
- Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation.
- Design
- Randomised trial in 1623 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma ineligible for stem-cell transplantation, assigned to lenalidomide and dexamethasone in 28-day cycles until disease progression (535 patients), to the same combination for 72 weeks (18 cycles; 541 patients), or to melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (MPT) for 72 weeks (547 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival with continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus MPT.
- Primary endpoint
- PFS
- Arms
- Lenalidomide-dexamethasone until progression (Rd continuous) (experimental, n = 535): Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in 28-day cycles until progression
- Lenalidomide-dexamethasone for 18 cycles (Rd18) (experimental, n = 541): Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone for 72 weeks (18 cycles)
- Melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) (control, n = 547): Melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide for 72 weeks
- People
- Benboubker L
PFSHR 0.72Δ median PFS+4.3 monthsΔ 48-month OS+8 pointsPFSHR 0.69 (95% CI 0.59–0.79)OSHR 0.78 (95% CI 0.67–0.92)Δ median OS+10 months
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Lenalidomide-dexamethasone until progression (Rd continuous) / Lenalidomide-dexamethasone for 18 cycles (Rd18) | Melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSRandomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract) | primaryBenboubker 2014 | median 25.5 months | median 21.2 months | HR 0.72P<0.001Hazard ratio 0.72 is continuous Rd versus MPT (primary comparison); continuous Rd versus Rd18 was 0.70 (P<0.001). |
| OSRandomised patients (interim analysis) | interimBenboubker 2014 | 59% at 4 y | 51% at 4 y | Grade 3 or 4 adverse events 70% with continuous Rd versus 78% with MPT. |
| PFSRandomised patients (final analysis) | finalmedian follow-up 67 monthsFacon 2018 | — | — | HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.59–0.79)P<0.00001Hazard ratio is continuous Rd versus MPT. |
| OSRandomised patients (final analysis) | finalmedian follow-up 67 monthsFacon 2018 | median 59.1 months | median 49.1 months | HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.67–0.92)P=0.0023Hazard ratio is continuous Rd versus MPT; the abstract describes median OS with Rd18 as similar (62.3 months). |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Lenalidomide-dexamethasone until progression (Rd continuous) / Lenalidomide-dexamethasone for 18 cycles (Rd18) | Melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSRandomised patients (analysis population not stated in the abstract) | primaryBenboubker 2014 | median 25.5 months | median 21.2 months | HR 0.72P<0.001Hazard ratio 0.72 is continuous Rd versus MPT (primary comparison); continuous Rd versus Rd18 was 0.70 (P<0.001). |
| OSRandomised patients (interim analysis) | interimBenboubker 2014 | 59% at 4 y | 51% at 4 y | Grade 3 or 4 adverse events 70% with continuous Rd versus 78% with MPT. |
| PFSRandomised patients (final analysis) | finalmedian follow-up 67 monthsFacon 2018 | — | — | HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.59–0.79)P<0.00001Hazard ratio is continuous Rd versus MPT. |
| OSRandomised patients (final analysis) | finalmedian follow-up 67 monthsFacon 2018 | median 59.1 months | median 49.1 months | HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.67–0.92)P=0.0023Hazard ratio is continuous Rd versus MPT; the abstract describes median OS with Rd18 as similar (62.3 months). |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| PFS | 0.69 | 0.59–0.79 |
| OS | 0.78 | 0.67–0.92 |
- Lenalidomide-dexamethasone until progression (Rd continuous) (experimental)
- Lenalidomide-dexamethasone for 18 cycles (Rd18) (experimental)
- Melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Lenalidomide-dexamethasone until progression (Rd continuous) | Lenalidomide-dexamethasone for 18 cycles (Rd18) | Melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 16 | 64.7% | 58.5% | 59.3% |
| 32 | 41.9% | 34.2% | 35.1% |
| 48 | 27.1% | 20.0% | 20.8% |
| 64 | 17.6% | 11.7% | 12.3% |
- Lenalidomide-dexamethasone until progression (Rd continuous) (experimental)
- Lenalidomide-dexamethasone for 18 cycles (Rd18) (experimental)
- Melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Lenalidomide-dexamethasone until progression (Rd continuous) | Lenalidomide-dexamethasone for 18 cycles (Rd18) | Melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide (MPT) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 39 | 63.3% | 64.8% | 57.7% |
| 78 | 40.1% | 42.0% | 33.2% |
| 117 | 25.4% | 27.2% | 19.2% |
| 156 | 16.0% | 17.6% | 11.1% |
Appears in
Sources
Benboubker L, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, Catalano J, Belch AR, Cavo M, et al. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(10):906-17.
Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A, Catalano JV, Belch A, Cavo M, et al. Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;131(3):301-310.