DESTINY-Breast03
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study of DS-8201a (Trastuzumab Deruxtecan), an Anti-HER2 Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC), Versus Ado Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) for HER2-Positive, Unresectable and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer Subjects Previously Treated With Trastuzumab and Taxane
Phase 3N = 524NCT03529110
- Population
- HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane
- Design
- Multicentre open-label randomised phase 3 trial, 1:1 allocation to trastuzumab deruxtecan 5.4 mg/kg or trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks; stratified by hormone receptor status, prior pertuzumab and visceral disease. Primary endpoint: PFS by blinded independent central review.
- Primary endpoint
- PFS
- Arms
- Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) (control, n = 263): Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks
- Trastuzumab deruxtecan (experimental, n = 261): Trastuzumab deruxtecan 5.4 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks
- People
- Cortés J
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Trastuzumab deruxtecan | Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSAll randomised patients (524)PFS by blinded independent central review; the abstract gives 12-month landmark rates rather than medians | primaryCortés 2022 | 75.8% at 12 mo (69.8–80.7%) | 34.1% at 12 mo (27.7–40.5%) | HR 0.28 (95% CI 0.22–0.37)P<0.001 |
| OSAll randomised patients (524) | interimCortés 2022 | 94.1% at 12 mo (90.3–96.4%) | 85.9% at 12 mo (80.9–89.7%) | HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.36–0.86)The abstract states the prespecified significance boundary was not reached at this analysis. |
| ORRAll randomised patients (524) | primaryCortés 2022 | 79.7% (74.3–84.4%) | 34.2% (28.5–40.3%) | Overall response (complete or partial). |
| PFSFull analysis set (524 randomised)PFS by blinded independent central review | long term-updateHurvitz 2023 | median 28.8 months (22.4–37.9) | median 6.8 months (5.6–8.2) | HR 0.33 (95% CI 0.26–0.43)P<0.0001Updated analysis alongside the second interim overall survival analysis; nominal p value. Median follow-up 28.4 months with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 26.5 months with trastuzumab emtansine. |
| OSFull analysis set (524 randomised) | interimHurvitz 2023 | — | — | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.47–0.87)P=0.0037Second interim overall survival analysis. Median OS not reached in either group (95% CI 40.5 months to not estimable with trastuzumab deruxtecan; 34.0 months to not estimable with trastuzumab emtansine); 72 (28%) vs 97 (37%) overall survival events. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Trastuzumab deruxtecan | Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSAll randomised patients (524)PFS by blinded independent central review; the abstract gives 12-month landmark rates rather than medians | primaryCortés 2022 | 75.8% at 12 mo (69.8–80.7%) | 34.1% at 12 mo (27.7–40.5%) | HR 0.28 (95% CI 0.22–0.37)P<0.001 |
| OSAll randomised patients (524) | interimCortés 2022 | 94.1% at 12 mo (90.3–96.4%) | 85.9% at 12 mo (80.9–89.7%) | HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.36–0.86)The abstract states the prespecified significance boundary was not reached at this analysis. |
| ORRAll randomised patients (524) | primaryCortés 2022 | 79.7% (74.3–84.4%) | 34.2% (28.5–40.3%) | Overall response (complete or partial). |
| PFSFull analysis set (524 randomised)PFS by blinded independent central review | long term-updateHurvitz 2023 | median 28.8 months (22.4–37.9) | median 6.8 months (5.6–8.2) | HR 0.33 (95% CI 0.26–0.43)P<0.0001Updated analysis alongside the second interim overall survival analysis; nominal p value. Median follow-up 28.4 months with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 26.5 months with trastuzumab emtansine. |
| OSFull analysis set (524 randomised) | interimHurvitz 2023 | — | — | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.47–0.87)P=0.0037Second interim overall survival analysis. Median OS not reached in either group (95% CI 40.5 months to not estimable with trastuzumab deruxtecan; 34.0 months to not estimable with trastuzumab emtansine); 72 (28%) vs 97 (37%) overall survival events. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| PFS | 0.28 | 0.22–0.37 |
| OS | 0.55 | 0.36–0.86 |
| PFS | 0.33 | 0.26–0.43 |
| OS | 0.64 | 0.47–0.87 |
- Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) (control)
- Trastuzumab deruxtecan (experimental)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) | Trastuzumab deruxtecan |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 18 | 16.0% | 64.8% |
| 36 | 2.5% | 42.0% |
| 54 | 0.4% | 27.3% |
| 72 | 0.1% | 17.7% |
Appears in
Sources
Cortés J, Kim SB, Chung WP, Im SA, Park YH, Hegg R, et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan versus Trastuzumab Emtansine for Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(12):1143-1154.
Hurvitz SA, Hegg R, Chung WP, Im SA, Jacot W, Ganju V, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10371):105-117.