Skip to content
Bending the Curve Trial by Trial
?

CAP

Cluster Randomized Trial of PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer

N = 415,357

Population
Men aged 50-69 years registered at 573 primary care practices (415,357 randomised men; 98% included in the analyses).
Design
Cluster-randomised trial: 573 primary care practices in the United Kingdom (England and Wales per the 2024 report) were randomised (2001 to 2007 per the 2024 report) and men aged 50-69 years were enrolled (2002 to 2009). Men at intervention practices received an invitation to attend a PSA testing clinic for a single PSA test, with a standardised diagnostic pathway (further tests if PSA was 3.0 ng/mL or higher); control practices provided standard unscreened practice (no invitation).
Primary endpoint
Prostate cancer mortality
Arms
  • Single PSA invitation (experimental, n = 195,912): Invitation to a PSA testing clinic and a single PSA test; diagnostic tests if PSA 3.0 ng/mL or higher
  • Standard practice (control, n = 219,445): Standard practice without invitation to screening
People
Martin RM, CAP Trial Group
Δ Cumulative incidence of prostate cancer+0.7 pointsΔ Detection of low-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or lower)+0.6 pointsΔ Prostate cancer mortality−0.09 pointsΔ All-cause mortality−0.1 pointsΔ Cumulative incidence of prostate cancer+0.14 pointsΔ Detection of low-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or lower)+0.6 points
Show the numbers
Results reported for CAP
EndpointAnalysisSingle PSA invitationStandard practiceEffect
Cumulative incidence of prostate cancerMen included in the analysis (189,386 intervention; 219,439 control)Proportion of men diagnosed with prostate cancer by a median follow-up of 10 years (numbers diagnosed as a share of the men analysed, as printed in the 2018 abstract).primarymedian follow-up 10 yearsMartin 20184.3%3.6%P<.0018054 vs 7853 men diagnosed; rate ratio 1.19 (95% CI 1.14-1.25). Primary outcome in the same report, prostate-cancer mortality at a median of 10 years: 549 vs 647 deaths (0.30 vs 0.31 per 1000 person-years), rate ratio 0.96 (95% CI 0.85-1.08; P=.50). 40% of the intervention group attended the clinic.
Detection of low-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or lower)Men included in the analysis (189,386 intervention; 219,439 control)Proportion of men with a prostate cancer of Gleason grade 6 or lower identified, by a median follow-up of 10 years.primarymedian follow-up 10 yearsMartin 20181.7%1.1%P<.0013263 of 189,386 vs 2440 of 219,439; difference per 1000 men 6.11 (95% CI 5.38-6.84). Prespecified secondary outcome.
Prostate cancer mortalityMen included in the analyses (98% of 415,357 eligible men)Kaplan-Meier cumulative risk of death from prostate cancer at a median follow-up of 15 years (the 2024 full text states that these are cumulative risks).long term-updatemedian follow-up 15 yearsMartin 20240.69% (0.65–0.73%)0.78% (0.73–0.82%)P=.031199 deaths from prostate cancer in the intervention group and 1451 in the control group; rate ratio 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.99; P=.03 is for the rate ratio); risk difference -0.09% (95% CI -0.15 to -0.03; P=.02, full text). A secondary analysis (the primary outcome at a median of 10 years was reported in 2018); the abstract states the absolute reduction in deaths was small. Eight of the prostate-cancer deaths in the intervention group (0.7%) and 7 in the control group (0.5%) were related to a diagnostic biopsy or prostate cancer treatment.
All-cause mortalityMen included in the analyses (98% of 415,357 eligible men)Kaplan-Meier cumulative risk of death from any cause at a median follow-up of 15 years.long term-updatemedian follow-up 15 yearsMartin 202423.2% (23.0–23.4%)23.3% (23.1–23.5%)P=.1145,084 vs 50,336 deaths; rate ratio 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-1.01).
Cumulative incidence of prostate cancerMen included in the analyses (98% of 415,357 eligible men)15-year cumulative risk of a prostate cancer diagnosis.long term-updatemedian follow-up 15 yearsMartin 20247.08% (6.95–7.21%)6.94% (6.82–7.06%)12,013 men with a prostate cancer diagnosis in the intervention group and 12,958 in the control group.
Detection of low-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or lower)Men included in the analyses (98% of 415,357 eligible men)Proportion of men diagnosed with Gleason score 6 or lower prostate cancer, by a median of 15 years.long term-updatemedian follow-up 15 yearsMartin 20242.2%1.6%P<.001Intermediate (Gleason score 7), high-grade (Gleason score 8 or higher), locally advanced (T3) and distally advanced (T4/N1/M1) tumours were not detected more often in the intervention group (as stated in the abstract).
Results reported for CAP
EndpointAnalysisSingle PSA invitationStandard practiceEffect
Cumulative incidence of prostate cancerMen included in the analysis (189,386 intervention; 219,439 control)Proportion of men diagnosed with prostate cancer by a median follow-up of 10 years (numbers diagnosed as a share of the men analysed, as printed in the 2018 abstract).primarymedian follow-up 10 yearsMartin 20184.3%3.6%P<.0018054 vs 7853 men diagnosed; rate ratio 1.19 (95% CI 1.14-1.25). Primary outcome in the same report, prostate-cancer mortality at a median of 10 years: 549 vs 647 deaths (0.30 vs 0.31 per 1000 person-years), rate ratio 0.96 (95% CI 0.85-1.08; P=.50). 40% of the intervention group attended the clinic.
Detection of low-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or lower)Men included in the analysis (189,386 intervention; 219,439 control)Proportion of men with a prostate cancer of Gleason grade 6 or lower identified, by a median follow-up of 10 years.primarymedian follow-up 10 yearsMartin 20181.7%1.1%P<.0013263 of 189,386 vs 2440 of 219,439; difference per 1000 men 6.11 (95% CI 5.38-6.84). Prespecified secondary outcome.
Prostate cancer mortalityMen included in the analyses (98% of 415,357 eligible men)Kaplan-Meier cumulative risk of death from prostate cancer at a median follow-up of 15 years (the 2024 full text states that these are cumulative risks).long term-updatemedian follow-up 15 yearsMartin 20240.69% (0.65–0.73%)0.78% (0.73–0.82%)P=.031199 deaths from prostate cancer in the intervention group and 1451 in the control group; rate ratio 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.99; P=.03 is for the rate ratio); risk difference -0.09% (95% CI -0.15 to -0.03; P=.02, full text). A secondary analysis (the primary outcome at a median of 10 years was reported in 2018); the abstract states the absolute reduction in deaths was small. Eight of the prostate-cancer deaths in the intervention group (0.7%) and 7 in the control group (0.5%) were related to a diagnostic biopsy or prostate cancer treatment.
All-cause mortalityMen included in the analyses (98% of 415,357 eligible men)Kaplan-Meier cumulative risk of death from any cause at a median follow-up of 15 years.long term-updatemedian follow-up 15 yearsMartin 202423.2% (23.0–23.4%)23.3% (23.1–23.5%)P=.1145,084 vs 50,336 deaths; rate ratio 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-1.01).
Cumulative incidence of prostate cancerMen included in the analyses (98% of 415,357 eligible men)15-year cumulative risk of a prostate cancer diagnosis.long term-updatemedian follow-up 15 yearsMartin 20247.08% (6.95–7.21%)6.94% (6.82–7.06%)12,013 men with a prostate cancer diagnosis in the intervention group and 12,958 in the control group.
Detection of low-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score 6 or lower)Men included in the analyses (98% of 415,357 eligible men)Proportion of men diagnosed with Gleason score 6 or lower prostate cancer, by a median of 15 years.long term-updatemedian follow-up 15 yearsMartin 20242.2%1.6%P<.001Intermediate (Gleason score 7), high-grade (Gleason score 8 or higher), locally advanced (T3) and distally advanced (T4/N1/M1) tumours were not detected more often in the intervention group (as stated in the abstract).
Primary publication: Martin RM, Donovan JL, Turner EL, Metcalfe C, Young GJ, Walsh EI, et al. Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319(9):883-895. PubMedDOI

Appears in

Sources

  1. Martin RM, Donovan JL, Turner EL, Metcalfe C, Young GJ, Walsh EI, et al. Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319(9):883-895.

    PubMedDOI

  2. Martin RM, Turner EL, Young GJ, Metcalfe C, Walsh EI, Lane JA, et al. Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and 15-Year Prostate Cancer Mortality: A Secondary Analysis of the CAP Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024;331(17):1460-1470.

    PubMedDOI