E2100
Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone as initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer
Phase 3N = 722NCT00028990
- Population
- Metastatic breast cancer, initial treatment
- Design
- Open-label randomised phase 3 trial: paclitaxel 90 mg per square metre on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks, alone or with bevacizumab 10 mg per kilogram on days 1 and 15. Enrolled December 2001 to May 2004.
- Primary endpoint
- PFS
- Arms
- Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (experimental): Paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg days 1 and 15, every 4 weeks
- Paclitaxel alone (control): Paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks
- People
- Miller K, senior author Davidson NE
PFSHR 0.6Δ median PFS+5.9 monthsΔ ORR+15.7 pointsOSHR 0.88Δ median OS+1.5 months
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab | Paclitaxel alone | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | primaryMiller 2007 | median 11.8 months | median 5.9 months | HR 0.6P<0.001Grade 3 or 4 hypertension 14.8% vs 0.0%, proteinuria 3.6% vs 0.0%, cerebrovascular ischemia 1.9% vs 0.0%; infection 9.3% vs 2.9%. |
| ORR | primaryMiller 2007 | 36.9% | 21.2% | P<0.001 |
| OS | primaryMiller 2007 | median 26.7 months | median 25.2 months | HR 0.88P=0.16Overall survival was a secondary endpoint. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab | Paclitaxel alone | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | primaryMiller 2007 | median 11.8 months | median 5.9 months | HR 0.6P<0.001Grade 3 or 4 hypertension 14.8% vs 0.0%, proteinuria 3.6% vs 0.0%, cerebrovascular ischemia 1.9% vs 0.0%; infection 9.3% vs 2.9%. |
| ORR | primaryMiller 2007 | 36.9% | 21.2% | P<0.001 |
| OS | primaryMiller 2007 | median 26.7 months | median 25.2 months | HR 0.88P=0.16Overall survival was a secondary endpoint. |
- Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (experimental)
- Paclitaxel alone (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab | Paclitaxel alone |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 7 | 66.3% | 43.9% |
| 15 | 41.4% | 17.2% |
| 22 | 27.5% | 7.5% |
| 30 | 17.2% | 2.9% |
- Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (experimental)
- Paclitaxel alone (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab | Paclitaxel alone |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 17 | 64.3% | 62.7% |
| 33 | 42.5% | 40.3% |
| 50 | 27.3% | 25.3% |
| 67 | 17.6% | 15.8% |