Postoperative radiotherapy after complete resection of Masaoka or Masaoka-Koga stage II or III thymoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Phase meta-analysisN = 4,746
- Population
- 4,746 patients in five studies of completely resected Masaoka or Masaoka-Koga stage II or III thymoma
- Design
- Systematic review of four online databases and random-effects (generic inverse variance) meta-analysis of five studies that compared surgery alone with surgery plus PORT after complete resection of Masaoka or Masaoka-Koga stage II or III thymoma, using multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios. OS was the primary and disease-free survival (DFS) the secondary end point. The authors describe the evidence as observational. 2,408 of the 4,746 patients received PORT.
- Primary endpoint
- OS
- Arms
- Surgery alone (control): Complete resection without postoperative radiotherapy
- Surgery plus PORT (experimental, n = 2,408): Complete resection followed by postoperative radiotherapy
- People
- Tateishi Y, senior author Kaneko T
OSHR 0.68 (95% CI 0.57–0.83)OSHR 0.63 (95% CI 0.44–0.91)OSHR 0.72 (95% CI 0.55–0.95)DFSHR 0.96 (95% CI 0.70–1.33)
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Surgery plus PORT | Surgery alone | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSFive observational studies, stage II and III combined (multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios) | finalTateishi 2021 | — | — | HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.57–0.83)P<0.001Random-effects pooled estimate of adjusted hazard ratios from observational studies; I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.97. |
| OSMasaoka or Masaoka-Koga stage II subgroup | finalTateishi 2021 | — | — | HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.44–0.91)P=0.01Subgroup of the same meta-analysis; I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.80. |
| OSMasaoka or Masaoka-Koga stage III subgroup | finalTateishi 2021 | — | — | HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.55–0.95)P=0.02Subgroup of the same meta-analysis; I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.84. |
| DFSFive observational studies, stage II and III combined | finalTateishi 2021 | — | — | HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.70–1.33)P=0.83Secondary end point. The abstract states PORT was not associated with improved DFS; I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.72. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Surgery plus PORT | Surgery alone | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSFive observational studies, stage II and III combined (multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios) | finalTateishi 2021 | — | — | HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.57–0.83)P<0.001Random-effects pooled estimate of adjusted hazard ratios from observational studies; I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.97. |
| OSMasaoka or Masaoka-Koga stage II subgroup | finalTateishi 2021 | — | — | HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.44–0.91)P=0.01Subgroup of the same meta-analysis; I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.80. |
| OSMasaoka or Masaoka-Koga stage III subgroup | finalTateishi 2021 | — | — | HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.55–0.95)P=0.02Subgroup of the same meta-analysis; I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.84. |
| DFSFive observational studies, stage II and III combined | finalTateishi 2021 | — | — | HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.70–1.33)P=0.83Secondary end point. The abstract states PORT was not associated with improved DFS; I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.72. |
Data table
| Endpoint | HR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| OS | 0.68 | 0.57–0.83 |
| OS | 0.63 | 0.44–0.91 |
| OS | 0.72 | 0.55–0.95 |
| DFS | 0.96 | 0.7–1.33 |