ASCEND
ASCEND: phase III, randomized trial of acalabrutinib versus idelalisib plus rituximab or bendamustine plus rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Phase 3N = 310NCT02970318
- Population
- Relapsed or refractory CLL, age 18 or older; median of two prior therapies (range 1-10)
- Design
- Global, multicentre, open-label phase 3 study; patients aged 18 or older with relapsed or refractory CLL randomly assigned 1:1, stratified by del(17p), ECOG performance status and number of prior therapies, to acalabrutinib monotherapy or investigator's choice of idelalisib-rituximab or bendamustine-rituximab. Primary endpoint PFS by independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population.
- Primary endpoint
- PFS
- Arms
- Acalabrutinib (experimental, n = 155): Acalabrutinib monotherapy
- Investigator's choice (control, n = 155): Idelalisib plus rituximab (n=119) or bendamustine plus rituximab (n=36)
- People
- Ghia P, senior author Jurczak W
PFSHR 0.31 (95% CI 0.20–0.49)Δ 12-month PFS+20 points
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Acalabrutinib | Investigator's choice | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | primarymedian follow-up 16.1 monthsGhia 2020 | 88% at 12 mo (81–92%) | median 16.5 months (14.0–17.1); 68% at 12 mo (59–75%) | HR 0.31 (95% CI 0.20–0.49)P<.0001Median PFS not reached with acalabrutinib. Estimated PFS at 12 months. PFS assessed by independent review committee. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Acalabrutinib | Investigator's choice | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | primarymedian follow-up 16.1 monthsGhia 2020 | 88% at 12 mo (81–92%) | median 16.5 months (14.0–17.1); 68% at 12 mo (59–75%) | HR 0.31 (95% CI 0.20–0.49)P<.0001Median PFS not reached with acalabrutinib. Estimated PFS at 12 months. PFS assessed by independent review committee. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| PFS | 0.31 | 0.2–0.49 |
- Investigator's choice (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Investigator's choice |
|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% |
| 10 | 65.7% |
| 21 | 41.4% |
| 31 | 27.2% |
| 41 | 17.9% |