Determinants of complete resection of thymoma by minimally invasive and open thymectomy: analysis of an international registry
Phase observationalN = 2,514
- Population
- 2,514 patients who underwent thymectomy for thymoma, 1997-2012
- Design
- Retrospective analysis of the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) database: 2,514 patients who underwent thymectomy for thymoma between 1997 and 2012, 2,053 (82%) by open thymectomy and 461 (18%) by minimally invasive thymectomy. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, multivariate logistic regression and propensity matching (266 patients in each matched group). Not randomised. On multivariate analysis, surgical approach was not associated with completeness of resection; factors associated with R0 resection were geographical region, later time period, less advanced Masaoka stage, total thymectomy and absence of radiotherapy. In the full text, the minimally invasive group had smaller tumours (mean 4.0 versus 6.0 cm), less advanced pathological Masaoka stage and more favourable WHO histology, and partial thymectomy was more frequent (27% versus 9%); among the minimally invasive operations 315 were thoracoscopic and 146 robotic; survival was not analysed and the authors state that recurrence events were too few to study recurrence.
- Arms
- Open thymectomy (control, n = 2,053): Open thymectomy
- Minimally invasive thymectomy (experimental, n = 461): Minimally invasive thymectomy
- People
- Burt BM, senior author Scott W, International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG)
Δ R0 resection+8 pointsΔ R0 resection0 points
Show the numbers
| Endpoint | Analysis | Minimally invasive thymectomy | Open thymectomy | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0 resectionAll 2,514 patients (unmatched) | finalBurt 2017 | 94% | 86% | P<0.0001Observational, unadjusted comparison. |
| R0 resectionPropensity-matched groups (266 patients in each group) | finalBurt 2017 | 96% | 96% | P=0.7Observational; matched on recorded characteristics only. |
| Endpoint | Analysis | Minimally invasive thymectomy | Open thymectomy | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R0 resectionAll 2,514 patients (unmatched) | finalBurt 2017 | 94% | 86% | P<0.0001Observational, unadjusted comparison. |
| R0 resectionPropensity-matched groups (266 patients in each group) | finalBurt 2017 | 96% | 96% | P=0.7Observational; matched on recorded characteristics only. |