CLL7
Early treatment with FCR versus watch and wait in patients with stage Binet A high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Phase 3N = 800NCT00275054
- Population
- Untreated Binet stage A CLL with two or more of four risk features (randomised high-risk patients, n=201)
- Design
- Randomised prospective phase 3 study, conducted collaboratively by the German CLL Study Group and the French Cooperative Group on CLL. 800 patients with untreated Binet stage A CLL were enrolled as the intention-to-treat population and assessed for four prognostic markers (lymphocyte doubling time under 12 months, serum thymidine kinase above 10 U/L, unmutated IGHV, unfavourable cytogenetics). The 201 patients with two or more risk features (high risk) were randomised 1:1 to immediate 6xFCR or observation. Primary endpoint event-free survival, with progression, treatment or death counted as events (full text). The ClinicalTrials.gov record lists 825 enrolled.
- Primary endpoint
- EFS
- Arms
- Early FCR (Hi-FCR) (experimental, n = 100): Six cycles of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab
- Watch and wait (Hi-W&W) (control, n = 101): Observation according to standard of care
- People
- Herling CD, German CLL Study Group and French Cooperative Group on CLL
EFSHR 0.22 (95% CI 0.15–0.33)Δ 60-month OS+3 points
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Early FCR (Hi-FCR) | Watch and wait (Hi-W&W) | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFSHigh-risk randomised patients (n=201) | primarymedian follow-up 55.6 monthsHerling 2020 | — | median 18.5 months | HR 0.22 (95% CI 0.15–0.33)P<0.001Primary endpoint. Events were progression, treatment or death. Median EFS not reached in the early-FCR arm; 36 of 100 (36.0%) early-FCR and 83 of 101 (82.2%) observation patients had an event. Hazard ratio is for early FCR vs observation (stratified and non-stratified log-rank P<0.001). Median observation time 55.6 months (range 0-99.2). Overall response rate after early FCR 92.7%. |
| OSHigh-risk randomised patients (n=201) | primarymedian follow-up 55.6 monthsHerling 2020 | 82.9% at 5 y | 79.9% at 5 y | P=0.8645-year overall survival; no significant overall survival benefit. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Early FCR (Hi-FCR) | Watch and wait (Hi-W&W) | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFSHigh-risk randomised patients (n=201) | primarymedian follow-up 55.6 monthsHerling 2020 | — | median 18.5 months | HR 0.22 (95% CI 0.15–0.33)P<0.001Primary endpoint. Events were progression, treatment or death. Median EFS not reached in the early-FCR arm; 36 of 100 (36.0%) early-FCR and 83 of 101 (82.2%) observation patients had an event. Hazard ratio is for early FCR vs observation (stratified and non-stratified log-rank P<0.001). Median observation time 55.6 months (range 0-99.2). Overall response rate after early FCR 92.7%. |
| OSHigh-risk randomised patients (n=201) | primarymedian follow-up 55.6 monthsHerling 2020 | 82.9% at 5 y | 79.9% at 5 y | P=0.8645-year overall survival; no significant overall survival benefit. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| EFS | 0.22 | 0.15–0.33 |
- Watch and wait (Hi-W&W) (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Watch and wait (Hi-W&W) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% |
| 12 | 63.8% |
| 23 | 42.2% |
| 35 | 26.9% |
| 46 | 17.8% |