ADMIRAL
Gilteritinib or chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML
Phase 3N = 371NCT02421939
- Population
- Adults with relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML
- Design
- Phase 3 trial randomizing adults 2:1 to gilteritinib 120 mg per day or salvage chemotherapy. Two primary end points: overall survival and the percentage of patients with complete remission with full or partial hematologic recovery. Secondary end points included event-free survival and the percentage with complete remission.
- Primary endpoint
- OS, CR+CRh
- Arms
- Gilteritinib (experimental, n = 247): Gilteritinib 120 mg orally per day
- Salvage chemotherapy (control, n = 124): Salvage chemotherapy (regimens not specified in the abstract)
- People
- Perl AE
OSHR 0.64 (95% CI 0.49–0.83)Δ median OS+3.7 monthsΔ CR+CRh+18.7 pointsΔ CR+10.6 pointsEFSHR 0.79 (95% CI 0.58–1.09)Δ median EFS+2.1 months
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Gilteritinib | Salvage chemotherapy | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSRandomized patients (371 eligible); the abstract does not use the term ITT | primaryPerl 2019 | median 9.3 months | median 5.6 months | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.49–0.83)P<0.001 |
| CR+CRhRandomized patients (371 eligible); the abstract does not use the term ITTComplete remission with full or partial hematologic recovery | primaryPerl 2019 | 34% | 15.3% | Risk difference 18.6 percentage points (95% CI 9.8 to 27.4). |
| CRRandomized patients (371 eligible); the abstract does not use the term ITT | primaryPerl 2019 | 21.1% | 10.5% | Risk difference 10.6 percentage points (95% CI 2.8 to 18.4). |
| EFSRandomized patients (371 eligible); the abstract does not use the term ITT | primaryPerl 2019 | median 2.8 months | median 0.7 months | HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.58–1.09)Secondary end point; the abstract gives no P value, and the confidence interval for the hazard ratio includes 1.0. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Gilteritinib | Salvage chemotherapy | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSRandomized patients (371 eligible); the abstract does not use the term ITT | primaryPerl 2019 | median 9.3 months | median 5.6 months | HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.49–0.83)P<0.001 |
| CR+CRhRandomized patients (371 eligible); the abstract does not use the term ITTComplete remission with full or partial hematologic recovery | primaryPerl 2019 | 34% | 15.3% | Risk difference 18.6 percentage points (95% CI 9.8 to 27.4). |
| CRRandomized patients (371 eligible); the abstract does not use the term ITT | primaryPerl 2019 | 21.1% | 10.5% | Risk difference 10.6 percentage points (95% CI 2.8 to 18.4). |
| EFSRandomized patients (371 eligible); the abstract does not use the term ITT | primaryPerl 2019 | median 2.8 months | median 0.7 months | HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.58–1.09)Secondary end point; the abstract gives no P value, and the confidence interval for the hazard ratio includes 1.0. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| OS | 0.64 | 0.49–0.83 |
| EFS | 0.79 | 0.58–1.09 |
- Gilteritinib (experimental)
- Salvage chemotherapy (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Gilteritinib | Salvage chemotherapy |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 6 | 63.9% | 47.6% |
| 12 | 40.9% | 22.6% |
| 17 | 28.2% | 12.2% |
| 23 | 18.0% | 5.8% |
- Gilteritinib (experimental)
- Salvage chemotherapy (control)
Median-only curves assume a constant hazard (exponential) and fit plateaus, as seen with some immunotherapies, poorly.
Data table (modelled values)
| Months | Gilteritinib | Salvage chemotherapy |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2 | 61.0% | 13.8% |
| 4 | 37.1% | 1.9% |
| 5 | 29.0% | 0.7% |
| 7 | 17.7% | 0.1% |