Skip to content
Bending the Curve Trial by Trial
?

BLUE-C

Clinical Validation of An Optimized Multi-Target Stool DNA (Mt-sDNA 2.0) Test, for Colorectal Cancer Screening (BLUE-C)

Phase observationalN = 20,176NCT04144738

Population
Asymptomatic adults aged 40 years or older undergoing screening colonoscopy (20,176 participants). Funded by Exact Sciences.
Design
Prospective study of a next-generation multitarget stool DNA test (DNA molecular markers plus hemoglobin) in asymptomatic adults aged 40 years or older undergoing screening colonoscopy, with a commercially available FIT as comparator. Primary outcomes: sensitivity for colorectal cancer and specificity for advanced neoplasia. Secondary: sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions, specificity for nonneoplastic findings or negative colonoscopy, and comparison with FIT. Of 20,176 participants, 98 had colorectal cancer, 2,144 advanced precancerous lesions, 6,973 nonadvanced adenomas and 10,961 nonneoplastic findings or a negative colonoscopy. The FDA summary describes a prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter pivotal study of 26,758 participants at 186 US sites.
Primary endpoint
Sensitivity for colorectal cancer, Specificity for advanced neoplasia
Arms
  • Next-generation multitarget stool DNA test (experimental, n = 20,176): Stool DNA markers plus hemoglobin (Cologuard Plus)
  • FIT (control, n = 20,176): Commercially available fecal immunochemical test
People
Imperiale TF
Δ Sensitivity for colorectal cancer+26.6 pointsΔ Sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions+20.1 pointsΔ Specificity for advanced neoplasia−4.2 pointsΔ Specificity for nonneoplastic findings or negative colonoscopy−3 points
Show the numbers
Results reported for BLUE-C
EndpointAnalysisNext-generation multitarget stool DNA testFITEffect
Sensitivity for colorectal cancerParticipants with colorectal cancer (98 of 20,176)Proportion of participants with colorectal cancer on colonoscopy whose test was positiveprimaryImperiale 202493.9% (87.1–97.7%)67.3% (57.1–76.5%)P<0.001Paired comparison in the same participants. The FDA summary, whose primary population excludes participants under 45 and those with a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer, reports 95.3% (95% CI 88.4 to 98.7).
Sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesionsParticipants with advanced precancerous lesions (2,144 of 20,176)Proportion of participants with an advanced precancerous lesion on colonoscopy whose test was positiveprimaryImperiale 202443.4% (41.3–45.6%)23.3% (21.5–25.2%)P<0.001Secondary outcome.
Specificity for advanced neoplasiaParticipants without advanced neoplasiaProportion of participants without colorectal cancer or advanced precancerous lesions on colonoscopy whose test was negativeprimaryImperiale 202490.6% (90.1–91.0%)94.8% (94.4–95.1%)P<0.001Lower for the stool DNA test than for FIT: more false-positive results.
Specificity for nonneoplastic findings or negative colonoscopyParticipants with nonneoplastic findings or a negative colonoscopy (10,961)Proportion of participants with nonneoplastic findings or a negative colonoscopy whose test was negativeprimaryImperiale 202492.7% (92.2–93.1%)95.7% (95.3–96.1%)Secondary outcome; the abstract gives no P value for this comparison.
Results reported for BLUE-C
EndpointAnalysisNext-generation multitarget stool DNA testFITEffect
Sensitivity for colorectal cancerParticipants with colorectal cancer (98 of 20,176)Proportion of participants with colorectal cancer on colonoscopy whose test was positiveprimaryImperiale 202493.9% (87.1–97.7%)67.3% (57.1–76.5%)P<0.001Paired comparison in the same participants. The FDA summary, whose primary population excludes participants under 45 and those with a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer, reports 95.3% (95% CI 88.4 to 98.7).
Sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesionsParticipants with advanced precancerous lesions (2,144 of 20,176)Proportion of participants with an advanced precancerous lesion on colonoscopy whose test was positiveprimaryImperiale 202443.4% (41.3–45.6%)23.3% (21.5–25.2%)P<0.001Secondary outcome.
Specificity for advanced neoplasiaParticipants without advanced neoplasiaProportion of participants without colorectal cancer or advanced precancerous lesions on colonoscopy whose test was negativeprimaryImperiale 202490.6% (90.1–91.0%)94.8% (94.4–95.1%)P<0.001Lower for the stool DNA test than for FIT: more false-positive results.
Specificity for nonneoplastic findings or negative colonoscopyParticipants with nonneoplastic findings or a negative colonoscopy (10,961)Proportion of participants with nonneoplastic findings or a negative colonoscopy whose test was negativeprimaryImperiale 202492.7% (92.2–93.1%)95.7% (95.3–96.1%)Secondary outcome; the abstract gives no P value for this comparison.
Primary publication: Imperiale TF, Porter K, Zella J, Gagrat ZD, Olson MC, Statz S, et al. Next-Generation Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(11):984-993. PubMedDOI

Appears in

Sources

  1. Imperiale TF, Porter K, Zella J, Gagrat ZD, Olson MC, Statz S, et al. Next-Generation Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(11):984-993.

    PubMedDOI