DUO
The phase 3 DUO trial: duvelisib versus ofatumumab in relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL
Phase 3N = 319NCT02004522
- Population
- Relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL
- Design
- Global phase 3 randomised study; patients randomised 1:1 to oral duvelisib 25 mg twice daily (n=160) or intravenous ofatumumab (n=159). The study met its primary endpoint of PFS per independent review committee.
- Primary endpoint
- PFS
- Arms
- Duvelisib (experimental, n = 160): Oral duvelisib 25 mg twice daily
- Ofatumumab (control, n = 159): Intravenous ofatumumab
- People
- Flinn IW
PFSHR 0.52Δ median PFS+3.4 monthsPFSHR 0.4Δ ORR+29 points
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Duvelisib | Ofatumumab | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSAll randomised patients; the abstract does not state the analysis population | primaryFlinn 2018 | median 13.3 months | median 9.9 months | HR 0.52P<.0001No confidence interval for the hazard ratio in the abstract. |
| PFSPatients with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation (subgroup) | primaryFlinn 2018 | — | — | HR 0.4P=0.0002Subgroup analysis; hazard ratio for PFS per independent review committee. |
| ORRAll randomised patients; the abstract does not state the analysis population | primaryFlinn 2018 | 74% | 45% | P<.0001Higher with duvelisib regardless of del(17p) status (abstract). |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Duvelisib | Ofatumumab | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSAll randomised patients; the abstract does not state the analysis population | primaryFlinn 2018 | median 13.3 months | median 9.9 months | HR 0.52P<.0001No confidence interval for the hazard ratio in the abstract. |
| PFSPatients with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation (subgroup) | primaryFlinn 2018 | — | — | HR 0.4P=0.0002Subgroup analysis; hazard ratio for PFS per independent review committee. |
| ORRAll randomised patients; the abstract does not state the analysis population | primaryFlinn 2018 | 74% | 45% | P<.0001Higher with duvelisib regardless of del(17p) status (abstract). |
- Duvelisib (experimental)
- Ofatumumab (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Duvelisib | Ofatumumab |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 8 | 65.9% | 57.1% |
| 17 | 41.2% | 30.4% |
| 25 | 27.2% | 17.4% |
| 33 | 17.9% | 9.9% |