Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (Cancer and Leukemia Group B)
Phase 3N = 1,088
- Population
- Adults with newly diagnosed AML (1088 treated; 596 in complete remission randomised to postremission cytarabine).
- Design
- Adults with newly diagnosed AML received daunorubicin for 3 days and cytarabine for 7 days. Of 693 patients who achieved complete remission, 596 were randomly assigned to four courses of cytarabine at 100 mg/m2 per day for 5 days by continuous infusion, 400 mg/m2 per day for 5 days by continuous infusion, or 3 g/m2 in a 3-hour infusion every 12 hours on days 1, 3 and 5; all then received four monthly maintenance courses. Median follow-up 52 months. The 1994 abstract prints no study number; the label CALGB 8525 in the trial id comes from a later CALGB report with the same three-dose randomisation and is an unconfirmed inference.
- Arms
- Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 (control): Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day for 5 days by continuous infusion, four courses
- Cytarabine 400 mg/m2 (experimental): Cytarabine 400 mg/m2 per day for 5 days by continuous infusion, four courses
- Cytarabine 3 g/m2 (experimental): Cytarabine 3 g/m2 in a 3-hour infusion every 12 hours on days 1, 3 and 5, four courses
- People
- Mayer RJ, Cancer and Leukemia Group B
DFSHR 0.67 (95% CI 0.53–0.86)DFSHR 0.75 (95% CI 0.60–0.94)Δ 48-month Continuous complete remission+5 points
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Cytarabine 400 mg/m2 / Cytarabine 3 g/m2 | Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFSPatients in complete remission randomised to postremission cytarabine (596) | primarymedian follow-up 52 monthsMayer 1994 | — | — | HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.53–0.86)P=0.003Hazard ratio for 3 g/m2 versus 100 mg/m2. The P value is for the difference among the three dose groups, as published. |
| DFSPatients in complete remission randomised to postremission cytarabine (596) | primarymedian follow-up 52 monthsMayer 1994 | — | — | HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.60–0.94)P=0.003Hazard ratio for 400 mg/m2 versus 100 mg/m2. The P value is for the difference among the three dose groups, as published. |
| Continuous complete remissionPatients aged 60 years or younger | primaryMayer 1994 | 29% at 4 y | 24% at 4 y | P=0.002For patients older than 60 the abstract gives the probability of remaining disease-free at four years as 16 percent or less in each of the three groups. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Cytarabine 400 mg/m2 / Cytarabine 3 g/m2 | Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFSPatients in complete remission randomised to postremission cytarabine (596) | primarymedian follow-up 52 monthsMayer 1994 | — | — | HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.53–0.86)P=0.003Hazard ratio for 3 g/m2 versus 100 mg/m2. The P value is for the difference among the three dose groups, as published. |
| DFSPatients in complete remission randomised to postremission cytarabine (596) | primarymedian follow-up 52 monthsMayer 1994 | — | — | HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.60–0.94)P=0.003Hazard ratio for 400 mg/m2 versus 100 mg/m2. The P value is for the difference among the three dose groups, as published. |
| Continuous complete remissionPatients aged 60 years or younger | primaryMayer 1994 | 29% at 4 y | 24% at 4 y | P=0.002For patients older than 60 the abstract gives the probability of remaining disease-free at four years as 16 percent or less in each of the three groups. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| DFS | 0.67 | 0.53–0.86 |
| DFS | 0.75 | 0.6–0.94 |