Skip to content
Bending the Curve Trial by Trial
?

CROSS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for resectable oesophageal or oesophagogastric-junction cancer (ChemoRadiotherapy for Oesophageal cancer followed by Surgery Study)

N = 366

Population
Clinically resectable oesophageal or oesophagogastric-junction cancer, clinical stage T1N1M0 or T2-3N0-1M0 (TNM sixth edition). Of 366 analysed: 75% adenocarcinoma, 23% squamous-cell carcinoma, 2% large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma
Design
Randomised controlled trial in eight Dutch centres (1:1, permuted blocks). Experimental arm: weekly carboplatin (AUC 2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) for 5 weeks with concurrent radiotherapy (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions), then surgery; control arm: surgery alone. 368 patients enrolled from March 2004 to December 2008; 366 analysed. Registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR487 (not an NCT number).
Primary endpoint
OS
Arms
  • Chemoradiotherapy then surgery (experimental, n = 178): Weekly carboplatin (AUC 2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) for 5 weeks with concurrent radiotherapy (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions), followed by surgery
  • Surgery alone (control, n = 188): Surgery alone
People
van Hagen P, CROSS Study Group
OSHR 0.657 (95% CI 0.495–0.871)Δ median OS+25.4 monthsΔ R0 resection+23 pointsOSHR 0.68 (95% CI 0.53–0.88)Δ median OS+24.6 monthsOSHR 0.48 (95% CI 0.28–0.83)
Show the numbers
Results reported for CROSS
EndpointAnalysisChemoradiotherapy then surgerySurgery aloneEffect
OS366 analysed patients (178 vs 188)primaryvan 2012median 49.4 monthsmedian 24 monthsHR 0.657 (95% CI 0.495–0.871)P=0.003Initial report. The abstract gives no median follow-up or confidence intervals for the medians; the long-term Lancet Oncology abstract states a median follow-up of 45 months for this first report.
R0 resectionPatients in each group, as reported in the abstract (denominators not stated there)primaryvan 201292%69%P<0.001R0 means complete resection with no tumour within 1 mm of the resection margins.
pCRPatients who underwent resection after chemoradiotherapy (47 of 161)primaryvan 201229%—The abstract reports no pathological response figure for the surgery-alone group. Postoperative complications were similar between groups and in-hospital mortality was 4% in both.
OSIntention-to-treat population, 366 analysed patients (178 vs 188)long term-updatemedian follow-up 84.1 monthsShapiro 2015median 48.6 months (32.1–65.1)median 24 months (14.2–33.7)HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.53–0.88)P=0.003Minimum follow-up 5 years; no adverse-event data were collected beyond the initial report.
OSSquamous-cell carcinoma subgrouplong term-updateShapiro 2015median 81.6 months (47.2–116.0)median 21.1 months (15.4–26.7)HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.28–0.83)P=0.008Subgroup analysis by histology.
OSAdenocarcinoma subgrouplong term-updateShapiro 2015median 43.2 months (24.9–61.4)median 27.1 months (13.0–41.2)HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.55–0.98)P=0.038Subgroup analysis by histology.
OS366 randomly assigned patientslong term-updatemedian follow-up 147 monthsEyck 202138% at 10 y25% at 10 yHR 0.70 (95% CI 0.55–0.89)The abstract states the effect on overall survival was not time-dependent (P for interaction 0.73). Death from oesophageal cancer: HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.80); death from other causes: HR 1.17 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.99). The 38% and 25% values are read as the chemoradiotherapy and surgery-alone arms respectively.
Results reported for CROSS
EndpointAnalysisChemoradiotherapy then surgerySurgery aloneEffect
OS366 analysed patients (178 vs 188)primaryvan 2012median 49.4 monthsmedian 24 monthsHR 0.657 (95% CI 0.495–0.871)P=0.003Initial report. The abstract gives no median follow-up or confidence intervals for the medians; the long-term Lancet Oncology abstract states a median follow-up of 45 months for this first report.
R0 resectionPatients in each group, as reported in the abstract (denominators not stated there)primaryvan 201292%69%P<0.001R0 means complete resection with no tumour within 1 mm of the resection margins.
pCRPatients who underwent resection after chemoradiotherapy (47 of 161)primaryvan 201229%—The abstract reports no pathological response figure for the surgery-alone group. Postoperative complications were similar between groups and in-hospital mortality was 4% in both.
OSIntention-to-treat population, 366 analysed patients (178 vs 188)long term-updatemedian follow-up 84.1 monthsShapiro 2015median 48.6 months (32.1–65.1)median 24 months (14.2–33.7)HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.53–0.88)P=0.003Minimum follow-up 5 years; no adverse-event data were collected beyond the initial report.
OSSquamous-cell carcinoma subgrouplong term-updateShapiro 2015median 81.6 months (47.2–116.0)median 21.1 months (15.4–26.7)HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.28–0.83)P=0.008Subgroup analysis by histology.
OSAdenocarcinoma subgrouplong term-updateShapiro 2015median 43.2 months (24.9–61.4)median 27.1 months (13.0–41.2)HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.55–0.98)P=0.038Subgroup analysis by histology.
OS366 randomly assigned patientslong term-updatemedian follow-up 147 monthsEyck 202138% at 10 y25% at 10 yHR 0.70 (95% CI 0.55–0.89)The abstract states the effect on overall survival was not time-dependent (P for interaction 0.73). Death from oesophageal cancer: HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.80); death from other causes: HR 1.17 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.99). The 38% and 25% values are read as the chemoradiotherapy and surgery-alone arms respectively.
Hazard ratio (95% CI) by endpoint. Values below 1 favour the experimental arm.
OSOSOSOSOS0.512◀ experimentalcontrol ▶
Data table
EndpointHR95% CI
OS0.6570.495–0.871
OS0.680.53–0.88
OS0.480.28–0.83
OS0.730.55–0.98
OS0.70.55–0.89
Illustrative — modelled from reported values, not trial data. OS, primary.
0%25%50%75%100%020406080100120Months (modelled)
  • Chemoradiotherapy then surgery (experimental)
  • Surgery alone (control)

Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.

Data table (modelled values)
MonthsChemoradiotherapy then surgerySurgery alone
0100.0%100.0%
3164.7%40.8%
6241.9%16.7%
9327.1%6.8%
12417.6%2.8%
Illustrative — modelled from reported values, not trial data. OS, long term-update.
0%25%50%75%100%020406080100120Months (modelled)
  • Chemoradiotherapy then surgery (experimental)
  • Surgery alone (control)

Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.

Data table (modelled values)
MonthsChemoradiotherapy then surgerySurgery alone
0100.0%100.0%
3065.2%42.0%
6141.9%17.2%
9127.3%7.2%
12217.6%2.9%
Primary publication: van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2074-84. PubMedDOI

Appears in

Sources

  1. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2074-84.

    PubMedDOI

  2. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090-1098.

    PubMedDOI

  3. Eyck BM, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, van der Wilk BJ, Shapiro J, van Hagen P, et al. Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(18):1995-2004.

    PubMedDOI